Assessing evidence quality in research reporting neurocognitive outcomes following paediatric temporal lobe surgery for epilepsy.

PURPOSE: RCTs are the gold standard in determining intervention efficacy with journal impact factor assumed to index research quality. Flint et al's (2017) systematic review examined neurocognitive outcomes following paediatric temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Retrieved evidence was restricted to non-RCTs, which pose greater risk of bias and thus diminish research quality. The current study evaluated risk of bias in sources retrieved by Flint et al. and explored whether impact factor related to research quality within this selected field. METHODS: Methodological and reporting bias was evaluated using categories of bias specified by Cochrane. The relationship between the identified number of biases and journal impact factors of retrieved sources was examined. RESULTS: All studies carried substantial risk for bias. Methodology bias included low sample size (76.71%; 56/73), risk of confounding cognitive outcomes due to failure to report pre-surgery neurocognitive data (21.92%; 16/73) and to determine whether patients were prescribed antiepileptic drugs at follow-up (53.42%; 39/73). Reporting bias included overstating claims based on findings (53.42%; 39/73), failure to report individual patient characteristics (66%; 33/50) and omitting the nature of surgical interventions (15.07%; 11/73). The number of sources of common bias within studies was not associated significantly with journal impact factor (p = .878). CONCLUSION: This evaluation highlights risk of bias when sources are predominantly uncontrolled non-RCTs and provides evidence that journal impact factor is not a reliable indicator of quality within this field. Authors should limit bias in their methods and reporting of results, to ensure the highest quality evidence possible is used to inform treatment decisions and prognosis.

Neurocognitive, academic and functional outcomes in survivors of infant ependymoma (UKCCSG CNS 9204).

PURPOSE: This is the first UK multi-centre case-controlled study with follow-up in excess of 10 years to report the neurocognitive, academic and psychological outcomes of individuals diagnosed with a brain tumour in early childhood. Children enrolled into the UKCCSG CNS 9204 trial, diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma when aged ≤ 36 months old, who received a primary chemotherapy strategy to defer or avoid radiotherapy, were recruited. METHODS: Outcomes of those who relapsed and subsequently received radiotherapy (n = 13) were compared to those enrolled who did not relapse (n = 16), age-matched controls-diagnosed with solid non-central nervous system (SN-CNS; n = 15) tumours or low-grade posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytoma (PFPA; n = 15), and normative data. Analyses compared nine neurocognitive outcomes as primary measures with quality of survival as secondary measures. RESULTS: Relapsed ependymoma participants performed significantly worse than their non-relapsed counterparts on measures of Full Scale IQ, Perceptual Reasoning, Word Reading and Numerical Operations. The relapsed ependymoma group performed significantly worse than SN-CNS controls on all primary measures, whereas non-relapsing participants only differed significantly from SN-CNS controls on measures of Processing Speed and General Memory. Relapsed ependymoma participants fared worse than all groups on measures of quality of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The relapsed irradiated ependymoma group demonstrated the most significantly impaired neurocognitive outcomes at long-term follow-up. Non-relapsing participants demonstrated better outcomes than those who relapsed. Results tentatively suggest avoiding radiotherapy helped preserve neurocognitive and learning outcomes of individuals diagnosed with ependymoma when aged ≤ 36 months old. Prospective neurocognitive surveillance is required. Recommendations for clinical and research practice are provided.

Pre-surgical mapping of eloquent cortex for paediatric epilepsy surgery candidates: Evidence from a review of advanced functional neuroimaging.

PURPOSE: A review of all published evidence for mapping eloquent (motor, language and memory) cortex using advanced functional neuroimaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI] and magnetoencephalography [MEG]) for paediatric epilepsy surgery candidates has not been conducted previously. Research in this area has predominantly been in adult populations and applicability of these techniques to paediatric populations is less established. METHODS: A review was performed using an advanced systematic search and retrieval of all published papers examining the use of functional neuroimaging for paediatric epilepsy surgery candidates. RESULTS: Of the 2724 papers retrieved, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Total paediatric participants identified were 353 with an age range of 5 months-19 years. Sample sizes and comparisons with alternative investigations to validate techniques are small and variable paradigms are used. Sensitivity 0.72 (95% CI 0.52-0.86) and specificity 0.60 (95% CI 0.35-0.92) values with a Positive Predictive Value of 74% (95% CI 61-87) and a Negative Predictive Value of 65% (95% CI 52-78) for fMRI language lateralisation with validation, were obtained. Retrieved studies indicate evidence that both fMRI and MEG are able to provide information lateralising and localising motor and language functions. CONCLUSIONS: A striking finding of the review is the paucity of studies (n=34) focusing on the paediatric epilepsy surgery population. For children, it remains unclear which language and memory paradigms produce optimal activation and how these should be quantified in a statistically robust manner. Consensus needs to be achieved for statistical analyses and the uniformity and yield of language, motor and memory paradigms. Larger scale studies are required to produce patient series data which clinicians may refer to interpret results objectively. If functional imaging techniques are to be the viable alternative for pre-surgical mapping of eloquent cortex for children, paradigms and analyses demonstrating concordance with independent measures must be developed.

Improving access to pediatric neurorehabilitation for patients with moderate and severe head injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of severely injured children in England have a significant head injury and will be seen in Major Trauma Centers (MTCs). The period following brain injury represents an opportunity to influence recovery of neurological function. The study sought to determine whether children who had sustained a head injury were referred for neurorehabilitation. METHOD: The study was conducted over one year at one center. Children sustaining a moderate or severe head injury were identified and compared to those referred for neurorehabilitation. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were identified; 16/41 (39%) were referred for neurorehabilitation. Group comparison revealed significant associations between referral status and age (X2(3) = 8.35, p = 0.039), injury mechanism (X2(1) = 8.12, p = 0.017), injury severity (X2(1) = 21.3, p < 0.000), and imaging findings (X2(1) = 11.71, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: Data reveal concerns for access to neurorehabilitation. Improved access to neurorehabilitation permitting long-term follow-up is required. The establishment of MTCs provides an opportunity to enact this.

Interventions for managing weight change following paediatric acquired brain injury: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review literature reporting interventions for weight change following paediatric acquired brain injury (ABI). METHOD: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using advanced search techniques. The retrieval identified 1562 papers, of which 30 were relevant. The total number of paediatric participants was 759. RESULTS: There is a paucity of higher quality evidence to support the use of weight change interventions following paediatric ABI. Substantial variation in screening, outcome measures, intervention, and reporting were demonstrated. Some support was found for the use of hypothalamic-sparing surgery as a method to prevent obesity following craniopharyngioma resection. INTERPRETATION: There is a need for further study in this area to inform clinical and research practice; recommendations are given.