La estimulación cerebral profunda en el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo refractario al tratamiento: una revisión sistemática / Deep brain stimulation and treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review

Introducción: Al menos el 10% de pacientes con trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo (TOC) son refractarios al tratamiento psicofarmacológico. La aparición de nuevas tecnologías neuroquirúrgicas (estimulación cerebral profunda[ECP]) de modulación de la actividad neuronal alterada está posibilitando su extensión a casos graves y refractarios de TOC en los que anteriormente se utilizaban técnicas quirúrgicas no reversibles. El objetivo de este artículo es revisar la evidencia científica existente sobre la eficacia y aplicabilidad de esta técnica en este grupo de pacientes. Método: Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática de la literatura en las bases de datos PubMed/Medline, Embase y PsycINFO usando las palabras clave relacionadas con «deep brain stimulation», «DBS» y «obsessive-compulsive disorder», «OCD». Dos de los autores seleccionaron los artículos, de manera independiente, a partir de sus abstracts y en función de si describían alguno de los aspectos principales de la técnica en el TOC: aplicabilidad; mecanismo de acción; dianas terapéuticas cerebrales; efectividad; efectos secundarios, y coterapias. Toda la información fue sistemáticamente extraída y evaluada. Resultados: El análisis crítico de la evidencia señala que la aplicación de la ECP en el tratamiento del TOC refractario está aportando resultados satisfactorios, con rangos asumibles de efectos secundarios. Sin embargo, todavía no hay evidencia suficiente que permita priorizar el uso de una determinada diana cerebral. La selección de pacientes ha de seguir un análisis de riesgo/beneficio, debiéndose individualizar la decisión de mantener un tratamiento concomitante farmacológico/psicoterapéutico. Conclusiones: La ECP se encuentra todavía en el ámbito de la investigación, pero su aplicación en el TOC-refractario es cada vez más frecuente, produciendo en la mayoría de los estudios una significativa mejoría de los síntomas, y también del funcionamiento y calidad de vida. Es preciso realizar más estudios controlados y aleatorizados sobre su efectividad a largo plazo, y sobre su relación riesgo/beneficio y costes

Introduction: At least 10% of patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) are refractory to psychopharmacological treatment. The emergence of new technologies for the modulation of altered neuronal activity in Neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled its use in severe and refractory OCD cases. The objective of this article is to review the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness and applicability of this technique to refractory OCD. Method: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the main characteristics of deep brain stimulation, its use and applicability as treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therefore, we reviewed PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases, combining the key-words 'Deep brain stimulation', 'DBS' and 'Obsessive-compulsive disorder' 'OCS'. The articles were selected by two of the authors independently, based on the abstracts, and if they described any of the main characteristics of the therapy referring to OCD: applicability; mechanism of action; brain therapeutic targets; efficacy; side-effects; co-therapies. All the information was subsequently extracted and analysed. Results: The critical analysis of the evidence shows that the use of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD is providing satisfactory results regarding efficacy, with assumable side-effects. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any single brain target over another. Patient selection has to be done following analyses of risks/benefits, being advisable to individualize the decision of continuing with concomitant psychopharmacological and psychological treatments. Conclusions: The use of DBS is still considered to be in the field of research, although it is increasingly used in refractory-OCD, producing in the majority of studies significant improvements in symptomatology, and in functionality and quality of life. It is essential to implement random and controlled studies regarding its long-term efficacy, cost-risk analyses and cost/benefit

Deep brain stimulation and treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review. / La estimulación cerebral profunda en el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo refractario al tratamiento: una revisión sistemática.

INTRODUCTION: At least 10% of patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) are refractory to psychopharmacological treatment. The emergence of new technologies for the modulation of altered neuronal activity in Neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled its use in severe and refractory OCD cases. The objective of this article is to review the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness and applicability of this technique to refractory OCD. METHOD: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the main characteristics of deep brain stimulation, its use and applicability as treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therefore, we reviewed PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases, combining the key-words 'Deep brain stimulation', 'DBS' and 'Obsessive-compulsive disorder' 'OCS'. The articles were selected by two of the authors independently, based on the abstracts, and if they described any of the main characteristics of the therapy referring to OCD: applicability; mechanism of action; brain therapeutic targets; efficacy; side-effects; co-therapies. All the information was subsequently extracted and analysed. RESULTS: The critical analysis of the evidence shows that the use of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD is providing satisfactory results regarding efficacy, with assumable side-effects. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any single brain target over another. Patient selection has to be done following analyses of risks/benefits, being advisable to individualize the decision of continuing with concomitant psychopharmacological and psychological treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DBS is still considered to be in the field of research, although it is increasingly used in refractory-OCD, producing in the majority of studies significant improvements in symptomatology, and in functionality and quality of life. It is essential to implement random and controlled studies regarding its long-term efficacy, cost-risk analyses and cost/benefit.

Multimodal MRI assessment of nigro-striatal pathway in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson disease.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) are two neurodegenerative alpha-synucleinopathies characterized by severe impairment of the nigro-striatal pathway. Based on T1-, T2*-, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), macro-structural and micro-structural abnormalities in these diseases can be detected. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the nigro-striatal changes that occur in patients with PD with those in patients with both variants of MSA (the parkinsonian variant, MSA-P, and the cerebellar variant, MSA-C), and to explore correlations between different MRI parameters and clinical data. METHODS: We simultaneously measured volume, T2* relaxation rates, and mean diffusivity in nigro-striatal structures (substantia nigra, caudate nucleus, and putamen) of 26 patients with PD and 29 patients with MSA (16 with MSA-P and 13 with MSA-C). RESULTS: Significant changes in the putamina in patients with MSA were observed compared with patients with PD. Patients with MSA-P had higher mean diffusivity values in their putamina than did patients with PD or MSA-C. The putamina of both subgroups of MSA had higher T2* relaxation rates values than PD. Remarkably, discriminant analysis showed that using two measurements of microstructural damage (T2* relaxation rates and mean diffusivity in the putamen) allowed 96% accuracy to distinguish patients with PD from those with MSA-P. Correlation analyses between MRI findings and clinical variables revealed that patients with PD showed significant correlations only at the nigra. In patients with MSA, clinical variables correlated with MRI findings in both the nigra and striatum. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal MRI reveals different pattern of nigro-striatal involvement in patients with PD and patients with MSA.

Distinctive features of NREM parasomnia behaviors in parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize parasomnia behaviors on arousal from NREM sleep in Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). METHODS: From 30 patients with PD, Dementia with Lewy Bodies/Dementia associated with PD, or MSA undergoing nocturnal video-polysomnography for presumed dream enactment behavior, we were able to select 2 PD and 2 MSA patients featuring NREM Parasomnia Behviors (NPBs). We identified episodes during which the subjects seemed to enact dreams or presumed dream-like mentation (NPB arousals) versus episodes with physiological movements (no-NPB arousals). A time-frequency analysis (Morlet Wavelet Transform) of the scalp EEG signals around each NPB and no- NPB arousal onset was performed, and the amplitudes of the spectral frequencies were compared between NPB and no-NPB arousals. RESULTS: 19 NPBs were identified, 12 of which consisting of 'elementary' NPBs while 7 resembling confusional arousals. With quantitative EEG analysis, we found an amplitude reduction in the 5-6 Hz band 40 seconds before NPBs arousal as compared to no-NPB arousals at F4 and C4 derivations (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many PD and MSA patients feature various NREM sleep-related behaviors, with clinical and electrophysiological differences and similarities with arousal parasomnias in the general population. SIGNIFICANCE: This study help bring to attention an overlooked phenomenon in neurodegenerative diseases.