The type specimens of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) deposited in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Contribution VI. Family Andrenidae, genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775, taxa described by V. Popov.

The type specimens for names of bee taxa in the genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775, described by V.B. Popov and which are deposited in the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg) are reviewed. Primary types of 19 taxa are illustrated and detailed information is provided. New synonymies are established for Andrena chengtehensis Yasumatsu, 1935 (= A. nova Popov, 1940, syn. nov.) and A. skorikovi Popov, 1940 (=A. firuzaensis Popov, 1940, syn. nov.; =A. firuzaensis popovella Gusenleitner & Schwarz, 2002, syn. nov.; = Andrena iranella Popov, 1940, syn. nov.). Based on study of the the lectotype, we consider Andrena discophora transhissarica Popov, 1958, stat. rev., at the subspecific level, and not as a distinct species, as opposed to Shebl & Tadauchi (2011). Lectotypes are here designated for the following twelve nominal taxa: Andrena alashanica Popov, 1949, A. discophora transhissarica Popov, 1958, A. eoa Popov, 1949, A. fedtschenkoi djumensis Popov, 1947, A. firuzaensis Popov, 1940, A. iranella Popov, 1940, A. lebedevi Popov, 1940, A. nanshanica Popov, 1940, A. nova Popov, 1940, A. shakuensis Popov, 1949, A. subconsobrina Popov, 1949, and A. tadzhica Popov, 1949.

The bees of the genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775 (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae) described by Ferdinand Morawitz from the collection of Aleksey Fedtschenko.

The type specimens of the genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775, described by Ferdinand Morawitz from the collection of Aleksey Fedtschenko deposited in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg (Russia), are critically reviewed. Precise information with illustrations of types for 52 taxa is provided; of these 39 species are valid and thirteen are invalid (ten synonyms and three homonyms). Lectotypes are here designated for the following 24 nominal taxa: Andrenaacutilabris Morawitz, 1876, A.aulica Morawitz, 1876, A.bicarinata Morawitz, 1876, A.combusta Morawitz, 1876, A.comparata Morawitz, 1876, A.corallina Morawitz, 1876, A.discophora Morawitz, 1876, A.fedtschenkoi Morawitz, 1876, A.initialis Morawitz, 1876, A.laeviventris Morawitz, 1876, A.leucorhina Morawitz, 1876, A.mucorea Morawitz, 1876, A.nitidicollis Morawitz, 1876, A.oralis Morawitz, 1876, A.planirostris Morawitz, 1876, A.ravicollis Morawitz, 1876, A.rufilabris Morawitz, 1876, A.sarta Morawitz, 1876, A.smaragdina Morawitz, 1876, A.sogdiana Morawitz, 1876, A.subaenescens Morawitz, 1876, A.tuberculiventris Morawitz, 1876, A.turkestanica Morawitz, 1876, and A.virescens Morawitz, 1876.

The type specimens of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) deposited in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Contribution V. Family Andrenidae, genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775, species described by E. Eversmann.

The type specimens for names of bee taxa in the genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775 described by E. Eversmann and which are deposited in the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg) are reviewed. Primary types of 18 taxa are illustrated and detailed information is provided. New synonymy is established for three species: Andrena fallax Eversmann, 1852 (=A. ispida Warncke, 1965, syn. nov.); A. assimilis Radoszkowski, 1876 (=A. gravida Eversmann, 1852, nec A. gravida Imhoff, 1832, syn. nov.); A. nigriceps (Kirby, 1802) (=A. nigrifrons Eversmann, 1852, syn. nov.). Based on the lectotype studying we consider Andrena fulva Eversmann, 1852 (nec A. fulva Müller, 1766) to be a junior synonym of A. (Taeniandrena) eversmanniana Osytshnjuk, 1994, stat. rev., not A. (Margandrena) marginata Fabricius, 1776, as opposed to Gusenleitner & Schwarz (2002). Corrections on lectotype data are provided for four taxa: Andrena ambigua Eversmann, 1852, A. consobrina Eversmann, 1852, A. fulvitarsis Eversmann, 1852, and A. scita Eversmann, 1852.

The type specimens of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) deposited in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Contribution IV. Family Andrenidae, genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775, species described by F. Morawitz.

The type specimens for names of bee taxa in the genus Andrena Fabricius, 1775 of family Andrenidae described by F. Morawitz and deposited in the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg) are reviewed. Name-bearing types of 68 species are illustrated and detailed information is provided. Lectotypes are designated here for the following 32 nominal taxa: Andrena adjacens Morawitz, 1875, A. anthracina Morawitz, 1880, A. atrohirta Morawitz, 1893, A. croceiventris Morawitz, 1871, A. ehnbergi Morawitz, 1888, A. formosa Morawitz, 1877, A. glasunowi Morawitz, 1894, A. inconspicua Morawitz, 1871, A. laticeps Morawitz, 1877, A. melanura Morawitz, 1877, A. mongolica Morawitz, 1880, A. mucronata Morawitz, 1871, A. nigrobarbata Morawitz, 1871, A. nylanderi Morawitz, 1865, A. ochracea Morawitz, 1872, A. opaca Morawitz, 1868, A. orbitalis Morawitz, 1871, A. paliuri Morawitz, 1877, A. pretiosa Morawitz, 1893, A. ranunculorum Morawitz, 1877, A. rotundilabris Morawitz, 1877, A. sahlbergi Morawitz, 1888, A. salicina Morawitz, 1877, A. schencki Morawitz, 1866, A. semirubra Morawitz, 1875, A. sexguttata Morawitz, 1877, A. sylvatica Morawitz, 1877, A. transitoria Morawitz, 1871, A. truncatilabris Morawitz, 1877, A. tscheki Morawitz, 1872, A. virago Morawitz, 1894, A. curiosa Morawitz, 1877.

A reassessment of the phylogenetic utility of genus-level morphological characters in the family Bogidiellidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda), with description of a new species of Eobogidiella Karaman, 1981.

Bogidiellidae is the most diverse and cosmopolitan family of stygobiotic amphipods, and inhabits a variety of subterranean biotopes, especially interstitial habitats. While the family is characterized by considerable sexual dimorphism, this dimorphism has adversely affected our understanding of the systematics of the group. Most species have restricted geographic ranges and occur in difficult to sample habitats, so it is common for individual species descriptions to be based on a single sex. In this work we revisit an analysis of morphological characters in an attempt to clarify their phylogenetic utility in resolving taxonomic relationships among genera by introducing a new species, two additional characters, and phylogenetic statistical support values. Eobogidiella venkataramani sp. n., from a spring fed brook in the Shirawati River basin along the escarpment of the Western Ghats (Karnataka, India) differs from the only known congener, Eobogidiella purmamarcensis, from Argentina, in the structure of mouthparts, the shape and ornamentation on gnathopods and characters of the telson. Our phylogenetic analyses indicate that the available morphological characters are not sufficient to resolve phylogenetic relationships within Bogidiellidae, thus these characters alone cannot be used to determine the phylogenetic placement of Eobogidiella venkataramani sp. n. within the family. Nevertheless, Eobogidiella venkataramani sp. n. shares diagnostic characters with Eobogidiella, supporting placement of the new species in this genus. Our findings point towards a critical need to resolve relationships within the family using molecular approaches, along with the development of a suite of additional morphological characters for Bogidiellidae. This is the third species of Bogidiellidae from southern India.

Preliminary Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationships of the Asian-Pacific Endemial Subterranean Amphipod Genus Pseudocrangonyx Among Families and Genera of Crangonyctoidean Amphipods Inferred by Partial LSU rDNA Gene Sequences.

To analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Pseudocrangonyx within the superfamily Crangonyctoidea, we sequenced a partial LSU rDNA gene from four species (six specimens). The monophyly of Pseudocrangonyx and its affinity to Crymostygius were strongly supported by four reconstruction methods: neighbor-joining, minimum evolution, maximum-likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Current geographical distributions of the taxa studied and their phylogenetic relationships established in our study suggest that members of Pseudocrangonyctidae and Crymostygius diverged from a common Crangonyx-like ancestor in the Arctic Basin region of the northern hemisphere.

Studies on subterranean amphipod crustaceans of Primory, Russia. Part 1. Three new species of the genus Pseudocrangonyx from springs and other groundwater habitats in far eastern Russia.

Three new species of the subterranean amphipod of the genus Pseudocrangonyx: P. tiunovi sp. nov., P. holsingeri sp. nov., P. sympatricus sp. nov. and male specimen for P. kseniae Sidorov, 2012 from the South Primory, Far East of Russia are described. The species were found in springs and related groundwater habitats of several river systems belonging to the Japan Sea basin. Phylogenetic analysis based on mt-cox1 sequences supported the species distinctness. A key for the South Primory species of Pseudocrangonyx is provided.

Molecular taxonomy and phylogenetic affinities of two groundwater amphipods, Crangonyx islandicus and Crymostygius thingvallensis, endemic to Iceland.

The amphipod superfamily Crangonyctoidea is distributed exclusively in freshwater habitats worldwide and is characteristic of subterranean habitats. Two members of the family, Crangonyx islandicus and Crymostygius thingvallensis, are endemic to Iceland and were recently discovered in groundwater underneath lava fields. Crangonyx islandicus belongs to a well-known genus with representatives both in North America and in Eurasia. Crymostygius thingvallensis defines a new family, Crymostygidae. Considering the incongruences observed recently between molecular and morphological taxonomy within subterranean species, we aim to assess the taxonomical status of the two species using molecular data. Additionally, the study contributes to the phylogenetic relationships among several crangonyctoidean species and specifically among species from four genera of the family Crangonyctidae. Given the available data we consider how the two Icelandic species could have colonized Iceland, by comparing geographical origin of the species with the phylogeny. Regions of two nuclear (18S and 28S rRNA) and two mitochondrial genes (16S rRNA and COI) for 20 different species of three families of the Crangonyctoidea were sequenced. Four different methods were used to align the RNA gene sequences and phylogenetic trees were constructed using bayesian and maximum likelihood analysis. The Crangonyctidae monophyly is supported. Crangonyx islandicus appeared more closely related to species from the Nearctic region. Crymostygius thingvallensis is clearly divergent from the other species of Crangonyctoidea. Crangonyx and Synurella genera are clearly polyphyletic and showed a geographical association, being split into a Nearctic and a Palearctic group. This research confirms that the studied species of Crangonyctidae share a common ancestor, which was probably widespread in the Northern hemisphere well before the break up of Laurasia. The Icelandic species are of particular interest since Iceland emerged after the separation of Eurasia and North America, is geographically isolated and has repeatedly been covered by glaciers during the Ice Age. The close relation between Crangonyx islandicus and North American species supports the hypothesis of the Trans-Atlantic land bridge between Greenland and Iceland which might have persisted until 6 million years ago. The status of the family Crymostygidae is supported, whereas Crangonyx islandicus might represent a new genus. As commonly observed in subterranean animals, molecular and morphological taxonomy led to different conclusions, probably due to convergent evolution of morphological traits. Our molecular analysis suggests that the family Crangonyctidae needs taxonomic revisions.