Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Psychol ; 20(2): 141-5, 2001 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11315732

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine whether learned helplessness, cognitive distortions, self-efficacy, and dispositional optimism assessed at Time 1 (T1; questionnaires mailed at 1 month postdischarge) would predict depressive symptoms at Time 2 (T2; questionnaires mailed at 1-year follow-up) in a sample of 86 patients hospitalized with ischemic heart disease. Multiple regression results indicated that optimism and cognitive distortions at T1 were significantly associated with T1 depressive symptoms after controlling for confounding variables. When the T1 psychological factors were analyzed with T2 depressive symptoms, only optimism continued to predict depressive symptoms after controlling for confounds and T1 depressive symptoms. The global expectancies that optimism assessed appeared to be more stable over time than the statelike beliefs of cognitive distortions and may have accounted for why optimism predicted T2 depressive symptoms.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo/etiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/psicologia , Autoeficácia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Afeto , Idoso , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicações , Prognóstico , Psicometria , Fatores de Risco
2.
Ann Behav Med ; 19(3): 287-94, 1997.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9603703

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine if learned helplessness, self-efficacy, and cognitive distortions would predict depression in a sample of 80 individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 80 individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI). As MS and SCI usually present with disparate disease courses and etiologies, a secondary objective was to determine if individuals with MS would exhibit greater levels of helplessness, cognitive distortions, and depression and lower levels of self-efficacy than those with SCI. Results indicated that helplessness and self-efficacy significantly predicted depression for both the MS and SCI groups after controlling for confounding variables. Cognitive distortions had no independent effect, indicating that cognitive distortions may have caused feelings of helplessness and low self-efficacy and, in this way, had indirect effects on depression. The MS group exhibited significantly greater levels of depression and helplessness and significantly lower levels of self-efficacy than the SCI group. It was hypothesized that it may have been the combination of an unpredictable course of disease activity and the possibility of being affected by MS in many different ways that produced greater feelings of depression, helplessness, and low self-efficacy in the MS group.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Desamparo Aprendido , Esclerose Múltipla/psicologia , Autoimagem , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Mecanismos de Defesa , Feminino , Humanos , Controle Interno-Externo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inventário de Personalidade , Papel do Doente
3.
Cancer Prev Control ; 1(4): 289-303, 1997 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9765753

RESUMO

A review of family physician-assisted smoking cessation research indicates that the family practice setting affords an excellent opportunity to intervene with a large proportion of smokers, at a time when they are receptive to health promotion messages. Outcome data at 6- and 12-month follow-up intervals indicate the value of combining 3 key strategies in achieving optimal results: physician advice and support, nicotine replacement therapy, and cognitive-behavioural counselling. The authors' review identifies questions that need to be addressed in future research: How can barriers to program delivery be overcome in the family practice setting? What is the best way to ensure optimal integration of the 3 key strategies? Which follow-up intervals are appropriate (e.g., 6 months, 12 months, 18 months) given the finding that relapse is common and that most smokers make several quit attempts before stopping for good?


Assuntos
Médicos de Família , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pesquisa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...