Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antivir Ther ; 9(6): 829-48, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15651743

RESUMO

In most European countries, HIV drug resistance testing has become a routine clinical tool. However, its practical implementation in a clinical context is demanding. The European HIV Drug Resistance Panel was established to make recommendations to clinicians and virologists on this topic and to propose quality control measures. The panel recommends resistance testing for the following indications: i) drug-naive patients with acute or recent infection; ii) therapy failure, including suboptimal treatment response, when treatment change is considered; iii) pregnant HIV-1-infected women and paediatric patients with detectable viral load when treatment initiation or change is considered; and iv) genotype source patient when post-exposure prophylaxis is considered. In addition, for drug-naive patients with chronic infection in whom treatment is to be started, the panel suggests that resistance testing should be strongly considered and recommends testing the earliest sample for drug resistance if suspicion of resistance is high or prevalence of resistance in this population exceeds 10%. The panel does not favour genotyping over phenotype, however it is anticipated that genotyping will be used more often because of its greater accessibility, lower cost and faster turnaround time. For the interpretation of resistance data, clinically validated systems should be used to the greatest extent possible. It is mandatory that laboratories performing HIV resistance tests take regular part in quality assurance programs. Similarly, it is necessary that HIV clinicians and virologists take part in continuous education and meet regularly to discuss problematic clinical cases. Indeed, resistance test results should be used in the context of all other clinically relevant information for predicting therapy response. The panel also encourages the timely collection of epidemiological information to estimate the impact of transmission of resistant HIV and the prevalence of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in the different European countries.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Viral , HIV-1/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/farmacologia , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Viral/genética , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Gravidez , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/uso terapêutico
2.
J Med Screen ; 6(2): 67-9, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10444722

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Molecular biological testing for genetic diseases has grown rapidly, but speed, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, throughput, and cost become more important as large scale screening is considered. This is a pilot study of an assay for the simultaneous detection of up to 31 cystic fibrosis mutations in a multicentre population based screening of 4476 Italian newborns. METHODS: The assay is a polymerase chain reaction, followed by an oligonucleotide ligation assay (PCR/OLA) and finally a sequence coded separation. It allows the detection of up to 31 mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Guthrie spots were used as a source of template DNA. RESULTS: 144 carriers were detected during the analysis of 4476 samples, which translates into a carrier frequency of 1/31.1. Forty two carriers were detected from 1341 samples in Pavia (1/31.9), 53 from 1574 in Turin (1/29.7), and 49 from 1561 in San Giovanni Rotondo (1/31.8). Fifteen different mutations were detected, the most common being delta F508 (0.625). Other common mutations included G542X (16 of 144), which was particularly common in southern Italy (14 of 49), N1303K (8 of 144), and R117H (8 of 144), detected only in the northern centres. CONCLUSIONS: PCR/OLA is a robust, accurate, user friendly method for cystic fibrosis screening of newborns using blood spots in a semiautomated way at a low cost per mutation (0.8 Euro).


Assuntos
Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/genética , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Fibrose Cística/genética , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Sondas de Oligonucleotídeos , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas , Fibrose Cística/prevenção & controle , Análise Mutacional de DNA/métodos , Eletroforese/instrumentação , Eletroforese/métodos , Fluorescência , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Itália , Projetos Piloto , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...