Lung transplant graft salvage using aortic homograft for bronchial dehiscence.

The use of aortic homograft in infective pathology is well described. Its use in the repair of post-transplant airway complications has been seldom reported. Herein, we report our experience with the successful use of aortic homograft in the management of post-transplant large airway complications in two patients.

Hybrid reconstruction of bronchial dehiscence following lung transplant.

Surgical repair of right-sided bronchial dehiscence post lung transplant is challenging. We report a hybrid reconstruction of the bronchus using an aortic homograft patch with stenting as a novel technique of management of ischemic airway injury following lung transplantation.

Lung transplant in a recipient with tracheal bronchus.

We describe the intraoperative surgical management of tracheal bronchus encountered in a lung transplant recipient.

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis of a bioprosthetic valve: Questions to ponder before replacement of the valve.

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) of bioprosthetic valves is extremely rare. We report a 67-year-old lady with early bioprosthetic "failure" that at reoperation was proven to be NBTE. The choice of a prosthesis in this condition may have implications for patients' late clinical course.

Acute ischaemic ventricular septal defect--a formidable surgical challenge.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate our surgical results for Acute Ischaemic Ventricular Septal Defect and suggest practice guidelines. METHODS: Retrospective review of data from patient records between 1992 and 2006 for presentation, surgical approaches, morbidity and mortality, statistically analysed to derive guidelines for management. RESULTS: We had 36 patients with a mean age of 70.44(+/-6.34) years. Fourteen patients had inferior defects. Twenty-eight patients were in shock (22 on pre-operative IABP). Severe LV and RV dysfunction were present in 18 and 20 patients respectively. At surgery, 17 had infarct resection with patching while 18 had repair with infarct exclusion. Concomitant CABG was performed in 15. One patient was re-operated on for mitral valve replacement and one for recurrent VSD. Recurrent VSD was common (11 patients). Two of these patients underwent percutaneous device closure of whom one died. Prolonged ICU and hospital stay was normal. Early mortality was 52.78% (inferior defects-85.71% and anterior defects-31.82%). Inferior VSD (OR 7.7) and pre-operative shock (OR 6.7), predicted mortality. The subgroup of inferior VSD with shock had mortality equating that with medical management published in literature. CONCLUSIONS: Acute Ischaemic VSD is a grim surgical disease marked by residual shunts and high mortality. Patients with inferior defects with shock should be offered surgery only under exceptional circumstances.

Intermittent wound perfusion for postoperative pain relief following upper abdominal surgery: a surgeon's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Although there are many methods for postoperative pain management, implementation may be limited in some settings due to practical or financial constraints. Simple, inexpensive and easily implemented analgesic methods may improve access to effective pain relief. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing truncal vagotomy and gastrojejunostomy for pyloric stenosis secondary to chronic duodenal ulceration were studied in this prospective randomized trial. Subjects were assigned to receive either wound perfusion with 8 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 5 hours through a catheter placed subcutaneously or intravenous pethidine 0.2 mg/kg on demand for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative pain scores at rest were measured by visual analog scale and the opioid requirement at 0-12 hours, at 12-24 hours and at 24-36 hours were compared. Changes in respiratory parameters were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Pain scores at 0-12 hours were significantly lower in the wound perfusion group compared with the intravenous pethidine group (5.7 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.2, mean +/- SD; P < 0.001). The number of doses of analgesic required in the wound perfusion group was significantly lower compared with the controls during the 36 hours of study (3.5 +/- 1.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 1.0, P < 0.001). There were no differences in respiratory parameters, vital capacity, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow rate between the two groups. The FEV1:FVC ratio, however, was significantly higher in the intravenous pethidine group. There were no wound complications due to catheter placement or systemic toxicity due to the anesthetic. CONCLUSION: Intermittent wound perfusion with 0.25% bupivacaine is a safe and efficient method to reduce pain scores and opioid requirement in the early postoperative period. Wound perfusion, however, had no beneficial effect on the postoperative respiratory function.