Fallopian tube reanastomosis by laparotomy versus laparoscopy: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of sterilization reversals by laparotomy versus laparoscopy. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches were carried out for randomized controlled trials and retrospective and prospective clinical studies. Search engines such as PubMed, Science Direct, Medline and the Cochrane database were made use of. Our restrictions were English human studies published from 1989 to January 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Microsurgical tubal reanastomosis performed comparing laparoscopy with laparotomy using a microsurgical technique. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: overall pregnancy rates, including positive clinical pregnancy, intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates. Secondary: surgery time. RESULTS: Three retrospective comparative studies were retrieved from international data that investigated laparotomy versus laparoscopy. A total number of 184 patients were included, 88 and 96 respectively undergoing laparoscopy and laparotomy. Pregnancy rates achieved by laparoscopy ranged from 65 to 80.5% (mean 74.43%) and by laparotomy from 70 to 80% (mean 71.33%). A subanalysis of two of the three comparative studies show that laparoscopy reversal surgery requires a statistically significant longer operative time than does laparotomy (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between the laparoscopy and laparotomy approach to tubal reanastomosis when regarding overall pregnancy rates, intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates.

Postmenopausal bleeding: a diagnostic approach for both private and public sectors.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the optimal diagnostic approach to women with postmenopausal bleeding by comparing transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial sampling with office hysteroscopy. METHODS: A prospective collective study was performed on 102 consecutive patients with postmenopausal bleeding who were evaluated by ultrasound measurement of the endometrial thickness (EL), endometrial sampling by Accurette and outpatient hysteroscopy and directed biopsy. RESULTS: Accurette was inadequate for histological diagnosis in 65 of 136 samples and many repeat investigations were required. In all 16 cases of endometrial polyps, ultrasound measurement of the EL was > or =4 mm and hysteroscopy confirmed the findings. Accurette detected only 5 polyps. All 7 cases of endometrial hyperplasia were detected using an EL of > or =4 mm and hysteroscopy confirmed the findings. Accurette failed to detect 5 out of 7 cases of endometrial hyperplasia. Five cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed: all had an EL > or =4 mm but were inadequately sampled for diagnostic purposes in 3 cases. A definitive diagnosis was made on hysteroscopy in 4 cases (1 patient did not have a hysteroscopy). CONCLUSION: Accurette is not a good sampling device for the diagnosis of postmenopausal bleeding. An ultrasound measurement of the EL > or =4 mm in patients with postmenopausal bleeding warrants further investigation. Outpatient office hysteroscopy is an accurate and sensitive modality to employ as a first line investigation for definitive diagnosis.

Knowledge and use of emergency contraception in a tertiary referral unit in a developing country.

BACKGROUND: The promotion and availability of emergency contraception have the possibility of reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies, leading to fewer pregnancy terminations and possibly to reduced maternal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The aims of the study were to determine the knowledge and use of emergency contraception in two groups of women: those requesting emergency contraception after sexual misadventure and another group of women requesting termination of pregnancy. A retrospective analysis was performed on all files of patients who requested emergency contraception over a 12-month period. Telephone interviews were conducted 1 year later. Structured questionnaires regarding knowledge and usage of emergency contraception were also administered to patients requesting termination of pregnancy. RESULTS: Seventy-six women requested emergency contraception over the 12-month period. Forty-one (53.9%) did not attend the follow-up visit. Only two patients used condoms. A total of 39 patients were contacted by telephone after 1 year. Of these, 18 did not use any contraception, although five were sexually active. In the group of women who requested termination of pregnancy, 44% had not previously used contraception. In all, 40% did not know about emergency contraception, 36% had not used it previously and 24% had used it previously. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of knowledge concerning emergency contraception can contribute to the number of legal abortions requested. There is an urgent need to address current education for users and providers on the use of emergency contraception.