Perioperative population management for primary hip arthroplasty reduces hospital and postacute care utilization while maintaining or improving care quality.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Physician-led multidisciplinary care coordination decreases hospital-associated care needs. We aimed to determine whether such care coordination can show benefits through the posthospital discharge period for elective hip surgery. DESIGN: Time Series of prospectively recorded and historical data. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center and health system. PATIENTS: 449 patients undergoing elective primary hip surgery. INTERVENTIONS: For the intervention group we redesigned care with a comprehensive 14-16 week multidisciplinary standardized clinical pathway, the Ochsner hip arthroplasty perioperative surgical home (PSH). Essential pathway components were preoperative medical risk assessment, frailty scoring, home assessment, education and expectation setting. Collaborative team-based care, rigorous application of perioperative milestones, and proactive postoperative care coordination were key elements. MEASUREMENTS: The intervention group was compared to historical controls with regard to demographics, risk factors, quality metrics, resource utilization and discharge disposition, the primary outcomes were hospital length of stay and postacute facility utilization. MAIN RESULTS: Compared to historical controls, the intervention group had similar risk factors and the same or better quality outcomes. It had less combined skilled nursing facility (SNF) and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) utilization compared to controls (16.5% vs. 27.5%). More intervention patients were discharged with home self-care compared to historical controls (10.7% vs 5.3%). During the intervention period combined SNF/IRF utilization decreased substantially from 19.8% early on, to 13.2% during a later phase. Intervention patients had fewer hospital days compared to historical controls (1.86 vs 3.34 days, respectively; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A perioperative population management oriented care model redesign was effective in decreasing hospital days and postacute facility-based care utilization, while quality metrics were maintained or improved.

Using quality improvement principles to improve the care of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis, an inflammatory response to an infection that may lead to severe organ dysfunction and death, is the leading cause of death in medical intensive care units. The Society of Critical Care Medicine has issued guidelines and promoted protocols to improve the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Generally, the medical community has been slow to adopt these guidelines because of the system challenges associated with protocol implementation. We describe an interdisciplinary team approach to the development and implementation of management protocols for treating patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: To determine the effectiveness of the bundled emergency department and critical care order sets developed by the Sepsis Steering Committee, we performed a case review of 1,105 sequential patients admitted to a large academic tertiary referral hospital with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock between July 2008 and January 2012. RESULTS: Implementation of the protocol led to improved order set use over time, a significant decrease in the median time to antibiotics of 140 (range 1-820) minutes in 2008 to 72 (range 1-1,020) minutes in 2011 (P≤0.001), and a decrease in median length of stay from 8 days (range 1-54) in 2008 to 7 days (range 1-33) in 2011 (P=0.036). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary team approach to sepsis management using protocols and early goal-directed therapy is feasible in a large academic medical center to improve the process of care and outcomes.