Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Pediatrics ; 122(3): e615-20, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18725388

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to calculate sensitivity values for the detection of major respiratory viruses of childhood by using combined nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates. METHODS: Children who had symptoms and presented to a pediatric teaching hospital and had a diagnostic respiratory specimen collected were enrolled, and paired nose-throat swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected. Parents were asked to collect the nose-throat swab specimen in the first instance but could defer to a health care worker if unwilling. Nose-throat swab collectors were asked to rate perceived quality of collection. All nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected by a health care worker by using a standard protocol. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for 8 respiratory viruses was performed in our hospital's diagnostic laboratory. RESULTS: Paired nose-throat swab/nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected during 303 illnesses, with at least 1 respiratory virus identified in 186 (61%). For the major pathogens of childhood, influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus, collection by using the nose-throat swab had a sensitivity of 91.9% and 93.1%, respectively. A health care worker collected 219 (72%) of the nose-throat swab specimens; concordance with the nasopharyngeal aspirate was not related to health care worker collection or perceived quality of collection. CONCLUSIONS: Nose-throat swab specimens, in combination with sensitive molecular testing, are a less invasive diagnostic respiratory specimen with adequate sensitivity for use in the clinic and hospital outpatient settings and large-scale community studies through parent collection. For children who present to a hospital in which an avian or pandemic strain of influenza virus is reasonably part of the differential diagnosis, nasopharyngeal aspirates or a similar collection technique (eg, nasal washes) should continue to be used.


Assuntos
DNA Viral/análise , Vírus da Influenza A/genética , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Nasofaringe/virologia , Nariz/virologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/diagnóstico , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios/genética , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Queensland/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 49(1): 25-9, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15135496

RESUMO

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is now recognized as a sensitive and specific method for detecting Plasmodium species in blood. In this study, we tested 279 blood samples, from patients with suspected malaria, by a PCR assay utilizing species-specific colorimetric detection, and compared the results to light microscopy. Overall, both assays were in agreement for 270 of the 279 specimens. P. vivax was detected in 131 (47.0%) specimens, P. falciparum in 64 (22.9%) specimens, P. ovale in 6 (2.1%) specimens, and P. malariae in 5 (1.8%) specimens. Both P. falciparum and P. vivax were detected in a further 10 (3.6%) specimens, and 54 (19.3%) specimens were negative by both assays. In the remaining nine specimens, microscopy either failed to detect the parasite or incorrectly identified the species present. In summary, the sensitivity, specificity and simplicity of the PCR assay makes it particularly suitable for use in a diagnostic laboratory.


Assuntos
Malária/sangue , Plasmodium/classificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Animais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Sequência de Bases , Colorimetria , Sondas de DNA , Doenças Endêmicas , Feminino , Humanos , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/epidemiologia , Masculino , Microscopia , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Plasmodium/isolamento & purificação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Amostragem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
4.
J Mol Diagn ; 6(2): 125-31, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15096568

RESUMO

Cell culture and direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assays have been traditionally used for the laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viral infections. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (m-RT-PCR) is a sensitive, specific, and rapid method for detecting several DNA and RNA viruses in a single specimen. We developed a m-RT-PCR assay that utilizes multiple virus-specific primer pairs in a single reaction mix combined with an enzyme-linked amplicon hybridization assay (ELAHA) using virus-specific probes targeting unique gene sequences for each virus. Using this m-RT-PCR-ELAHA, we examined the presence of seven respiratory viruses in 598 nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) samples from patients with suspected respiratory infection. The specificity of each assay was 100%. The sensitivity of the DFA was 79.7% and the combined DFA/culture amplified-DFA (CA-DFA) was 88.6% when compared to the m-RT-PCR-ELAHA. Of the 598 NPA specimens screened by m-RT-PCR-ELAHA, 3% were positive for adenovirus (ADV), 2% for influenza A (Flu A) virus, 0.3% for influenza B (Flu B) virus, 1% for parainfluenza type 1 virus (PIV1), 1% for parainfluenza type 2 virus (PIV2), 5.5% for parainfluenza type 3 virus (PIV3), and 21% for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The enhanced sensitivity, specificity, rapid result turnaround time and reduced expense of the m-RT-PCR-ELAHA compared to DFA and CA-DFA, suggests that this assay would be a significant improvement over traditional assays for the detection of respiratory viruses in a clinical laboratory.


Assuntos
Nasofaringe/virologia , Vírus de RNA/isolamento & purificação , RNA Viral/análise , Infecções Respiratórias/economia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Vírus de RNA/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(1): 100-5, 2003 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12517833

RESUMO

The recent description of the respiratory pathogen human metapneumovirus (hMPV) has highlighted a deficiency in current diagnostic techniques for viral agents associated with acute lower respiratory tract infections. We describe two novel approaches to the detection of viral RNA by use of reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). The PCR products were identified after capture onto a solid-phase medium by hybridization with a sequence-specific, biotinylated oligonucleotide probe. The assay was applied to the screening of 329 nasopharyngeal aspirates sampled from patients suffering from respiratory tract disease. These samples were negative for other common microbial causes of respiratory tract disease. We were able to detect hMPV sequences in 32 (9.7%) samples collected from Australian patients during 2001. To further reduce result turnaround times we designed a fluorogenic TaqMan oligoprobe and combined it with the existing primers for use on the LightCycler platform. The real-time RT-PCR proved to be highly reproducible and detected hMPV in an additional 6 out of 62 samples (9.6%) tested during the comparison of the two diagnostic approaches. We found the real-time RT-PCR to be the test of choice for future investigation of samples for hMPV due to its speed, reproducibility, specificity, and sensitivity.


Assuntos
Metapneumovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae/virologia , Primers do DNA , Humanos , Metapneumovirus/genética , Sondas de Oligonucleotídeos , RNA Viral/análise , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sequência de RNA
7.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 42(2): 85-9, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11858902

RESUMO

The detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is now recognized as a sensitive and specific method of diagnosing infection by the organism. In this Study 152 urine specimens were examined for N. gonorrhoeae by a real-time PCR method using the LightCycler platform and results were compared to an "in-house" PCR assay using an ELISA-based detection method. N. gonorrhoeae DNA was detected in 29 (19%) specimens by LightCycler PCR (LC-PCR) and in 31 (20%) specimens by the "in house" PCR method. The LightCycler assay proved to be specific and 94% sensitive when compared to the "in house" PCR method. These features combined with the rapid turn-around time for results makes the LC-PCR particularly suitable for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in a routine clinical laboratory.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/urina , Corantes Fluorescentes , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Transferência de Energia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Gonorreia/microbiologia , Humanos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...