Impact of electronic medical record utilization on obesity screening and intervention for obese patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of obesity documented within the electronic medical record problem list. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with obesity and endometrial cancer receiving care from January 2018 to March 2021 at a single institution. Obesity intervention was defined as receipt of at least one of the following: referral to weight loss clinic, referral to a nutritionist, completion of obesity intervention tab, or documentation of weight loss counseling. Our secondary objectives were to (1) identify the prevalence of completed obesity interventions, (2) identify the number of patients who have achieved weight loss since their initial visit, and (3) identify covariates associated with presence of obesity on problem list, completion of obesity interventions, and weight loss. RESULTS: We identified 372 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of eligible patients, 202 (54%) had obesity documented on their problem list and 171 (46%) completed at least one obesity intervention. Within our cohort, 195 (52%) patients achieved weight loss from diagnosis or initial clinical encounter at our institution to most recent clinical encounter with median weight loss of 3.9 kg (IQR 1.5-8.0). In the multivariable logistic regressions, patients with obesity on the problem list were approximately twice as likely to have completion of obesity intervention (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.09, 3.35, p=0.024). Although presence of obesity on the problem list was not associated with weight loss, completion of health maintenance obesity intervention tab in the electronic medical record (Epic) was associated with weight loss (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.11, 6.89, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Only half of obese endometrial cancer patients had documentation of obesity within the electronic medical record problem list. The electronic medical record could be leveraged to achieve compliance with weight loss interventions. Further investigation on how the electronic medical record can be optimized to help patients achieve weight loss is needed.

Rise in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Rate Is Associated with Increase in Buprenorphine Prescription Numbers.

OBJECTIVES: Southern Appalachia is a region of the United States that is disproportionately affected by the opioid epidemic and by increasing rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). NAS rates increased approximately 400% between 1999 and 2012. Buprenorphine prescriptions written to treat opioid use disorder also increased dramatically. The present study was undertaken to ascertain any relationship between the number of buprenorphine prescriptions compared with NAS rates in southern Appalachia. METHODS: A total of 250 southern Appalachian counties across seven states, including all of West Virginia and portions of Virginia, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, and Tennessee were identified. A retrospective cohort analysis of these counties was conducted for the years 2005-2018. All of the data were obtained from publicly accessible sources or direct communication with government offices. Measures from each county in southern Appalachia included annual NAS rates, buprenorphine prescription rates, drug-induced death rates, and opioid prescribing rates. Associations among these variables were examined using a generalized linear regression. RESULTS: Significant linear associations exist between the rising rate of NAS diagnoses and the rising rate of buprenorphine prescriptions (r = 0.977, R2 = 95.53%, P < 0.001) and between the rising rate of buprenorphine prescriptions and the increase in drug-induced deaths (r = 0.712, R2 = 50.82%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that documents an association between rising NAS rates and increasing buprenorphine prescribing. Between the years 2010 and 2018, the NAS rate in southern Appalachia rose by 335%, and the number of buprenorphine prescriptions rose by 413%. Discussions regarding the current policies for buprenorphine management during pregnancy are warranted. We suggest a reevaluation of buprenorphine prescribing recommendations during pregnancy and further research on establishing the lowest effective buprenorphine dose for each pregnant patient.