The importance of the mesofascial interface in complete mesocolic excision.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with Central Vascular Ligation (CVL) is progressively gaining acceptance as the most updated surgical treatment in the multimodal management of colonic cancer. The concept is based on excision of the affected organ with its related primitive dorsal mesenterium as an intact package to maximize local clearance, and high tie ligation to boost regional control, translating the original concept of Total Mesorectal Excision proposed by Heald for rectal cancer. Aim of this review is to analyze the modern concept of the mesenteric organ, with particular regard to the interfaces between its single components and the importance of the meso-fascial interface as the correct plane of separation. The integrity of the mesocolon excised along the meso-fascial interface (meso-fascial separation) prevents any breach of its surface and underlying structures, preserving the radial margin and the complex network of the meso-structure, avoiding any spillage of neoplastic cells within the surgical field. Central Vascular ligation allows for the most effective harvesting of lymph nodes, particularly of the apical ones, whose removal appears to be crucial in optimizing regional control. A surgical plane developed along the meso-fascial interface, coupled with high tie ligation, yields higher quality of surgical specimen, with better oncologic outcome in terms of local recurrence rate, disease-free and overall survival.

Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure.

There are several techniques described to close the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and usefulness of the Hem-o-lok clip for the closure of appendicular stump, comparing these data with those concerning the endo-loop. We conducted a retrospective study that compared two groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 2010 to 2015 at our institution. We used the Endoloop to close the stump in the first group (group I) and the Hem-o-lok in the second group (group II). We reviewed patient's data including: complications, operative time, length of stay, costs. There were 121 patients in group I and 138 patients in group II. The mean operative times were 40.5 min in group I and 36.4 min in the group II. No intraoperative complications and no mortality were observed in either group. The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was similar for both groups. There was no rehospitalization after discharge. The complication rate did not reach statistical significance between the groups. The cost of the procedure using the Hem-o-lok has been lower than using the Endoloop. Both the Endoloop and Hem-o-lok are safe for the closure of the appendicular stump. Hem-o-lok appears to be superior than Endoloop in terms of easeness of use and cheapness, maintaining the same safety.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in 600 right total mesocolectomies: Safety, prognostic factors and oncologic outcome.

BACKGROUND: To analyze our experience with laparoscopic right Mesocolectomy in right colonic cancers. METHODS: 600 consecutive patients were studied. RESULTS: Mortality was 0.5%; morbidity was 35.5%. Mean mesocolic area was 15339 ± 1639 mm3, specimen length 24.3 ± 3.3 cm, distance from the tumor to high tie was 103 ± 6 mm and mean lymph nodes harvested was 27 ± 3; mesocolic plane was achieved in 81% of cases. Survival was 83%; stratified survival in patients with stage II, IIIA/B and in the subgroup of stage IIIC patients with negative apical nodes was 88.7%, 72.4%, 71.4% respectively; stage IIIC patients with positive apical nodes showed poor survival (27.7%). Recurrence occurred in 177 patients (29.5%) and was mainly systemic (22.7%). At the multivariate analysis, "non mesocolic" plane of resection, positive N3 apical nodes and CEA levels >5 ng/dL were found to be independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic right Mesocolectomy showed to be safe and yielded surgical specimens of high quality, with impact on survival; positive N3 apical nodes and "non mesocolic" planes were independently associated to poor outcome.

Anaphylactic Reaction during Implantation of Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

The Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System is a trimodular endoprosthesis planned to overcome the limitations of currently available stent grafts, allowing complex iliac and femoral access and providing a proximal seal in challenge infrarenal neck morphology. The proximal sealing is achieved by means of a network of inflatable rings filled with low-viscosity radiopaque polyethylene glycol-based polymer during stent-graft deployment. The leakage of polymer outside the channel to fill the rings into the vascular system may induce an hypersensitivity reaction and anaphylactic shock. We report a case of anaphylactic reaction during Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System implantation. The endovascular procedure was successfully concluded.

"Ultra" E.R.A.S. in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: discharge after the first flatus? A prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) programs are now widely accepted in colonic laparoscopic resections because of faster recovery and less perioperative complications. The aim of this study was to assess safety and feasibility of discharging patients operated on by laparoscopic colectomy on postoperative day 2, so long as the first flatus has passed and in the absence of complication-related symptoms. METHODS: This study was a non-inferiority, open-label, single-center, prospective, randomized study comparing "Ultra" to Classic E.R.A.S. with discharge on POD 2 and 4, respectively. Seven hundred and sixty-five patients with resectable non-metastatic colonic cancer were analyzed: 384 patients were assigned to "Ultra" E.R.A.S. and 381 to Classic E.R.A.S. Primary end-point was mortality; secondary end-points were morbidity, readmission and reoperation rate. Limitations are: it is a single-center experience; it is not double-blind, with the intrinsic risk of intentional or unconscious bias; exclusion criteria because of "non-compliance" may be considered arbitrary. RESULTS: Mortality was 0.89 % in "Ultra" E.R.A.S. group and 0.59 % in Classic E.R.A.S. (p = 0.571). Morbidity was 34.1 % for "Ultra" E.R.A.S. arm and 35.4 % for Classic E.R.A.S. (p = 0.753). Readmissions were 5.6 % for "Ultra" E.R.A.S. and 5.9 % for Classic E.R.A.S. (p = 0.359). Reoperation rate was 3.8 % for "Ultra" ERAS and 4.7 % for Classic E.R.A.S. (p = 0.713). Multivariate regression analyses using Cox's proportional hazard model showed that mortality (primary end-point), morbidity, reoperation and readmission (secondary end-points) were not significantly influenced by the two different perioperative regimens; conversely, the global cost of "Ultra" E.R.A.S. regimen was more economically effective. CONCLUSION: "Ultra" E.R.A.S. showed to be safe, actual and effective; discharge on postoperative day 2 after the first flatus passage, in the absence of complication-related symptoms, should be actively considered in a modern, multidisciplinary, multimodal laparoscopic management of colonic cancer.

Combined brachial embolectomy and stent graft endovascular exclusion in the treatment of acute arm ischemia due to subclavian artery aneurysms thrombosis or distal embolization.

AIM: Purpose of this study is to report our results after simultaneous transbrachial embolectomy and endovascular aneurysm exclusion with stentgraft in the treatment of upper limb acute ischemia due to subclavian artery aneurysm thrombosis and embolization . METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2015, seven consecutive patients (6 men; mean age 71.5, range 44-85) underwent to emergent revascularization for upper limb ischemia due to thrombosis/embolization of SAA by means of brachial embolectomy and endovascular exclusion. Demographics, clinical, surgical data, complications and survival were recorded. Univariate analysis by chi-square was carried out to evaluate the role of demographics data and risk factors variables on reconstruction patency rate. Primary, primary assisted and secondary patency and limb salvage were calculated using the Kaplan Meyer's life table method. RESULTS: Successful treatment was achieved in all cases. No postoperative death or complications occurred. Primary and assisted primary patency rates at 1 and 3 years were respectively 85.7%, 71.4% and 100%.Secondary patency and limb salvage at 1 and 3 years was 100%. A fatal ischemic stroke occurred in 1 case at 6 months (14.2%). A redo PTA was carried out at 24 months. Univariate analysis showed as demographics data and risk factor variables did not influence the primary, assisted primary, secondary patency rate and limb salvage. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair is a less invasive alternative to open repair especially in high risk patients. long term results must still be confirmed in further studies. KEY WORDS: Arm ischemia, Endovascular treatment, Subclavian aneurysm.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: A comprehensive review.

Aim of the study is to comprehensively review the latest trends in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) for the multimodal management of right colon cancer. Historical and up-to-date anatomo-embryological concepts are analyzed in detail, focusing on the latest studies of the mesenteric organ, its dissection by mesofascial and retrofascial cleavage planes, and questioning the need for a new terminology in colonic resections. The rationale behind Laparoscopic CME with CVL is thoroughly investigated and explained. Attention is paid to the current surgical techniques and the quality of the surgical specimen, yielded through mesocolic, intramesocolic and muscularis propria plane of surgery. We evaluate the impact on long term oncologic outcome in terms of local recurrence, overall and disease-free survival, according to the plane of resection achieved. Conclusions are drawn on the basis of the available evidence, which suggests a pivotal role of laparoscopic CME with CVL in the multimodal management of right sided colonic cancer: performed in the right mesocolic plane of resection, laparoscopic CME with CVL demonstrates better oncologic results when compared to standard non-mesocolic planes of surgery, with all the advantages of laparoscopic techniques, both in faster recovery and better immunological response. The importance of minimally invasive meso-resectional surgery is thus stressed and highlighted as the new frontier for a modern laparoscopic total right mesocolectomy.

[Whole laparoacopic trans-hiatal extended total gastrectomy with the Or-Vil device: preliminary results in the treatment of Siewert type II and III tumors]. / Gastrectomia totale "trans-hiatally extended" totalmente laparoscopica con Or-Vil" device: risultati preliminari nel trattamento dei tumori Siewert tipo II e III.

Adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction is progressively rising in western countries and, because of its poor prognosis, presents a real clinical challenge for the oncological surgeon. We evaluate our initial experience with wholly laparoscopic trans-hiatal extended total gastrectomy with the Or-Vil device for treating Siewert type II and III tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction. Ten patients were enrolled in the present study; ASA score, stage of disease, length of surgery, estimated blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, length of proximal margin clearance, morbidity and mortality were analysed. Mortality was nil and morbidity 20%; the average proximal clearance margin was 5.7 cm and all margins were tumour-free (RO). The number of lymph nodes harvested was 38 +/- 19. Neither anastomotic fistulas nor major dehiscence were observed. In our initial experience, wholly laparoscopic trans-hiatal extended total gastrectomy for treating Siewert type II and III tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction is safe, effective and, according to our preliminary results, oncologically correct, but it remains a complex, advanced laparoscopic procedure, requiring major skills and adequate experience. Prospective, randomised trials--possibly multicentric--are required to establish its efficacy in terms of long-term oncological outcomes.

[Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for multifocal gastric GIST: a case report and review of the literature]. / Gastrectomia totale laparoscopica per GIST gastrico multifocale: caso clinico e revisione della letteratura.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the GI tract, deriving from interstitial Cajal cell degeneration. Over 95% of GISTs express CD-117 and CD-34, thus differing from other mesenchymal-derived tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with a multifocal GIST, treated by laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and review the literature. A 74-year-old man with a preoperative diagnosis of sub-cardial GIST, obtained by endoscopy, CT scan and endoscopic ultrasound, was submitted to laparoscopic total gastrectomy with an end-to-side oesophago-jejunal anastomosis, using the Or-Vil system. GISTs account for only 1% of all GI tumours, with a variable behaviour, from indolent forms to aggressive tumours with potential for hepatic and peritoneal metastasis. Surgery is the cornerstone of therapy, the aim being to obtain an R0 resection, so as to minimise the risk of recurrence. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is an excellent solution for their treatment, with possible adjuvant therapy based on imatinib-mesylate, for high-risk GIST.

A singular case of iatrogenic axillofemoral bypass disruption: a dramatic event treated by a lucky combined approach.

Proximal disruption of an axillofemoral bypass is a catastrophic event rarely caused by a posttraumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Herein, we present a 74-year-old man with a painful dislocation of the right shoulder that was successfully reduced. Three hours later he had hemodynamic shock with an expanding and pulsating hematoma at the level of the right shoulder, pectoral and infraclavicular region. Surgical exposure of the right brachial artery was carried out, and intraoperative angiography revealed a proximal anastomotic leakage. The distal ballooning improved the hemodynamic status, and by a redo infraclavicular incision the hematoma was drained. The arterial leak was repaired by an 8 mm polytetrafluoroethylene interposed graft between the axillary artery and existing graft. The utility of a combined approach (endovascular + open surgical) is discussed.

[Modulation of the extent of lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer. Review of the literature and role of laparoscopy]. / Modulazione dell'estensione della linfadenectomia nell' "early gastric cancer". Review della letteratura e ruolo della laparoscopia.

Early gastric cancer is a gastric carcinoma confined to the mucosa or submucosa of the stomach, regardless of the presence of nodal involvement, which in any event is present only in about 20% of patients. This uncommon nodal involvement is a distinct clinical problem, because standard D2 lymphadenectomy constitutes overtreatment in more than 80% of patients. A review of the literature shows that the present surgical tendency for those patients who do not fulfill the Gotoda criteria (i.e. not amenable to an endoscopic mucosal or submucosal dissection) is to modulate the extent of the lymphadenectomy on the basis of the characteristics of the cancer: for mucosal early gastric cancers located in the upper third of the stomach, gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy is sufficient; if located in the middle third the extent should be D1 +alpha (D1 + n. 7), while if located in the distal third, D1 +beta (D1 + n. 7,8a,9) is the best option. In all these cases, minimally invasive surgery can be a valid option, with results which are comparable to those of open surgery, but with all the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. For submucosal early gastric cancers, D1 +beta lymphadenectomy is indicated for neoplasia > 20 mm and of the protuberance type, while, for all other submucosal early gastric cancers (> 20 mm and of the depressed type, penetrating more than 500 micron into the submucosal layer, not differentiated, with lymphovascular invasion), standard D2 lymphadenectomy is the safest oncological procedure. In these cases, too, the laparoscopic approach can be a safe option, even if it requires greater laparoscopic skill.

[Five-year oncological results of laparoscopic versus open left hemicolectomy]. / Emicolectomia sinistra laparoscopica versus open: risultati oncologici a 5 anni.

Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy is still uncommon in surgical practice, because of both an unjustified fear of oncological inadequacy and technical difficulties with a steep learning curve. The aim of the present study was to analyse our 5-year experience with laparoscopic left hemicolectomy and its short- and long-term results. Thirty patients with non-metastatic non-infiltrating left colon cancer were treated laparoscopically and retrospectively compared to a group treated laparotomically and well matched for age, comorbidity and stage of disease in respect to the laparoscopic group. The duration of the laparoscopic procedures was longer, but intraoperative blood loss, passage of flatus and hospital stay were significantly less. Morbidity was similar and there was no 30 days mortality in either group. Specimen length and number of harvested lymph nodes were similar and 5-year cumulative survival curves showed no significant statistical difference (73.1% laparoscopic vs 70.8% open). Today, laparoscopic colon procedures are rarely performed, due both to fear of oncological inadequacy and to technical difficulties, yet several recent trials have presented evidence of safety, and oncological results comparable to those of the open counterpart. Our 5-year experience confirms these studies: our short- and long-term results show no statistical differences between the laparoscopic and "open" procedure. Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy is a safe, effective and oncologically adequate surgical procedure for non-metastatic non-infiltrating left colon cancer and is therefore a valid option for the surgical treatment of these neoplasms.

[Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Oncological outcome at 5 years]. / Total mesorectal excision laparoscopica per cancro del retto extraperitoneale. Outcome oncologico a 5 anni.

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the cornerstone of surgical treatment for extraperitoneal rectal cancer. The aim of the present study was to analyse our five-year experience with laparoscopic TME, evaluating the overall five-year and disease-free survival rates. Twenty-five patients with low-middle rectal cancer were treated with laparoscopic TME. Patients with advanced rectal cancer were treated preoperatively with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Twenty-three ultralow anterior resections with Knight-Griffen anastomosis and 3 abdominoperineal resections were performed. At 30 days mortality was zero, while morbidity was 20% (all minor complications). The mean follow-up period was 30.5 months. Five-year overall survival was 80.2%, and five-year disease-free survival 80.9%. Our experience shows that laparoscopic TME is a safe and oncologically correct procedure. Oncologic outcomes were comparable to those reported in all major international experiences, and the results were very similar to those obtained with the laparotomic approach. However, it remains a complex technique, requiring an adequate learning curve. More prospective, randomised trials are needed in order to define laparoscopic TME as the new gold standard for the treatment of extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

[Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: 5-year oncology results]. / Emicolectomia destra laparoscopica versus open: risultati oncologici a 5 anni.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has developed less markedly than rectosigmoid resection, probably because of the more complicated regional anatomy and greater difficulty in performing an adequate regional lymphectomy. The aim of the present study was to analyse our 5-year experience with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Twenty patients were enrolled with non-metastatic, non-infiltrating right colonic cancer, treated laparoscopically and compared to a group well matched for age, sex, comorbidity and stage of disease, treated laparotomically. The duration of the laparoscopic procedures was slightly longer, but intraoperative blood loss, passage of flatus and hospital stay were reduced compared to the laparotomic procedure. Morbidity was similar and there was no 30-day mortality in either group. Specimen length and number of harvested lymph nodes were similar and the 5-year cumulative survival curves showed no statistically significant difference (72.5% versus 72.2%). Our experience shows that laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is a safe, effective and oncologically adequate procedure, comparable in all respects to open hemicolectomy, but with all the advantages of the minimally invasive technique. Yet, it remains a complex surgical procedure, requiring skill and a long learning curve. Further studies, possibly prospective and randomised, are necessary to define the exact role of this technique for the treatment of non-metastatic, non-infiltrating right colonic cancer.

[Latrogenic lesion of the inferior vena cava during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case report and review of the literature]. / Lesione iatrogena della vena cava inferiore durante colecistectomia laparoscopica: caso clinico e rassegna della letteratura.

Retroperitoneal great vessel injuries are a rare but dramatic complication of any minimally invasive procedure. We report a case of laceration of the anterior aspect of the inferior vena cava following insertion of the Verress needle during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A 32-year-old man was operated on for acute cholecystitis. During the insertion of the Verress needle, a laceration of the anterior aspect of the inferior vena cava occurred. Immediate conversion and suture of the vessel were performed. The patient did well and was discharged after 24 days because of postoperative pancreatitis, managed with medical therapy. Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures are rare but catastrophic complications which may endanger the patient's life. Over 75% of these lesions occur during insertion of the Verress needle or the Hasson trocar. Prompt diagnosis and immediate conversion are mandatory for correct management of these injuries so as to minimise morbidity and mortality.

Spontaneous rupture of the superficial femoral artery treated via an endovascular approach.

Isolated spontaneous rupture of the superficial femoral artery is very uncommon. To our knowledge, only 5 other cases have been reported in the medical literature. Herein, we report the case of an 86-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital with a 4-day history of progressive swelling of the left thigh. The presence of a pulsating mass with paresthesia of the lower limb and anemia suggested a hematoma of the thigh. A computed tomographic scan revealed a 4-cm-diameter pseudoaneurysm of the left superficial femoral artery and a large hematoma of the medial muscle compartment. A nitinol-polytetrafluoroethylene VIABAHN self-expanding stent-graft (5-mm diameterx50-mm length) was placed beyond the arterial lesion, and a fasciotomy of the thigh was performed. On the 10th postoperative day, the patient was discharged from the hospital in good condition. In cases of spontaneous swelling of the thigh in the absence of trauma or other apparent causes, spontaneous rupture of the superficial femoral artery should be suspected. Surgical treatment is preferable in young patients. In patients who are elderly or in poor condition, endovascular therapy is preferable when there is diffuse atherosclerosis of the artery.

Lower limb ischemia after migration of a coronary artery stent into the femoral artery.

A coronary stent may be lost in the peripheral or visceral arterial system with an incidence ranging from 0.9 to 8.4%, however, a limb or organ ischemia after stent migration is very uncommon. We report the case of an 83-year-old man who underwent coronary artery stenting at our Hospital's Cardiological Department. During this difficult procedure, due to the critical stenosis of the circumflex artery, the stent was accidentally lost and found at the level of the insertion of the right common femoral on the external iliac artery. After several attempts to rescue the stent through an omolateral and contralateral femoral approach with the hook technique, the right common, superficial and profunda femoral arteries were surgically exposed. The stent was easily removed from the origin of the profunda femoral artery by a longitudinal arteriotomy. Finally, the arteriotomy was closed with a homologous saphenous vein patch. We underline the importance of an early extraction of the stent, discussing the preferable surgical approach to minimize the possible dramatic complications in the peripheral artery system.