Skin Ulcers are Predictors of 30-Day Hospital Readmission, But are Under-represented in the DRG Coding: A Retrospective Case-Control Study From an Italian Internal Medicine Unit.

This study retrospectively analyzes all consecutive patients who underwent during a year hospital readmissions, defined as an admission to a hospital within 30 days of discharge, to an Italian Internal Medicine ward. All these data were compared with those from patients who underwent only 1 hospital admission in the same period. The aim of this study was to identify potential novel risk factors for hospital readmissions. In 2018, a total of 3012 patients were hospitalized. Among these, 14.1% (n = 426; mean age, 79.7 ± 11.9; range, 23-100) were defined as readmissions; data were compared with controls (n = 420; 13.9%; mean age, 75.9 ± 14.7; range, 22-99) who had only 1 hospitalization. Cases showed a significantly higher prevalence than controls regarding cerebrovascular disease (77.2% vs 48.1%), cognitive impairment (51.8% vs 26.9%), congestive heart failure (47.6% vs 20.2%), chronic kidney disease (31.7% vs 13.1%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23.0% vs 14.5%). Skin ulcers were significantly more prevalent among cases (45.1% vs 17.6%). Diagnosis-related group (DRG) analysis showed a higher proportion of "infectious disease" (24.4% vs 15.0%) among the cases than in controls. Despite skin ulcers were very frequent among cases and controls (45.1% vs 17.6%), they were codified as "skin wound" DRG only in 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively. At the DRGs analysis, sepsis (31.6% vs 19.1%), pneumonia (17.1% vs 7.6%), and kidney failure (9.6% vs 3.8%) represented the main significant cause of death in cases compared to controls. Our study confirms that readmissions to Internal Medicine departments are related to the severity of chronic diseases affecting patients. Skin ulcers are present in about half of patients who will be early readmitted within 30 days, but they are almost never reported in DRGs, so more accurate coding is needed. Key challenges for the future are sepsis prevention measures and investing resources in chronic disease assistance, including skin ulcer chronic management.

"It Can Be Hard But It's Not Bad": Three Questions to Solicit Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Burdens to Participating in Pediatric Palliative Care Research.

Background: To allay uneasiness among clinicians and institutional review board members about pediatric palliative care research and to yield new knowledge relevant to study methods, documenting burdens and benefits of this research on children and their families is essential. Design: In a grounded theory study with three data points (T1, T2, and T3), we evaluated benefits and burdens of family caregiver participation at T3. English-speaking caregivers participating in palliative or end-of-life decisions for their child with incurable cancer or their seriously ill child in the intensive care unit participated. Thirty-seven caregivers (n = 22 from oncology; n = 15 from intensive care) of 33 children completed T3 interviews; most were mothers (n = 25, 67.6%), African American (n = 18, 48.6%), and married (n = 28, 75.7%). Measurement: Benefits and burdens were assessed by three open-ended questions asked by an interviewer during a scheduled telephone contact. Responses were analyzed using descriptive semantic content analysis techniques and themes were extracted. Results: All 37 T3 participants completed the 3 questions, resulting in no missing data. The most frequently reported themes were of positive personal impact: "Hoping to help others," "Speaking about what is hard is important," and "Being in the study was sometimes hard but not bad." Conclusions: No caregiver described the study as burdensome. Some acknowledged that answering the questions could evoke sad memories, but highlighted benefits for self and others. Attrition somewhat tempers the emphasis on benefits. Documenting perceived benefits and burdens in a standardized manner may accurately convey impact of study participation and yield new knowledge.