Mechanisms of Action of TMS in the Treatment of Depression.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is entering increasingly widespread use in treating depression. The most common stimulation target, in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), emerged from early neuroimaging studies in depression. Recently, more rigorous casual methods have revealed whole-brain target networks and anti-networks based on the effects of focal brain lesions and focal brain stimulation on depression symptoms. Symptom improvement during therapeutic DLPFC-TMS appears to involve directional changes in signaling between the DLPFC, subgenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and salience-network regions. However, different networks may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms for other TMS targets in depression, such as dorsomedial prefrontal cortex or orbitofrontal cortex. The durability of therapeutic effects for TMS involves synaptic neuroplasticity, and specifically may depend upon dopamine acting at the D1 receptor family, as well as NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity mechanisms. Although TMS protocols are classically considered 'excitatory' or 'inhibitory', the actual effects in individuals appear quite variable, and might be better understood at the level of populations of synapses rather than individual synapses. Synaptic meta-plasticity may provide a built-in protective mechanism to avoid runaway facilitation or inhibition during treatment, and may account for the relatively small number of patients who worsen rather than improve with TMS. From an ethological perspective, the antidepressant effects of TMS may involve promoting a whole-brain attractor state associated with foraging/hunting behaviors, centered on the rostrolateral periaqueductal gray and salience network, and suppressing an attractor state associated with passive threat defense, centered on the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray and default-mode network.

Critically Assessing the Unanswered Questions of How, Where, and When to Induce Plasticity in the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Network with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Extinction of traumatic memory, a primary treatment approach (termed exposure therapy) in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), occurs through relearning and may be subserved at the molecular level by long-term potentiation (LTP) of relevant circuits. In parallel, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is thought to work through LTP-like mechanisms and may provide a novel, safe, and effective treatment for PTSD. Our recent failed randomized controlled trial (1) emphasizes the necessity of correctly identifying cortical targets, directionality of TMS protocol, and role of memory activation. Here we provide a systematic review of TMS for PTSD to further identify how, where, and when TMS treatment should be delivered to alleviate PTSD symptoms. We conducted a systematic review of the literature searching for rTMS clinical trials involving PTSD patients and outcomes. We searched MEDLINE through October 25th, 2023 for "TMS and PTSD" and "transcranial magnetic stimulation and posttraumatic stress disorder." Thirty-one publications met our inclusion criteria (k=17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), k=14 open label). RCT protocols were varied in TMS protocols, cortical TMS targets, and memory activation protocols. There was no clear superiority across protocols of low-frequency (k=5) vs. high-frequency protocols (k=6), or by stimulation location. Memory provocation or exposure protocols (k=7) appear to enhance response. Overall, TMS appears to be effective in treating PTSD symptoms across a variety of TMS frequencies, hemispheric target differences, and exposure protocols. Disparate protocols may be conceptually harmonized when viewed as potentiating proposed anxiolytic networks or suppressing anxiogenic networks.

A new angle on transcranial magnetic stimulation coil orientation: A targeted narrative review.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, where it is effective in approximately half of patients for whom pharmacological approaches have failed. Treatment response is related to stimulation parameters such as the stimulation frequency, pattern, intensity, location, total number of pulses and sessions applied, as well as target brain network engagement. One critical but underexplored component of the stimulation procedure is the orientation or yaw angle of the commonly used figure-of-eight TMS coil, which is known to impact neuronal response to TMS. However, coil orientation has remained largely unchanged since TMS was first used to treat depression and continues to be based on motor cortex anatomy which may not be optimal for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex treatment site. This targeted narrative review evaluates experimental, clinical, and computational evidence indicating that optimizing coil orientation may potentially improve TMS treatment outcomes. The properties of the electric field induced by TMS, the changes to this field caused by the differing conductivities of head tissues, and the interaction between coil orientation and the underlying cortical anatomy are summarized. We describe evidence that the magnitude and site of cortical activation, surrogate markers of TMS dosing and brain network targeting considered central in clinical response to TMS, are influenced by coil orientation. We suggest that coil orientation should be considered when applying therapeutic TMS and propose several approaches to optimizing this potentially important treatment parameter.

Specific Association of Worry With Amyloid-ß But Not Tau in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Anxiety disorders and subsyndromal anxiety symptoms are highly prevalent in late life. Recent studies support that anxiety may be a neuropsychiatric symptom during preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and that higher anxiety is associated with more rapid cognitive decline and progression to cognitive impairment. However, the associations of specific anxiety symptoms with AD pathologies and with co-occurring subjective and objective cognitive changes have not yet been established. METHODS: Baseline data from the A4 and Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration studies were analyzed. Older adult participants (n = 4,486) underwent assessments of anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 item version [STAI]), and cerebral amyloid-beta (Aß; 18F-florbetapir) PET and a subset underwent tau (18F-flortaucipir) PET. Linear regressions estimated associations of Aß in a cortical composite and tau in the amygdala, entorhinal, and inferior temporal regions with STAI-Total and individual STAI item scores. Models adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, depression, Apolipoprotein ε4 genotype, and subjective and objective cognition (Cognitive Function Index-participant; Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite). RESULTS: Greater Aß deposition was significantly associated with higher STAI-Worry, adjusting for all covariates, but not with other STAI items or STAI-Total scores. In mediation analyses, the association of Aß with STAI-Worry was partially mediated by subjective cognition with a stronger direct effect. No associations were found for regional tau deposition with STAI-Total or STAI-Worry score. CONCLUSION: Greater worry was associated with Aß but not tau deposition, independent of subjective and objective cognition in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. These findings implicate worry as an early, specific behavioral marker and a possible therapeutic target in preclinical AD.

Causal network localization of brain stimulation targets for trait anxiety.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) can treat some neuropsychiatric disorders, but there is no consensus approach for identifying new targets. We localized causal circuit-based targets for anxiety that converged across multiple natural experiments. Lesions (n=451) and TMS sites (n=111) that modify anxiety mapped to a common normative brain circuit (r=0.68, p=0.01). In an independent dataset (n=300), individualized TMS site connectivity to this circuit predicted anxiety change (p=0.02). Subthalamic DBS sites overlapping the circuit caused more anxiety (n=74, p=0.006), thus demonstrating a network-level effect, as the circuit was derived without any subthalamic sites. The circuit was specific to trait versus state anxiety in datasets that measured both (p=0.003). Broadly, this illustrates a pathway for discovering novel circuit-based targets across neuropsychiatric disorders.

A potential neuromodulation target for PTSD in Veterans derived from focal brain lesions.

Neuromodulation trials for PTSD have yielded mixed results, and the optimal neuroanatomical target remains unclear. We analyzed three datasets to study brain circuitry causally linked to PTSD in military Veterans. After penetrating traumatic brain injury (n=193), lesions that reduced probability of PTSD were preferentially connected to a circuit including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), amygdala, and anterolateral temporal lobe (cross-validation p=0.01). In Veterans without lesions (n=180), PTSD was specifically associated with connectivity within this circuit (p<0.01). Connectivity change within this circuit correlated with PTSD improvement after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (n=20) (p<0.01), even though the circuit was not directly targeted. Finally, we directly targeted this circuit with fMRI-guided accelerated TMS, leading to rapid resolution of symptoms in a patient with severe lifelong PTSD. All results were independent of depression severity. This lesion-based PTSD circuit may serve as a neuromodulation target for Veterans with PTSD.

Older age associated with better antidepressant response to H1-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation in female patients.

BACKGROUND: TMS is increasingly used to treat depression, but predictors of treatment outcomes remain unclear. We assessed the association between age and TMS response given inconsistent prior reports limited by small sample size, heterogeneity, outdated TMS parameters, lack of assessment of H1-coil TMS, and lack of an a priori hypothesis. We hypothesized that older age would be associated with better treatment response based on trends in recent large exploratory analyses. METHODS: We conducted a naturalistic retrospective analysis of patients (n = 378) ages 18-80 with depression (baseline Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) > 5) who received 29-35 sessions of TMS between 2014 and 2021. Response was assessed using percent reduction of QIDS-SR. The relationship between percent response or remission and age group was assessed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: 85 % of patients received the standard protocol of H1-coil TMS to the left DLPFC. Percent response and remission rates for the entire study sample increased with age (response: p = .026; remission: p = .0023). This finding was stronger in female patients (response: p = .0033; remission: p = .00098) and was not observed in male patients (response: p = .73; remission: p = .26). This was confirmed in a sub-analysis of patients who only received the standard protocol with the H1-coil for the entire treatment course. LIMITATIONS: Naturalistic retrospective analysis from one academic center. CONCLUSIONS: Older age is associated with a better antidepressant response to H1-coil TMS in female patients. This was demonstrated in a hypothesis-driven confirmation of prior exploratory findings in a large sample size with a homogeneous data collection protocol across all participants.

Lesion voxels to lesion networks: The enduring value of the Vietnam Head Injury Study.

The Vietnam Head Injury Study has been curated by Dr Jordan Grafman since the 1980s in an effort to study patients with penetrating traumatic brain injuries suffered during the Vietnam War. Unlike many datasets of ischemic stroke lesions, the VHIS collected extraordinarily deep phenotyping and was able to sample lesion locations that are not constrained to typical vascular territories. For decades, this dataset has helped researchers draw causal links between neuroanatomical regions and neuropsychiatric symptoms. The value of the VHIS has only increased over time as techniques for analyzing the dataset have developed and evolved. Tools such as voxel lesion symptom mapping allowed one to relate symptoms to individual brain voxels. With the advent of the human connectome, tools such as lesion network mapping allow one to relate symptoms to connected brain networks by combining lesion datasets with new atlases of human brain connectivity. In a series of recent studies, lesion network mapping has been combined with the Vietnam Head Injury dataset to identify brain networks associated with spirituality, religiosity, consciousness, memory, emotion regulation, addiction, depression, and even transdiagnostic mental illness. These findings are enhancing our ability to make diagnoses, identify potential treatment targets for focal brain stimulation, and understand the human brain generally. Our techniques for studying brain lesions will continue to improve, as will our tools for modulating brain circuits. As these advances occur, the value of well characterized lesion datasets such as the Vietnam Head Injury Study will continue to grow. This study aims to review the history of the Vietnam Head Injury Study and contextualize its role in modern-day localization of neurological symptoms.

Converging Evidence for Frontopolar Cortex as a Target for Neuromodulation in Addiction Treatment.

Noninvasive brain stimulation technologies such as transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) are emerging neuromodulation therapies that are being used to target the neural substrates of substance use disorders. By the end of 2022, 205 trials of tES or TMS in the treatment of substance use disorders had been published, with heterogeneous results, and there is still no consensus on the optimal target brain region. Recent work may help clarify where and how to apply stimulation, owing to expanding databases of neuroimaging studies, new systematic reviews, and improved methods for causal brain mapping. Whereas most previous clinical trials targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, accumulating data highlight the frontopolar cortex as a promising therapeutic target for transcranial brain stimulation in substance use disorders. This approach is supported by converging multimodal evidence, including lesion-based maps, functional MRI-based maps, tES studies, TMS studies, and dose-response relationships. This review highlights the importance of targeting the frontopolar area and tailoring the treatment according to interindividual variations in brain state and trait and electric field distribution patterns. This converging evidence supports the potential for treatment optimization through context, target, dose, and timing dimensions to improve clinical outcomes of transcranial brain stimulation in people with substance use disorders in future clinical trials.

Targeting Symptom-Specific Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Increasing evidence suggests that the clinical effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation are target dependent. Within any given symptom, precise targeting of specific brain circuits may improve clinical outcomes. This principle can also be extended across symptoms-stimulation of different circuits may lead to different symptom-level outcomes. This may include targeting different symptoms within the same disorder (such as dysphoria vs. anxiety in patients with major depression) or targeting the same symptom across different disorders (such as primary major depression and depression secondary to stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease). Some of these symptom-specific changes may be desirable, while others may be undesirable. This review focuses on the conceptual framework through which symptom-specific target circuits may be identified, tested, and implemented.

The future of brain circuit-targeted therapeutics.

The principle of targeting brain circuits has drawn increasing attention with the growth of brain stimulation treatments such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and focused ultrasound (FUS). Each of these techniques can effectively treat different neuropsychiatric disorders, but treating any given disorder depends on choosing the right treatment target. Here, we propose a three-phase framework for identifying and modulating these targets. There are multiple approaches to identifying a target, including correlative neuroimaging, retrospective optimization based on existing stimulation sites, and lesion localization. These techniques can then be optimized using personalized neuroimaging, physiological monitoring, and engagement of a specific brain state using pharmacological or psychological interventions. Finally, a specific stimulation modality or combination of modalities can be chosen after considering the advantages and tradeoffs of each. While there is preliminary literature to support different components of this framework, there are still many unanswered questions. This presents an opportunity for the future growth of research and clinical care in brain circuit therapeutics.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Optimal Stimulation Sites.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment option for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Several stimulation targets have been used, mostly in and around the anterior limb of the internal capsule and ventral striatum. However, the precise target within this region remains a matter of debate. METHODS: Here, we retrospectively studied a multicenter cohort of 82 patients with OCD who underwent DBS of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum and mapped optimal stimulation sites in this region. RESULTS: DBS sweet-spot mapping performed on a discovery set of 58 patients revealed 2 optimal stimulation sites associated with improvements on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, one in the anterior limb of the internal capsule that overlapped with a previously identified OCD-DBS response tract and one in the region of the inferior thalamic peduncle and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Critically, the nucleus accumbens proper and anterior commissure were associated with beneficial but suboptimal clinical improvements. Moreover, overlap with the resulting sweet- and sour-spots significantly estimated variance in outcomes in an independent cohort of 22 patients from 2 additional DBS centers. Finally, beyond obsessive-compulsive symptoms, stimulation of the anterior site was associated with optimal outcomes for both depression and anxiety, while the posterior site was only associated with improvements in depression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest how to refine targeting of DBS in OCD and may be helpful in guiding DBS programming in existing patients.

Multiple sclerosis lesions that impair memory map to a connected memory circuit.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 1 million Americans are living with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 30-50% will experience memory dysfunction. It remains unclear whether this memory dysfunction is due to overall white matter lesion burden or damage to specific neuroanatomical structures. Here we test if MS memory dysfunction is associated with white matter lesions to a specific brain circuit. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of standard structural images and verbal memory scores as assessed by immediate recall trials from 431 patients with MS (mean age 49.2 years, 71.9% female) enrolled at a large, academic referral center. White matter lesion locations from each patient were mapped using a validated algorithm. First, we tested for associations between memory dysfunction and total MS lesion volume. Second, we tested for associations between memory dysfunction and lesion intersection with an a priori memory circuit derived from stroke lesions. Third, we performed mediation analyses to determine which variable was most associated with memory dysfunction. Finally, we performed a data-driven analysis to derive de-novo brain circuits for MS memory dysfunction using both functional (n = 1000) and structural (n = 178) connectomes. RESULTS: Both total lesion volume (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) and lesion damage to our a priori memory circuit (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) were associated with memory dysfunction. However, lesion damage to the memory circuit fully mediated the association of lesion volume with memory performance. Our data-driven analysis identified multiple connections associated with memory dysfunction, including peaks in the hippocampus (T = 6.05, family-wise error p = 0.000008), parahippocampus, fornix and cingulate. Finally, the overall topography of our data-driven MS memory circuit matched our a priori stroke-derived memory circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion locations associated with memory dysfunction in MS map onto a specific brain circuit centered on the hippocampus. Lesion damage to this circuit fully mediated associations between lesion volume and memory. A circuit-based approach to mapping MS symptoms based on lesions visible on standard structural imaging may prove useful for localization and prognosis of higher order deficits in MS.

Mapping Lesion-Related Epilepsy to a Human Brain Network.

Importance: It remains unclear why lesions in some locations cause epilepsy while others do not. Identifying the brain regions or networks associated with epilepsy by mapping these lesions could inform prognosis and guide interventions. Objective: To assess whether lesion locations associated with epilepsy map to specific brain regions and networks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study used lesion location and lesion network mapping to identify the brain regions and networks associated with epilepsy in a discovery data set of patients with poststroke epilepsy and control patients with stroke. Patients with stroke lesions and epilepsy (n = 76) or no epilepsy (n = 625) were included. Generalizability to other lesion types was assessed using 4 independent cohorts as validation data sets. The total numbers of patients across all datasets (both discovery and validation datasets) were 347 with epilepsy and 1126 without. Therapeutic relevance was assessed using deep brain stimulation sites that improve seizure control. Data were analyzed from September 2018 through December 2022. All shared patient data were analyzed and included; no patients were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Epilepsy or no epilepsy. Results: Lesion locations from 76 patients with poststroke epilepsy (39 [51%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [14.6] years; mean [SD] follow-up, 6.7 [2.0] years) and 625 control patients with stroke (366 [59%] male; mean [SD] age, 62.0 [14.1] years; follow-up range, 3-12 months) were included in the discovery data set. Lesions associated with epilepsy occurred in multiple heterogenous locations spanning different lobes and vascular territories. However, these same lesion locations were part of a specific brain network defined by functional connectivity to the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Findings were validated in 4 independent cohorts including 772 patients with brain lesions (271 [35%] with epilepsy; 515 [67%] male; median [IQR] age, 60 [50-70] years; follow-up range, 3-35 years). Lesion connectivity to this brain network was associated with increased risk of epilepsy after stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% CI, 2.02-4.10; P < .001) and across different lesion types (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.23-3.69; P < .001). Deep brain stimulation site connectivity to this same network was associated with improved seizure control (r, 0.63; P < .001) in 30 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (21 [70%] male; median [IQR] age, 39 [32-46] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 24 [16-30] months). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study indicate that lesion-related epilepsy mapped to a human brain network, which could help identify patients at risk of epilepsy after a brain lesion and guide brain stimulation therapies.

Precision functional MRI mapping reveals distinct connectivity patterns for depression associated with traumatic brain injury.

Depression associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is believed to be clinically distinct from primary major depressive disorder (MDD) and may be less responsive to conventional treatments. Brain connectivity differences between the dorsal attention network (DAN), default mode network (DMN), and subgenual cingulate have been implicated in TBI and MDD. To characterize these distinctions, we applied precision functional mapping of brain network connectivity to resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from five published patient cohorts, four discovery cohorts (n = 93), and one replication cohort (n = 180). We identified a distinct brain connectivity profile in TBI-associated depression that was independent of TBI, MDD, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression severity, and cohort. TBI-associated depression was independently associated with decreased DAN-subgenual cingulate connectivity, increased DAN-DMN connectivity, and the combined effect of both. This effect was stronger when using precision functional mapping relative to group-level network maps. Our results support the possibility of a physiologically distinct "TBI affective syndrome," which may benefit from individualized neuromodulation approaches to target its distinct neural circuitry.