Thumb-Basal Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Metacarpal Subsidence: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition.

BACKGROUND: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). METHODS: Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Volar Cortical Integrity in Non-Operatively Treated Adult Distal Radius Fractures.

Background: We sought to independently validate published data that volar cortical integrity (VCI) is an independent predictor of maintenance of closed reduction in a series of non-surgically treated distal radius fractures, while simultaneously investigating previously reported predictors of instability. Our null hypothesis was that volar cortical integrity would not affect maintenance of reduction. Methods: Four hundred thirty-three adult distal radius fractures were screened from our Orthopedic database with 112 meeting inclusion criteria. Two groups were determined on the basis of maintenance of reduction (MOR) or loss of reduction (LOR) at 5-6 weeks post-reduction. Bivariate analysis was applied to previously published instability factors along with VCI. A forward stepwise logistic regression was then used to identify instability factors that, as a group, are most predictive of outcome. Results: Results of 112 patients were collected. Reduction was maintained in 62 patients (55.35%) at 5-6 weeks Biivariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in volar cortical integrity between the 2 groups (80.6% MOR vs 59.2% LOR). Forward stepwise logistic regression analysis of subgroups revealed that post-reduction radial height and VCI were together statistically significant in the model. The presence of VCI, post-reduction radial height greater than or equal to ulnar neutral at the time of initial reduction resulted in a 67.8% successful MOR. Conclusions: We were able to confirm the importance of volar cortical integrity as a predictor of successful maintenance of reduction in non-surgically managed distal radius fractures. When combined with post-reduction radial height greater than or equal to ulnar neutral at the time of initial reduction, it showed a 67.8% MOR with non-operative management in our data-set.

A prospective comparison of 3 approved systems for autologous bone marrow concentration demonstrated nonequivalency in progenitor cell number and concentration.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of 3 commercially available systems: the Harvest SmartPReP 2 BMAC, Biomet BioCUE, and Arteriocyte Magellan systems. We compared the number and concentration of progenitor cells achieved both before and after centrifugation and the percentage of progenitor cells salvaged after centrifugation. METHODS: Forty patients, mean age 47 ± 18 years (range: 18-92 years, 19 male/21 female) were prospectively consented for bilateral iliac crest aspiration. The first 20 aspirations compared the Harvest and Biomet systems, and based on those results, the second 20 compared the Harvest and Arteriocyte systems. One system was randomly assigned to each iliac crest. Each system's unique marrow acquisition process and centrifugation mechanism was followed. Samples for analysis were taken both immediately before the marrow was put into the centrifugation system (after acquisition), and after centrifugation. The number of progenitor cells in each sample was estimated by counting the connective tissue progenitors (CTPs). RESULTS: The Harvest system achieved a significantly greater number and concentration of CTPs both before and after centrifugation when compared to the Biomet system. There was no difference in the percent yield of CTPs after centrifugation. There was no significant difference in the number and concentration of CTPs between the Harvest and Arteriocyte systems before centrifugation, but the Harvest system had a significantly greater number and concentration of CTPs after centrifugation. The Harvest system also had a significantly higher percent yield of CTPs after centrifugation compared with the Arteriocyte system. CONCLUSIONS: The Harvest system resulted in a greater CTP number and concentration after centrifugation when compared with the Biomet and Arteriocyte systems and may thus provide increased osteogenic and chondrogenic capacity.