Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acad Pediatr ; 24(2): 330-337, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37690515

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe pediatric program directors' perceptions of existing mentorship programs in pediatric residencies, to assess whether characteristics used for mentor-mentee assignments impact mentoring outcomes, and to identify barriers to success in mentorship programs. METHODS: With the support of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD) Research Task Force, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study of all associate pediatric program directors in the United States in March 2022. RESULTS: Nearly half (82 of 197, 41.6%) of programs responded. Most (87.8%) report having a formal mentoring program. Half of programs (51.4%) do not provide training to residents on how to be a mentee, and only slightly more than half (62.5%) provide training to faculty mentors. Most programs (80.6%) do not provide protected time for faculty mentors. There were no meaningful associations with characteristics used for mentorship matches and perceived successful mentorship. Top barriers from the program leadership perspective included faculty and residents lacking time, residents lacking skills to be proactive mentees, and inadequate funding. CONCLUSIONS: While a majority of programs have formal mentorship programs, many do not provide training to mentors or mentees. Barriers to mentorship include a lack of funding and time. National organizations, such as APPD and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, have an opportunity to provide guidance and support for protected time, funding, and training for mentors and mentees.


Assuntos
Tutoria , Mentores , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos , Mentores/educação , Estudos Transversais , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Docentes , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Pediatrics ; 144(5)2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31578222

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A recent study in young infants found that different cutoffs maximized the accuracy of the urine white blood cell count in dilute versus concentrated urine samples. We aimed to confirm this finding and to determine its impact on clinical care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data gathered on consecutive children <24 months of age with visits to the emergency department during a 5-year period. We evaluated the accuracy of screening tests for urinary tract infection (UTI) in dilute and concentrated urine samples. We also calculated the number of children who would have been treated differently in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 children presenting with fever had urine specific gravity (SG) been taken into consideration. RESULTS: We included 10 078 children. The ability to rule in UTI (as measured by the positive likelihood ratio [LR]) was similar in dilute and concentrated urine for the leukocyte esterase test (11.76 vs 10.71, respectively). The positive LR for urine white blood cell count per high-powered field was higher in dilute urine (9.83 vs 6.12). In contrast, the positive LR for the nitrite test was lower in dilute urine (20.54 vs 47.44). Despite these differences, we found little change in the number of children treated with antibiotics in predictive models that took urine SG into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found that urine SG influences the accuracy of some components of the urinalysis, its inclusion in the decision-making process had negligible effect on the clinical care of children with UTI.


Assuntos
Gravidade Específica , Urinálise , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Urina/química , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Contagem de Leucócitos , Funções Verossimilhança , Masculino , Piúria/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Urinálise/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...