Comparison of Preseason and In-Season Practice and Game Loads in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Players.

Wellman, AD, Coad, SC, Flynn, PJ, Siam, TK, and McLellan, CP. A Comparison of preseason and in-season practice and game loads in NCAA Division I football players. J Strength Cond Res 33(4): 1020-1027, 2019-The aim of this study was to quantify the individual practice and game loads throughout the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football season to determine whether significant differences exist between the practice loads associated with the preseason training camp and those undertaken during the in-season period. Thirty-one NCAA Division I football players were monitored using the global positioning system and triaxial accelerometer (IA) (MinimaxX S5; Catapult Innovations, Melbourne, Australia) during 22 preseason practices, 36 in-season practices, and 12 competitions. The season was divided into 4 distinct phases for data analysis: preseason week 1 (preseason 1), preseason week 2 (preseason 2), preseason week 3 (preseason 3), and 12 in-season weeks. Individual IA data sets represented players from every offensive and defensive position group Wide Receiver (WR: n = 5), Offensive Line (OL: n = 4), Running Back (RB: n = 4), Quarterback (QB: n = 2), Tight End (TE: n = 3), Defensive Line (DL: n = 4), Linebacker (LB: n = 4), Defensive Back (DB: n = 5). Data were set at the practice level, where an observation for each player's maximum player load (PLMax) or mean player load (PLMean) from each training camp phase was referenced against each player's respective PL from each game, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday practice session. Notable results included significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater PLMax values attributed to preseason 1 compared with PL resulting from all in-season practices, and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher cumulative PL reported for preseason 1, 2, and 3 compared with every in-season week. Data from this study augment our understanding of the practice demands experienced by NCAA Division I college football players, and provide scope for the improvement of preseason practice design and physical conditioning strategies for coaches seeking to optimize performance.

Perceived Wellness Associated With Practice and Competition in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Players.

Wellman, AD, Coad, SC, Flynn, PJ, Siam, TK, and McLellan, CP. Perceived wellness associated with practice and competition in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players. J Strength Cond Res 33(1): 112-124, 2019-This study assessed the influence of movement demands resulting from weekly practice sessions and games, on perceived wellness measurements taken postgame (Sunday) and 48 hours pregame (Thursday) throughout the in-season period in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football players. Thirty players were monitored using global positioning system receivers (OptimEye S5; Catapult Innovations) during 12 games and 24 in-season practices. Movement variables included low-intensity distance, medium-intensity distance, high-intensity distance, sprint distance, total distance, player load, and acceleration and deceleration distance. Perceived wellness, including fatigue, soreness, sleep quality and quantity, stress, and mood, was examined using a questionnaire on a 1-5 Likert scale. Multilevel mixed linear regressions determined the differential effects of movement metrics on perceived wellness. Post hoc tests were conducted to evaluate the pairwise differentials of movement and significance for wellness ratings. Notable findings included significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less player load, low-intensity distance, medium-intensity distance, high-intensity distance, total distance, and acceleration and deceleration distance at all intensities, in those reporting more favorable (4-5) ratings of perceived fatigue and soreness on Sunday. Conversely, individuals reporting more favorable Sunday-perceived stress ratings demonstrated significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher player load, low-intensity and medium-intensity distance, total distance, low-intensity and medium-intensity deceleration distance, and acceleration distance at all intensities than individuals reporting less favorable (1-2) perceived stress ratings. Data from this study provide a novel investigation of perceived wellness associated with college football practice and competition. Results support the use of wellness questionnaires for monitoring perceived wellness in NCAA Division I college football players.