Dysplastic naevi with moderate to severe histological dysplasia: a risk factor for melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The risk of malignant melanoma associated with histologically dysplastic naevi (HDN) has not been defined. While clinically atypical naevi appear to confer an independent risk of melanoma, no study has evaluated the extent to which HDN are predictive of melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of melanoma associated with HDN. Secondarily, the risk associated with number of naevi and large naevi is estimated. METHODS: We enrolled 80 patients with newly diagnosed melanoma along with 80 spousal controls. After obtaining information on melanoma risk factors and performing a complete cutaneous examination, the most clinically atypical naevus was biopsied in both cases and controls. Histological dysplasia was then assessed independently by 13 dermatopathologists (0, no dysplasia; 1, mild dysplasia; 2, moderate dysplasia; 3, severe dysplasia). The dermatopathologists were blinded as to whether the naevi were from melanoma subjects or controls. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine if there was an independent association between the degree of histological dysplasia in naevi and a personal history of melanoma. RESULTS: In persons with naevi receiving an average score of > 1 (i.e. naevi considered to have greater than mild histological dysplasia), there was an increased risk of melanoma [odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-6.86] which persisted after adjustment for confounders (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.02-15.71). Very few dermatopathologists reliably graded naevi of subjects with melanoma as being more dysplastic than naevi of control subjects. Among the entire group, the interobserver reliability associated with grading histological dysplasia in naevi was poor (weighted kappa 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: HDN do appear to confer an independent risk of melanoma. However, this result may add more to our biological understanding of melanoma risk than to clinical assessment of risk, because HDN assessed by a single pathologist generally cannot be used to assess risk of melanoma. Future studies should be directed at establishing reproducible, predictive criteria for grading naevi.

Melanoma risk in relation to height, weight, and exercise (United States).

Height and weight and derivations thereof are positively associated with a number of cancers. While several authors have reported an increased risk of melanoma among people at the higher extremes of these measures, the association has not been fully explored. New cases of primary cutaneous melanoma in 1997 in western Washington State (n = 386) were compared to controls selected by random-digit dialing (n = 727). Each study participant completed a telephone survey, and data were collected on height, weight, sun-related melanoma risk factors, demographic characteristics, as well as habits such as diet and exercise. Risk of melanoma was analyzed by logistic regression with adjustment for age, hair color, lifetime sun exposure, and fruit and vegetable intake. An excess risk of melanoma was identified in men in the upper quartiles of height (OR = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3-4.5), weight (OR = 2.8, CI = 1.5-5.2), and body surface area (OR = 2.8, CI = 1.5-5.1) vs. the lowest quartiles. In women, no association was present for any anthropometric measure. In addition, we found that men and women exercising five to seven days per week were at a decreased risk of melanoma (OR = 0.7, CI = 0.5-1.0). The anthropometric findings are largely consistent with previous studies, while this is the first report of an association of exercise with melanoma risk. The mechanisms for the effect of exercise and for the difference between men and women in the effect of anthropometric factors are unknown. Future research in basic and epidemiologic science should focus on biochemical or behavioral explanations for these observations.