Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin tolerance in haemodialysis patients during COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis patients are at risk of developing severe forms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In March 2020, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZI) were proposed as potential treatments of COVID-19, but with warnings concerning their possible toxicity. No data are available regarding the toxicity of this treatment in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: We report the use of HCQ and AZI in a cohort of COVID-19 haemodialysis patients with focus on safety concerns. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received 200 mg HCQ thrice daily during 10 days, and AZI 500 mg on Day 1, and 250 mg on the four following days. HCQ plasma concentrations were within the recommended range (0.1-1.0 µg/mL) in all patients except one, in which maximum concentration was 1.1 µg/mL. HCQ concentration raised until the third day and remained stable thereafter. No cardiac event occurred in spite of progressive lengthening of corrected QT interval (QTc) during the treatment. One patient experienced a long QTc syndrome (QTc >500 ms) without any arrhythmia episode, although HCQ concentration was in the target range. Five (23.8%) patients experienced hypoglycaemia, a well-known HCQ side-effect. SARS-CoV-2 RNA remained detectable in nasopharyngeal swabs for a long time in haemodialysis patients (mean time 21 days). CONCLUSIONS: HCQ and AZI are safe in haemodialysis patients at these doses but can lead to long QTc syndrome and hypoglycaemia. HCQ concentrations were not correlated with side effects. We recommend monitoring of the QTc length throughout treatment, as well as glycaemia. SARS-CoV-2 could persist for longer in haemodialysis patients than in the general population.

Haemodialysis patients with diabetes eat less than those without: A plea for a permissive diet.

AIM: The main cause of malnutrition in haemodialysis patients is a spontaneous decline in energy and protein intakes. This study aims to report the dietary energy intake (DEI), dietary protein intake (DPI), and dietary micronutrient intake in a French HD population, to report factors associated with a low DPI and DEI, and to analyze if nutritional intake was correlated with nutritional status. METHODS: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study in a haemodialysis population of 87 adult patients in July 2014. Daily nutritional oral intake, handgrip strength, body composition measured by bioimpedancemetry, and biological and dialysis parameters were obtained from medical records. Statistical analyses of parameters associated with DEI and DPI were performed. RESULTS: The median age (interquartile range) of the population was 77.3 [71.1; 84.8] years, 57.5% were men, and 52.9% had diabetes mellitus. Median weight-adjusted DEI was 18.4 [15.7;22.3] kcal/kg per day (1308 [1078; 1569] kcal/day), and median weight-adjusted DPI was 0.80 [0.66; 0.96] g/kg per day (57.5 [47.1; 66.8] g/day). In multivariate analysis, weight-adjusted DEI was statistically lower in patients with diabetes (coefficient [95%CI] -3.81[-5.21;-2.41] kcal/kg per day; P = 0.01) but was not associated with the others parameters. When DEI was not adjusted for weight, diabetes was no longer associated with DEI, but female gender (-178[-259;-961] kcal/day; P = 0.03) and a higher Charlson comorbidity index (-30[-44;-15]; P = 0.04) were associated with a lower calorie intake. Results for DPI were similar except that the Charlson comorbidity index did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is an important factor associated with low dietary intake in haemodialysis patients. Restrictive regimens should be prescribed cautiously in haemodialysis patients, especially in those with diabetes.

The "Dose-Effect" Relationship Between 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Muscle Strength in Hemodialysis Patients Favors a Normal Threshold of 30 ng/mL for Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D.

OBJECTIVE: Muscle strength is weakened in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Strength is both a measure of a functional parameter and of frailty as it is independently associated with mortality. In the general population, observational studies show that plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) is positively correlated with muscle strength and function. We analyzed the determinants of muscle strength measured by handgrip and 25(OH)D in a maintenance hemodialysis population. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, data from all hemodialysis patients from our nephrology department were recorded in July 2014. Daily nutritional oral intake, handgrip strength, body composition measured by bioimpedancemetry analysis, as well as biological and dialysis parameters, were obtained from medical files. We used a linear regression model to assess nutritional, biological, and dialysis parameters as well as body composition associated with handgrip strength. RESULTS: The median age (interquartile range) of the 130 included patients was 77.3 (69.5-84.7) years, 57.7% were men, and 50.8% had diabetes mellitus. Median handgrip strength value (interquartile range) was 14.3 (10.6-22.2) kg. In univariate analyses, the factors associated with handgrip strength were age, gender, albumin, transthyretin, predialysis creatinine and urea, normalized protein nitrogen appearance, lean mass, and muscle mass measured by bioimpedancemetry analysis as well as phase angle, and 25(OH)D. In multivariate analyses, lower age, male gender, higher albumin, higher muscle mass, and 25(OH)D level ≥ 30 ng/mL were independently correlated with muscle strength measured by handgrip. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a positive correlation between plasma 25(OH)D and muscle strength measured by handgrip in hemodialysis patients. We report a "dose-effect" relationship between 25(OH)D and handgrip strength under 30 ng/mL, which is no more present above 30 ng/mL. Prospective randomized studies are needed to prove that supplementation with cholecalciferol, leading to 25(OH)D levels ≥ 30 ng/mL, improves muscle strength in hemodialysis patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a 1-year randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is controversial because of the lack of clear benefit of the immunosuppressive regimens on patient or renal survival. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for patients with MGN. STUDY DESIGN: 1-year prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 36 patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MGN and nephrotic syndrome. INTERVENTION: 19 patients received MMF (2 g/d) for 12 months and 17 patients were in the control group. All patients had the same conservative treatment based on renin-angiotensin blockers, statins, low-salt and low-protein diet, and diuretics in case of edema. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: End points were the mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio in mg/g throughout the study and numbers of complete and partial remissions at 1 year (month 12). Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio was stable in both groups throughout the study (P = 0.1). Mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio was 4,690 +/- 2,212 mg/g in the MMF group and 6,548 +/- 4,601 mg/g in the control group (95% confidence interval of the difference, -619 to +4,247; P = 0.1). Remission was complete in 3 patients (1 in the MMF group, 2 in the control group; P = 0.5) and partial in 11 patients (6 in the MMF group, 5 in the control group; P = 0.9). The probability of complete or partial remission did not differ between the 2 groups after 12 months (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.75; P = 0.7). Kidney function was stable in the 2 groups according to estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine level. LIMITATIONS: The small number of patients and short follow-up prevent generalizations. CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month regimen of MMF did not decrease mean proteinuria over creatinuria ratio or increase partial and complete remissions. Serious adverse effects were observed in 4 patients (20%) receiving MMF.