Weight-adjusted tinzaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in bariatric surgery patients weighing 160 kg or more.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery patients experience an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), however, the optimal dose of low-molecular-weight heparin for VTE prophylaxis remains uncertain. Currently, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton utilizes a weight-adjusted tinzaparin dosage (50 to 75 units/kg rounded to nearest pre-filled syringe) for postoperative VTE prophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the safety of weight-adjusted tinzaparin for VTE prophylaxis in bariatric surgery patients weighing ≥160 kg. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving patients weighing ≥160 kg that underwent bariatric surgery from September 2015 to September 2019. Patients received a single dose of weight-adjusted subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) [5000 or 7500 IU] immediately prior to surgery, subcutaneous UFH [5000 IU, 7500 IU, or unspecified] immediately postoperatively, and either 10,000 or 14,000 IU of tinzaparin, beginning on the day after surgery, for 10 days. Intra-operative sequential compression devices could be used at the attending surgeon's discretion. Occurrence of VTE and major bleeding within 30 days of surgery were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included for analysis, all patients received in-hospital follow-up while 349 patients had also 30-day follow-up. For the primary safety and efficacy analysis of in-hospital events, VTE and major bleeding rates were 0.26% [95% CI 0.01%-1.44%] (1/389) and 0.77% [95% CI 0.21%-2.24%] (3/389) respectively. For patients with 30-day follow-up VTE and major bleeding rates were 0.57% [95% CI 0.1%-2.07%] (2/349) and 1.43% [95% CI 0.61%-3.3%] (5/349) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted tinzaparin was associated with a low risk of bleeding and VTE events, supporting its use for VTE prophylaxis for patients weighing ≥160 kg.

Resumption of anticoagulant therapy after anticoagulant-related gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is permanently discontinued in up to 50% of patients following a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. A previous meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of thromboembolism and death, and a non-statistically significant increased risk of re-bleeding associated with resumption. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to determine the risks of recurrent GI bleeding, thromboembolism, and death in patients who resumed OAC compared to those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for new references from January 2014 to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving adults with OAC-related GI bleeding were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROBINS-I tool. Pooled relative risk (RR) ratios were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 12 observational studies involving 3098 patients. There was an increased risk of recurrent GI bleeding (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.47-2.48, I2 = 0%, 11 studies), and a reduced risk of thromboembolism (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68, I2 = 59.8%, 9 studies) and death (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.70, I2 = 71.8%, 8 studies) in patients who resumed OAC compared to those who did not. Eleven studies were judged to be at serious risk of bias due to confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Resuming OAC after OAC-related GI bleeding appears to be associated with an increase in recurrent GI bleeding, but a reduction in thromboembolism and death. Further prospective data are needed to identify patients for whom the net clinical benefit favours OAC resumption and the optimal timing of resumption.

Weight-adjusted tinzaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after bariatric surgery.

Essentials The optimal dose and duration of thromboprophylaxis after bariatric surgery are unclear. We evaluated the safety of weight-adjusted tinzaparin prophylaxis in 1212 patients. In-hospital rates of venous thromboembolism and major bleeding were 0.2% and 1.8% respectively. In a sub-set of patients, trough anti-Xa levels did not show excessive anticoagulant activity. SUMMARY: Background Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The optimal dose and duration of anticoagulant prophylaxis is uncertain. Objective To evaluate the safety of extended-duration weight-adjusted tinzaparin after bariatric surgery. Patients/methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery who received weight-adjusted tinzaparin 4500-14 000 IU daily (75 IU kg-1 rounded to the nearest prefilled syringe) for 10 days after surgery (7-9 days post-hospital discharge). Primary safety outcomes were the frequency of VTE and major bleeding within 30 days of surgery in patients receiving at least one dose of tinzaparin. Results A total of 1279 patients undergoing bariatric surgery between July 2009 and December 2012 were reviewed, of whom 1212 received weight-adjusted tinzaparin. Safety outcomes were collected for 819 patients at 30 days, and for 1212 patients in-hospital only. The median age was 45.0 years, median weight was 130.0 kg and 98.8% of patients underwent gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. In patients completing 30 days of follow-up, VTE occurred in 4/819 (0.5%) and major bleeding occurred in 13/819 patients (1.6%). In-hospital rates of VTE and major bleeding during surgical admission were 3/1212 (0.2%) and 22/1212 (1.8%), respectively. Conclusions Extended thromboprophylaxis with weight-adjusted tinzaparin appears to be a safe strategy after bariatric surgery, with low rates of postoperative VTE and major bleeding.

Anticoagulants in cancer.

Cancer patients are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), which results in substantial morbidity and mortality. In this narrative review, we present evidence for the use of anticoagulants in the treatment and prevention of VTE in cancer patients. The benefit of perioperative anticoagulant prophylaxis following cancer surgery is well established. However, the risk-benefit trade-offs in non-surgical hospitalized cancer patients and among outpatients receiving chemotherapy are more complex. Emerging evidence suggests that the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may confer a small survival benefit in cancer patients without VTE. However, specific patient populations that may derive the most benefit have yet to be defined. Guidelines endorse LMWH as the preferred treatment for acute VTE, on the basis of high-quality clinical trial data, but the optimal duration of treatment remains unclear, and practical issues may limit its use outside the clinical trial setting. Novel oral anticoagulants may provide additional treatment and prophylaxis options, but their efficacy and safety in this population have not been established. Despite the significant impact of VTE on the lives of cancer patients and the large body of existing literature regarding treatment and prevention, important unanswered clinical questions remain, emphasizing the need for additional high-quality clinical trial data.