Bone densitometry worldwide: a global survey by the ISCD and IOF.

In a global survey of fracture liaison services, most reported that DXA access met needs. However, adherence to basic DXA quality and reporting procedures was confirmed by only around 50% of institutions and many required education for operators/interpreters. Overall, there is significant variability in the access to, and quality of, DXA services worldwide. INTRODUCTION: While the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been widely adopted worldwide for the assessment of bone mineral density, the quality of DXA facilities is unknown. To address this, a global survey of fracture liaison services (FLS) was conducted by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) to assess the quality of their DXA facilities. METHODS: A questionnaire for the accessibility and quality of DXA services was co-created by representatives of the ISCD and the IOF and made available to institutions who participated in the Capture the Fracture Best Practice Framework. From a list of 331 contacted invitees, 124 FLS centres responded; analyses were based on 121 centres with suitable data. RESULTS: Over 70% of institutions reported that, for over 90% of the time, DXA access met service needs, and the scanning/reporting quality was perceived as excellent. However, 25% of DXA facilities reported not being accredited by a professional/governmental organization, and adherence to some basic DXA quality assurance and reporting procedures was confirmed by < 50% of services. Importantly, in excess of 50% of institutions stated that they desired ongoing education in osteoporosis and DXA for operators and interpreters. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the access to and quality of DXA services for established FLS worldwide. Despite two decades of training initiatives in osteoporosis densitometry, many centres are falling short of the standards of the IOF-ISCD Osteoporosis Essentials criteria.

Ventilatory responses and entrainment of breathing during rowing.

The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the hypothesis that respiration was coupled with the mechanics of the rowing stroke. In the first part of the study, physiologic responses during incremental exercise on the variable-resistance rowing ergometer were compared in 16 untrained female subjects (U), 17 collegiate female rowers (C), and 21 elite oarswomen (E). Minute ventilation (VE) and frequency of respiration (fR) were examined on a log scale as their relationship with oxygen consumption (VO2) was exponential. The slopes for log VE/VO2 were similar for collegiate (0.65 +/- 0.02) and elite (0.59 +/- 0.01) rowers, but the slope was significantly higher for the untrained (0.87 +/- 0.01) subjects (P less than 0.001). Elite rowers utilized a higher tidal volume (VT) response per VO2 (0.68 +/- 0.04 vs 0.30 +/- 0.05; P = 0.01) and lower log fR response per VO2 (0.27 +/- 0.02 vs 0.50 +/- 0.03; P = 0.01) compared with collegiate rowers. The ratio of fR/strokes per minute (SPM) averaged 1.5 in E athletes but varied in the U and C groups. In the second part of the study, pattern and timing of respiration were recording using an inspiratory pneumotachygraph, analyzed, and compared with specific phases of the rowing stroke in ten untrained subjects and nine elite rowers. The ratio of inspiratory time (T1)/total respiratory time (TTOT) decreased during the drive phase and increased during the recovery phase in both untrained subjects and elite rowers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)