The Predictive Utility of MammaPrint and BluePrint in Identifying Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Who are Most Likely to Have Nodal Downstaging and a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) increases the feasibility of surgical resection by downstaging large primary breast tumors and nodal involvement, which may result in surgical de-escalation and improved outcomes. This subanalysis from the Multi-Institutional Neo-adjuvant Therapy MammaPrint Project I (MINT) trial evaluated the association between MammaPrint and BluePrint with nodal downstaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prospective MINT trial (NCT01501487) enrolled 387 patients between 2011 and 2016 aged ≥ 18 years with invasive breast cancer (T2-T4). This subanalysis includes 146 patients with stage II-III, lymph node positive, who received NCT. MammaPrint stratifies tumors as having a Low Risk or High Risk of distant metastasis. Together with MammaPrint, BluePrint genomically (g) categorizes tumors as gLuminal A, gLuminal B, gHER2, or gBasal. RESULTS: Overall, 45.2% (n = 66/146) of patients had complete nodal downstaging, of whom 60.6% (n = 40/66) achieved a pathologic complete response. MammaPrint and combined MammaPrint and BluePrint were significantly associated with nodal downstaging (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively). A greater proportion of patients with MammaPrint High Risk tumors had nodal downstaging compared with Low Risk (p = 0.007). When classified with MammaPrint and BluePrint, more patients with gLuminal B, gHER2, and gBasal tumors had nodal downstaging compared with HR+HER2-, gLuminal A tumors (p = 0.538, p < 0.001, and p = 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with genomically High Risk tumors, defined by MammaPrint with or without BluePrint, respond better to NCT and have a higher likelihood of nodal downstaging compared with patients with gLuminal A tumors. These genomic signatures can be used to select node-positive patients who are more likely to have nodal downstaging and avoid invasive surgical procedures.

The Clinical Utility of DCISionRT® on Radiation Therapy Decision Making in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. Trials have not identified a low-risk cohort, based on clinicopathologic features, who do not benefit from RT. A biosignature (DCISionRT®) that evaluates recurrence risk has been developed and validated. We evaluated the impact of DCISionRT on clinicians' recommendations for adjuvant RT. METHODS: The PREDICT study is a prospective, multi-institutional, observational registry in which patients underwent DCISionRT testing. The primary endpoint was to identify the percentage of patients where testing led to a change in RT recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, 539 women were included in this study. Pre DCISionRT testing, RT was recommended to 69% of patients; however, post-testing, a change in the RT recommendation was made for 42% of patients compared with the pre-testing recommendation; the percentage of women who were recommended RT decreased by 20%. For women initially recommended not to receive an RT pre-test, 35% had their recommendation changed to add RT following testing, while post-test, 46% of patients had their recommendation changed to omit RT after an initial recommendation for RT. When considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors, the elevated DCISionRT score risk group (DS > 3) had the strongest association with an RT recommendation (odds ratio 43.4) compared with age, grade, size, margin status, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS: DCISionRT provided information that significantly changed the recommendations to add or omit RT. Compared with traditional clinicopathologic features used to determine recommendations for or against RT, the factor most strongly associated with RT recommendations was the DCISionRT result, with other factors of importance being patient preference, tumor size, and grade.

Chemoprevention of Azoxymethane-induced Colon Carcinogenesis by Delta-Tocotrienol.

This study evaluated the preclinical activity of δ-tocotrienol (DT3), a bioactive form of vitamin E, in the inhibition of colorectal cancer growth and development in vitro and in vivo DT3 is the most bioactive isomer of vitamin E in inhibiting growth of colorectal cancer cells. However, it had little effect on the proliferation of normal colon mucosal cells NCM460. In HCT-116 and SW-620 colorectal cancer cells, DT3 (50 µmol/L) significantly inhibited malignant transformation (P < 0.02, P < 0.001), cell migration (P < 0.02, P < 0.05), and invasion (P < 0.05, P < 0.01) compared with vehicle. DT3 inhibited markers for epithelial (E-cadherin) to mesenchymal (vimentin) transition, metastasis (matrix metalloproteinase 9), angiogenesis VEGF, inflammation (NF-κB), and Wnt signaling (ß-catenin) compared with vehicle in colorectal cancer cells. DT3 induced apoptosis selectively in colorectal cancer cells (SW-620 cells, HCT-116 cells, and HT-29) without affecting the normal colon cells. In the azoxymethane-induced colorectal carcinogenesis model in rats, DT3 (200 mg/kg orally twice a day) for 20 weeks significantly inhibited colorectal polyps by 70% and colorectal cancer by almost 99% compared with the vehicle treatment group (P < 0.02, P < 0.001), and the cancer inhibition effect was more potent than sulindac (50%). Taken together, these data demonstrate that DT3 is a potential chemopreventive agent in colorectal cancer, warranting further investigation into its clinical use in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer.

A Large Randomized Trial: Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) for Breast Cancer (BC) Survivors on Salivary Cortisol and IL-6.

Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience psychological and physiological symptoms after cancer treatment. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), a complementary and alternative therapy, has reduced subjective measures of stress, anxiety, and fatigue among BCS. Little is known, however, about how MBSR affects objective markers of stress, specifically the stress hormone cortisol and the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6). In the present study, BCS ( N = 322) were randomly assigned to a 6-week MBSR program for BC or usual-care control. Measurements of cortisol, IL-6, symptoms, and quality of life were obtained at orientation and 6 weeks. Cortisol and IL-6 were also measured prior to and after the MBSR(BC) class Weeks 1 and 6. The mean age of participants was 56.6 years and 69.4% were White non-Hispanic. Most had Stage I (33.8%) or II (35.7%) BC, and 35.7% had received chemotherapy and radiation. Cortisol levels were reduced immediately following MBSR(BC) class compared to before the class Weeks 1 and 6 (Wilcoxon-signed rank test; p < .01, d = .52-.56). IL-6 was significantly reduced from pre- to postclass at Week 6 (Wilcoxon-signed rank test; p < .01, d = .21). No differences were observed between the MBSR(BC) and control groups from baseline to Week 6 using linear mixed models. Significant relationships with small effect sizes were observed between IL-6 and both symptoms and quality of life in both groups. Results support the use of MBSR(BC) to reduce salivary cortisol and IL-6 levels in the short term in BCS.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR[BC]) on Levels of Inflammatory Biomarkers Among Recovering Breast Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this substudy of a large randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (Breast Cancer) (MBSR[BC]) program compared to usual care (UC) in normalizing blood levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines among breast cancer survivors (BCS). METHOD: A total of 322 BCS were randomized to either a 6-week MBSR(BC) program or a UC. At baseline and 6 and 12 weeks, 10 ml of venous blood and demographic and clinical data were collected and/or updated. Plasma cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor [TNF] α, transforming growth factor [TGF] ß1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor [sTNFR] 1) were assayed. Linear mixed models were used to assess cytokine levels across three time points (baseline and 6 and 12 weeks) by group (MBSR[BC] vs. UC). RESULTS: Of the six measured cytokines, three were nondetectable at rates greater than 50% (IL-10, IL-1ß, TGF-ß1) and, because of overall low prevalence, were not analyzed further. For the remaining cytokines (TNFα, IL-6, sTNFR1), results showed that TNFα and IL-6 increased during the follow-up period (between 6 and 12 weeks) rather than during the MBSR(BC) training period (between baseline and 6 weeks), while sTNFR1 levels did not change significantly across the 12-week period. CONCLUSIONS: Study results suggest that MBSR(BC) affects cytokine levels in BCS, mainly with increases in TNFα and IL-6. The data further suggest that B-cell modulation may be a part of immune recovery during breast cancer management and that increases in TNFα and IL-6 may be markers for MBSR(BC)-related recovery.

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Post-treatment Breast Cancer Patients: Immediate and Sustained Effects Across Multiple Symptom Clusters.

CONTEXT: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) face adverse physical and psychological symptoms, often co-occurring. Biologic and psychological factors may link symptoms within clusters, distinguishable by prevalence and/or severity. Few studies have examined the effects of behavioral interventions or treatment of symptom clusters. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify symptom clusters among post-treatment BCS and determine symptom cluster improvement following the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Breast Cancer (MBSR(BC)) program. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-two Stage 0-III post-treatment BCS were randomly assigned to either a six-week MBSR(BC) program or usual care. Psychological (depression, anxiety, stress, and fear of recurrence), physical (fatigue, pain, sleep, and drowsiness), and cognitive symptoms and quality of life were assessed at baseline, six, and 12 weeks, along with demographic and clinical history data at baseline. A three-step analytic process included the error-accounting models of factor analysis and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Four symptom clusters emerged at baseline: pain, psychological, fatigue, and cognitive. From baseline to six weeks, the model demonstrated evidence of MBSR(BC) effectiveness in both the psychological (anxiety, depression, perceived stress and QOL, emotional well-being) (P = 0.007) and fatigue (fatigue, sleep, and drowsiness) (P < 0.001) clusters. Results between six and 12 weeks showed sustained effects, but further improvement was not observed. CONCLUSION: Our results provide clinical effectiveness evidence that MBSR(BC) works to improve symptom clusters, particularly for psychological and fatigue symptom clusters, with the greatest improvement occurring during the six-week program with sustained effects for several weeks after MBSR(BC) training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name and URL of Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT01177124.

Evidence for a better nodal staging system for melanoma: the clinical relevance of metastatic disease confined to the sentinel lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis tested in this study was whether patients with stage III metastatic melanoma confined to their sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) had a more favorable prognosis than patients who had SLN and non-SLN (NSLN) metastases. METHODS: Patients were identified who were clinically negative in their regional basins but with lymphatic mapping were found to have positive SLNs (331 patients). All patients subsequently underwent a complete lymph node dissection of the lymphatic basin involved, and the total number of metastatic SLNs and NSLNs were documented. RESULTS: As the regional metastatic disease involves NSLNs, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) decreases. For patients with a total of 2 nodes positive, those with disease confined to the SLNs had a significant better prognosis (DFS and OS: P < .00001) than those in whom 1 SLN and 1 non-SLN was involved. This difference was apparent for those patients with N2 and N3 disease (2 or more nodes positive in their regional basin). A multivariate regression analysis that included Breslow thickness, ulceration, number of positive nodes, and NSLN positivity showed that NSLN positivity (P = .0019) was the most powerful predictor of DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: When metastatic melanoma overwhelms the SLN and involves NSLNs, the biologic behavior changes to portend a worse survival, regardless of the total node count positive. These data make the argument that the current N staging system should be changed to incorporate SLN vs NSLN involvement.

The number of lymph nodes involved with metastatic disease does not affect outcome in melanoma patients as long as all disease is confined to the sentinel lymph node.

BACKGROUND: In melanoma, a direct relationship exists between the number of nodes involved with metastatic disease and prognosis. This study was undertaken to determine whether an individual with metastatic disease confined to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) would have a better prognosis than individuals with metastatic disease that has spread to the non-SLNs, regardless of the number of nodes involved. METHODS: The study group consists of 229 melanoma patients with a positive SLN who underwent regional nodal dissection. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess association of the number of SLNs and non-SLNs involved with disease with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: DFS and OS were unchanged regardless of how many SLNs were positive, as long as all disease was confined to SLNs. Among 183 patients without involvement of non-SLNs, OS remained the same despite an increasing number of SLNs involved (P = .59). This was true after controlling for ulceration, Breslow depth, age, sex, and adjuvant treatment. Once disease was present beyond the SLN, DFS and OS were negatively affected. Among patients with involvement of non-SLNs, there was no statistically significant association between the number of positive SLNs and survival. The risk of mortality increased with the number of non-SLNs involved with metastatic disease (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of regional nodes involved with metastatic disease does not affect DFS and OS if disease is confined to the SLNs. Consideration should be given to specifying SLN versus non-SLN involvement in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual.

Molecular staging for patients with malignant melanoma.

Molecular staging of cancers hold the promise of being more accurate compared with routine histology, particularly with regard to determining regional-nodal status. With newer reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR)-based assays, sensitivities reported are as high as identifying one cancer cell in a background of a million normal cells. Although this sensitivity is 100-times what the human eye can differentiate under the microscope, the new challenge becomes determining the relevance of this low-volume disease in the regional basin, in particular, the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Patients with melanomas greater than 0.75 mm in tumor thickness participated in a research study that examined their SLNs with routine histology, immunhistochemical staining and a RT-PCR assay based on the tyrosinase probe. A total of 311 patients were involved in the study and patients whose SLN were negative from all three assays for metastatic disease had a good survival, with a 92% disease-free survival (DFS) and a 97% overall survival (OS) regardless of the tumor thickness or the ulceration status of the primary melanoma. Patients upstaged with the RT-PCR assay had a significantly decreased DFS and OS compared with patients who were SLN negative. Patients who had enough tumor burden in the SLN that allowed their metastatic disease to be identified with routine histology had a 48% recurrence rate at 5 years. A recently published meta-analysis confirmed that molecular staging of the SLN in melanoma contains important prognostic information. Micrometastatic disease missed by routine histology in the SLN in melanoma patients is clinically relevant disease. Molecular staging has the potential of providing a more accurate staging in the SLN, for prognostication and directing adjuvant therapies.

National trials involving lymphatic mapping for melanoma: the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial, the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, and the Florida Melanoma Trial.

Radioguided surgery and lymphatic mapping provide more accurate staging and a less morbid operation for the patient with malignant melanoma. It has rapidly become the standard of care for the nodal staging of this disease. Regional and national trials have been designed to address various questions that concern the application of this technique. The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT), being performed by Donald Morton at the John Wayne Cancer Institute, is a national trial that will address whether this surgical strategy provides a survival benefit for patients. The national, industry-sponsored SunBelt Melanoma Trial (SBMT), with Kelly McMasters from the University of Louiville as the principle investigator, will determine the role of molecular staging in patients who undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) harvest. In another arm of the study, the role of adjuvant interferon alfa (IFN) will be examined in patients with minimal disease in the regional basin, those patients with just one microscopically positive SLN. Finally, the Florida Melanoma Trial (FMT), with the central office and laboratory located at the Lakeland Regional Cancer Center, is a regional, industry-sponsored trial that will determine whether all patients with a positive SLN need to undergo a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) of the affected basin. Clinicians await the results of these three trials to help to determine the final role of radioguided surgery in patients with malignant melanoma.

The staging of malignant melanoma and the Florida Melanoma Trial.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have changed the standard of care for patients with malignant melanoma, by providing a less morbid procedure to obtain the nodal staging information that is critical for therapeutic decisions. Detailed examination of the SLN identifies patients who have an increased risk for recurrence and death. Patients whose melanoma is upstaged with very sensitive assays based on reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction technology are better targeted for clinical trials or surgical or adjuvant therapies. In the future, melanoma may be "ultrastaged" by examining the SLNs, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. This may improve identification of patients who are surgically cured of their disease and therefore can be spared the side effects of more radical surgery or the toxicities of adjuvant therapy. The lymphatic mapping procedure is the most accurate way to determine the tumor status of the regional lymph nodes.

Roles of activated Src and Stat3 signaling in melanoma tumor cell growth.

Activation of protein tyrosine kinases is prevalent in human cancers and previous studies have demonstrated that Stat3 signaling is a point of convergence for many of these tyrosine kinases. Moreover, a critical role for constitutive activation of Stat3 in tumor cell proliferation and survival has been established in diverse cancers. However, the oncogenic signaling pathways in melanoma cells remain to be fully defined. In this study, we demonstrate that Stat3 is constitutively activated in a majority of human melanoma cell lines and tumor specimens examined. Blocking Src tyrosine kinase activity, but not EGF receptor or JAK family kinases, leads to inhibition of Stat3 signaling in melanoma cell lines. Consistent with a role of Src in the pathogenesis of melanoma, we show that c-Src tyrosine kinase is activated in melanoma cell lines. Significantly, melanoma cells undergo apoptosis when either Src kinase activity or Stat3 signaling is inhibited. Blockade of Src or Stat3 is also accompanied by down-regulation of expression of the anti-apoptotic genes, Bcl-x(L) and Mcl-1. These findings demonstrate that Src-activated Stat3 signaling is important for the growth and survival of melanoma tumor cells.

Final results of the Department of Defense multicenter breast lymphatic mapping trial.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have the potential to become the standard of care for nodal staging in breast cancer patients, but their widespread utility outside of university-based centers has not been determined. This study describes the final results from a national multi-institutional trial designed to determine the role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in breast lymphatic mapping, the rate of success for finding an SLN, and the rate of skip metastasis for patients with invasive breast cancer across all practice scenarios. METHODS: Lymphatic mapping techniques involving the combined use of blue dye and radiocolloid were taught to participating surgeons through a formal 2-day training course at the Moffitt Cancer Center. In protocol 1, surgeons performed their first 20 to 25 cases of breast mapping with SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection. In protocol 2, after the learning phase, surgeons did not perform axillary lymph node dissection unless a SLN was positive for metastatic disease. RESULTS: Forty-two institutions, including 12 university-based research centers, participated in the trial. From July 1, 1997, through January 31, 1999, a total of 965 patients were accrued. Lymphoscintigraphy identified drainage to an axillary SLN 64% of the time, but by using sensitive handheld gamma probes at the time of the operation, an axillary SLN could be identified 86% of the time. The rate of success for finding an axillary SLN was 92.8% for cases performed at the Moffitt Cancer Center. For other university centers, the rate of success of identifying an axillary SLN was 91.4%, and for other community/regional hospitals in the study, it was 85.2%. For cases in which protocol 1 was followed, the rate of false-negative SLN biopsy was 4%. There was no axillary nodal recurrence after a negative SLN in protocol 2 when a negative SLN biopsy was followed by observation. The median follow-up for the patients on protocol 2 was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data show a high rate of success for finding an axillary SLN and a low rate of skip metastasis in a national multicenter study of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. This study suggests that SLN biopsy for breast cancer can be performed successfully in community/regional hospitals, as well as in major university-based centers.