Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy are utilized for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF), but their comparative effectiveness, especially with contemporary treatment modalities, remains undefined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis contrasting current ablation techniques against antiarrhythmic medications for AF. METHODS: We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science until November 2023 for randomized trials comparing AF catheter ablation with antiarrhythmics, against antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone, reporting outcomes for > 6 months. Four investigators extracted data and appraised risk of bias (ROB) with ROB 2 tool. Meta-analyses estimated pooled efficacy and safety outcomes using R software. RESULTS: Twelve trials (n = 3977) met the inclusion criteria. Catheter ablation was associated with lower AF recurrence (relative risk (RR) = 0.44, 95%CI (0.33, 0.59), P ˂ 0.0001) and hospitalizations (RR = 0.44, 95%CI (0.23, 0.82), P = 0.009) than antiarrhythmic medications. Catheter ablation also improved the physical quality of life component score (assessed by a 36-item Short Form survey) by 7.61 points (95%CI -0.70-15.92, P = 0.07); but, due to high heterogeneity, it was not statistically significant. Ablation was significantly associated with higher procedural-related complications [RR = 15.70, 95%CI (4.53, 54.38), P < 0.0001] and cardiac tamponade [RR = 9.22, 95%CI (2.16, 39.40), P = 0.0027]. All-cause mortality was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For symptomatic AF, upfront catheter ablation reduces arrhythmia and hospitalizations better than continued medical therapy alone, albeit with moderately more adverse events. Careful patient selection and risk-benefit assessment are warranted regarding the timing of ablation.

Gender Disparity in Leading Authorship of Critical Care Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In critical care medicine, research trials serve as crucial avenues for disseminating knowledge, influencing clinical practices, and fostering innovation. Notably, a significant gender imbalance exists within this field, potentially mirrored in the authorship of critical care research. This study aimed to investigate an exploration to ascertain the presence and extent of female representation in first and senior authorship roles within critical care literature. To this end, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for original articles published up to February 2024, coupled with a methodological quality assessment via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and statistical analyses through Review Manager software (RevMan, version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). The study's findings, distilled from seven studies included in the final analysis, reveal a pronounced gender disparity. Specifically, in critical care literature examining mixed populations, female first authors were significantly less common than their male counterparts, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.18-5.68; p < 0.00001). Conversely, pediatric critical care studies did not show a significant difference in gender distribution among first authors (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.31-6.10; p = 0.68). The investigation also highlighted a stark underrepresentation of female senior authors in critical care research across both mixed (OR: 11.67; 95% CI: 7.76-17.56; p < 0.00001) and pediatric populations (OR: 5.41; 95% CI: 1.88-15.56; p = 0.002). These findings underscore the persistent underrepresentation of women in critical care literature authorship and their slow progression into leadership roles, as evidenced by the disproportionately low number of female senior authors.

Empowering Patients Through Digital Health Literacy and Access to Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in the Developing World.

This editorial discusses the transformative potential of digital health literacy and the critical role of electronic medical records (EMRs) in promoting patient empowerment in the healthcare landscape of developing countries. It examines the impact of digital media in healthcare, noting its ability to both democratize access to information and services and pose risks of misinformation among populations with limited health literacy. The discussion includes an overview of key literacy components critical for effectively navigating the digital healthcare ecosystem. Our article highlights the critical role of EMR in facilitating a patient-centered care (PCC) model, with a special emphasis on making EMR systems accessible and user-friendly for vulnerable groups in developing countries. The core aim of our study is twofold: First, it sheds light on the significant challenges - be they technical, financial, or infrastructural - that obstruct the adoption of sophisticated EMR systems in these areas. Second, it explores the essential aspect of digital health literacy, advocating for its improvement as a vital step toward enabling patients to effectively engage with their medical records. By addressing these key issues, our study seeks to illustrate how enhancing digital health literacy, alongside increasing the accessibility of EMR systems, can empower patients in the developing world to actively participate in their healthcare processes. This dual focus aims to contribute to the broader discourse on improving healthcare outcomes through more inclusive and patient-centered approaches, particularly in settings that are currently underserved by modern healthcare technologies. In conclusion, the editorial advocates for a concerted effort toward creating a more inclusive and empowered healthcare paradigm. It suggests integrating PCC principles, tailoring EMR systems to diverse needs, and enhancing digital health literacy as strategies to harness digital health innovations for better healthcare outcomes and equity. It emphasizes the importance of ongoing investment in education, technology, and policy to fully leverage digital health solutions in the developing world.

Mortality, morbidity & clinical outcome with different types of vasopressors in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Despite their continued use, the effectiveness and safety of vasopressors in post-cardiac arrest patients remain controversial. This study examined the efficacy of various vasopressors in cardiac arrest patients in terms of clinical, morbidity, and mortality outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using online databases (MeSH terms: MEDLINE (Ovid), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar) from 1997 to 2023 for relevant English language studies. The primary outcomes of interest for this study included short-term survival leading to death, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, neurological outcomes, survival to hospital admission, myocardial infarction, and incidence of arrhythmias. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, 26 studies, including 16 RCTs and ten non-RCTs, were evaluated. The focus was on the efficacy of epinephrine, vasopressin, methylprednisolone, dopamine, and their combinations in medical emergencies. Epinephrine treatment was associated with better odds of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 1.52, 95%CI [1.20, 1.94]; p < 0.001) and achieving ROSC (OR = 3.60, 95% CI [3.45, 3.76], P < 0.00001)) over placebo but not in other outcomes of interest such as short-term survival/ death at 28-30 days, survival to hospital admission, or neurological function. In addition, our analysis indicates non-superiority of vasopressin or epinephrine vasopressin-plus-epinephrine therapy over epinephrine monotherapy except for survival to hospital admission where the combinatorial therapy was associated with better outcome (0.76, 95%CI [0.64, 0.92]; p = 0.004). Similarly, we noted the non-superiority of vasopressin-plus-methylprednisolone versus placebo. Finally, while higher odds of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 3.35, 95%CI [1.81, 6.2]; p < 0.001) and ROSC (OR = 2.87, 95%CI [1.97, 4.19]; p < 0.001) favoring placebo over VSE therapy were observed, the risk of lethal arrhythmia was not statistically significant. There was insufficient literature to assess the effects of dopamine versus other treatment modalities meta-analytically. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicated that only epinephrine yielded superior outcomes among vasopressors than placebo, albeit limited to survival to hospital discharge and ROSC. Additionally, we demonstrate the non-superiority of vasopressin over epinephrine, although vasopressin could not be compared to placebo due to the paucity of data. The addition of vasopressin to epinephrine treatment only improved survival to hospital admission.

Neurosarcoidosis and Transverse Myelitis: Life-Threatening Manifestations of Sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disorder, typically involves the lungs, skin, and lymph nodes. Neurological manifestations are diverse and may include longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), an uncommon inflammatory disorder of the spinal cord. We present a case of a 62-year-old female with LETM as the initial manifestation of sarcoidosis. The patient exhibited progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness, urinary retention, and sensory disturbances. Diagnostic workup revealed characteristic findings on spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and thoracic biopsy. Treatment with high-dose corticosteroids and subsequent immunomodulatory therapy resulted in significant improvement. Our case highlights the importance of including sarcoidosis in the differentials of LETM, particularly in patients with no respiratory manifestations.

Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis Masquerading as Pancreatic Head Carcinoma.

Obstructive jaundice is a joint clinical presentation with many etiologies, including pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Differentiating between these two conditions is pivotal due to the divergent management approaches and prognoses. In this case report, we present a case of a 49-year-old female patient who presented with weight loss, intermittent chronic abdominal pain, and jaundice. She was initially suspected of having pancreatic cancer because of clinical presentation and imaging findings. However, she was ultimately diagnosed with Type 1 AIP due to histopathology findings and elevated immunoglobulin G4. This case highlights the complexities in diagnosis, the role of advanced imaging techniques and tissue sampling, and the lessons learned regarding managing this challenging clinical scenario.

Digital Pathology: Transforming Diagnosis in the Digital Age.

In the context of rapid technological advancements, the narrative review titled "Digital Pathology: Transforming Diagnosis in the Digital Age" explores the significant impact of digital pathology in reshaping diagnostic approaches. This review delves into the various effects of the field, including remote consultations and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis, revealing the ongoing transformation taking place. The investigation explores the process of digitizing traditional glass slides, which aims to improve accessibility and facilitate sharing. Additionally, it addresses the complexities associated with data security and standardization challenges. Incorporating AI enhances pathologists' diagnostic capabilities and accelerates analytical procedures. Furthermore, the review highlights the growing importance of collaborative networks facilitating global knowledge sharing. It also emphasizes the significant impact of this technology on medical education and patient care. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of digital pathology's transformative and innovative potential, highlighting its disruptive nature in reshaping diagnostic practices.

An Assessment and Management of Plexiform Schwannoma of the Third Webspace in a Female: A Case Report.

Schwannoma is a rare benign soft tissue tumor that appears like a neuroma based on its specific location and clinical features. We report a case of a plexiform schwannoma in a middle-aged woman who had a painful bump located in the third webspace on the dorsum of her right foot for the last four years. Initially, the swelling was thought to be Morton's neuroma based on location and clinical feature findings. The mass was resected and was sent for histopathological examination, revealing a plexiform schwannoma, most likely developing from the cutaneous nerves on the dorsum of the foot. She reported improvement in her symptoms after complete and careful excision without any neurological deficit. Investigation of any subcutaneous foot swelling should be coupled with a histopathological examination for comprehensive management.

Risk Factors Associated With Non-Respondence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Oral methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, not all RA patients respond to MTX. In this study, we will determine the risk factors associated with MTX failure. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Data of 612 patients who were diagnosed with RA from June 2019 to January 2021 were retrieved from the medical record room. After inclusion, patients were divided into two groups; respondent and non-respondent. Their characteristics and demographics were compared. RESULTS: Out of the total 612 patients, 112 (18.3%) were labelled as non-respondent to MTX. Non-respondents had a higher predominance of females (86.6% vs. 60.2%; p-value: 0.001), participants with body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 (54.4% vs. 22.4%; p-value: <0.00001), smokers (34.8% vs. 18.2%; p-value: 0.0001), participants with diabetes (47.3% vs. 23.4%; p-value: <0.0001) and rheumatoid factor positivity (91.0% vs. 64.8%; p-value: <0.0001). CONCLUSION: Female gender, higher BMI, smoking, higher disease activity, and diabetes were associated with MTX failure. These easily available parameters can help predict the disease process and outcome of treatment. It is important to screen patients who are at risk of MTX failure, so a contingent treatment plan can be devised, in case patients do not respond to MTX.