RESUMO
ABSTTACT: -The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and genetically engineered biological drugs (biological DMARDs, or biologics) on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biologics and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcutaneous injection, 160 mg/ml-0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000-500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. On weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of tender and swollen joints (TJC28 and SJC28), the level of acute-phase inflammation markers, the DAS28 (disease activity score), ESR, CRP, CDAI (clinical activity index), and the functional state index HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) were determined, as well as the safety profile of therapy was assessed. RESULTS: Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease in TJC28 was detected after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment with olokizumab (Artlegia®) (Me baseline = 10, Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 4, p < 0.05) and a decrease in TSC28 was detected after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (Me baseline = 9, Me 4 weeks = 3.5, Me 8 weeks = 2.5, Me 12 weeks = 2.0, p < 0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me4 weeks = 21, Me4 weeks = 1, p < 0.05, ESR: Mesno = 31, Me4 weeks = 7, p < 0.05). Positive dynamics persisted on 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from week 4 in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22, p < 0.05; DAS28CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45, p < 0.05; CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0, p < 0.05. All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by week 12 of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential contribution made by autoantibodies against tumour necrosis factor (TNF) to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: We used affinity chromatography methods and a magnetic separation procedure to purify human autoantibodies specific to TNF. The autoantibodies were used as calibration material to determine the absolute content of autoantibodies to TNF using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). TNF content and the levels of soluble TNF receptors types I and II (sTNF-RI and sTNF-RII) were determined using commercial ELISA test kits. RESULTS: We demonstrated significant increases in the levels of TNF, sTNF-RI, and sTNF-RII in the sera of patients with acute RA and in patients with RA who had responded positively to therapy compared with healthy controls. Levels of autoantibodies of the immunoglobulin (Ig)G2, IgG3, and IgG4 subclasses were significantly higher in sera from patients with acute RA than in sera from healthy controls. Level of autoantibodies of the IgG2 subclass were significantly higher in sera from patients with acute RA than in RA patients who had responded positively to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Acute RA is associated with changes in levels of TNF and soluble receptors for TNF and also in levels of autoantibodies to TNF. Given the magnitude of the changes in levels of different subclasses of autoantibodies to TNF, we propose that these autoantibodies might contribute to the pathogenesis of RA.
