Metoprolol Reduces Hemodynamic and Metabolic Overload in Asymptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no pharmacological treatment can modify the natural history of aortic valve stenosis (AS). This underlines the critical need to explore novel treatment strategies, which could postpone or prevent the need for aortic valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic AS. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether metoprolol reduce the hemodynamic and metabolic burden imposed by AS. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a double-blinded design, 40 patients with moderate-severe asymptomatic AS (aortic valve area, 0.5±0.1 cm2/m2; peak gradient, 53±19 mm Hg) were randomized to placebo or metoprolol treatment for 22 weeks. Patients were evaluated by echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and 11C-acetate positron emission tomography. Compared with placebo, metoprolol (100±53 mg/d) decreased heart rate; mean difference (95% confidence interval) -8 minute-1 (-13, -3; P=0.003) and increased ejection time 26 ms (2, 50; P=0.03). Furthermore, metoprolol reduced aortic valve peak -7 mm Hg (-13, 0; P=0.05) and mean -4 mm Hg (-7, -1; P=0.03) gradients, without affecting stroke volume 3 mL/m2 (-2, 8; P=0.16). Valvuloarterial impedance (ie, global afterload) and myocardial oxygen consumption were reduced by -11% and -12% (P=0.03 and 0.01), respectively; and decreased heart rate correlated with lower valvuloarterial impedance, myocardial oxygen consumption, and improved myocardial efficiency defined as stroke work/myocardial oxygen consumption (r=0.63-0.65; all P<0.01). There were 2 adverse cardiovascular events in the metoprolol group and none in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic AS, metoprolol increases systolic ejection time and reduces aortic valve gradients, global afterload, and myocardial oxygen requirements. Thus, metoprolol displays favorable hemodynamic and metabolic effects and could improve outcome in patients with asymptomatic AS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02076711.

Myocardial Oxygen Consumption and Efficiency in Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients With and Without Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and its coupling to contractile work are fundamentals of cardiac function and may be involved causally in the transition from compensated left ventricular hypertrophy to failure. Nevertheless, these processes have not been studied previously in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants underwent 11C-acetate positron emission tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and echocardiography to measure MVO2 and myocardial external efficiency (MEE) defined as the ratio of left ventricular stroke work and the energy equivalent of MVO2. We studied 10 healthy controls (group A), 37 asymptomatic AS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% (group B), 12 symptomatic AS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% (group C), and 9 symptomatic AS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (group D). MVO2 did not differ among groups A, B, C, and D (0.105±0.02, 0.117±0.024, 0.129±0.032, and 0.104±0.026 mL/min per gram, respectively; P=0.07), whereas MEE was reduced in group D (21.0±1.6%, 22.3±3.3%, 22.1±4.2%, and 17.3±4.7%, respectively; P<0.05). Similarly, patients with global longitudinal strain greater than -12% and paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS had impaired MEE (P<0.05 versus controls). The ability to discriminate between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was superior for global longitudinal strain compared with MVO2 and MEE (area under the curve 0.98, 0.48, and 0.61, respectively; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AS patients display a persistent ability to maintain normal MVO2 and MEE (ie, the ability to convert energy into stroke work); however, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%; global longitudinal strain greater than -12%; or paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS demonstrate reduced MEE. These findings suggest that mitochondrial uncoupling contributes to the dismal prognosis in patients with reduced contractile function or paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS.

Small artery structure during antihypertensive therapy is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Structural changes of small resistance arteries occur early in the disease process of essential hypertension and predict cardiovascular events in previously untreated patients. We investigated whether on-treatment small artery structure also identifies patients at elevated risk despite normalization of blood pressure (BP). METHODS: We conducted a long-term follow-up survey of cardiovascular events in 134 moderate-risk patients with 9-12 months of well treated essential hypertension. All participants underwent subcutaneous biopsies with determination of small artery structure in terms of media to lumen ratio (M : L) before and during treatment. RESULTS: After 9-12 months of treatment SBP was lowered from 164 ± 15 to 134 ± 14 mmHg (P < 0.01) and M : L reduced from 0.084 ± 0.028 to 0.075 ± 0.024 (P < 0.01). Mean follow-up hereafter was 15 years representing a total of 2035 years for the entire cohort. During this period 47 patients suffered a predefined cardiovascular event. For patients with on-treatment M : L above the mean value of the cohort (≥0.075), the hazard ratio was 2.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-3.84, P = 0.01] and also those with M : L above mean +2SD of a normotensive population (≥0.098) had an elevated risk (hazard ratio 2.99, 95% CI 1.60-5.58, P < 0.01). Both results were adjusted for heart score (a 10-year mortality risk estimate integrating age, sex, smoking status, cholesterol level and SBP). Analysis of changes in M : L during treatment showed significantly higher event rates among patients with increased M : L and vice versa (hazard ratio 1.36 per 25% change, 95% CI 1.07-1.73, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: On-treatment small artery structure identifies individuals still at increased cardiovascular risk despite long-term BP normalization and may be an additional target for therapy to prevent cardiovascular events.

Small artery structure is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Structural abnormality of resistance arteries is a characteristic pathophysiological phenomenon in essential hypertension and can be assessed in vitro as an increase in the media: lumen ratio (M: L) of isolated small arteries. We have investigated whether M: L is a risk predictor in uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients. Recently, high M: L was demonstrated as a prognostic marker in patients at high cardiovascular risk, including normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. Since diabetes is associated with pressure-independent changes in M: L, the relevance of this finding to essential hypertension has been uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up survey of 159 essential hypertensive patients, who had previously been submitted to a M: L evaluation while participating in a clinical trial. They composed a homogeneous moderate-risk group, with no concomitant diseases, and represented 1661 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty patients suffered a documented predefined cardiovascular event during follow-up. Increased relative risk (RR) was associated with M: L >or= 0.083 (mean level of the hypertensive cohort), RR = 2.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-4.95], and with M: L >or= 0.098 (mean level of a normotensive control group + 2SD), RR = 2.49 (95% CI 1.21-5.11). Both results remained significant (RR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.04-4.64, and RR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.06-4.56, respectively) when adjusted for Heart Score level (10-year mortality risk-estimate, integrating age, gender, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol and smoking). CONCLUSION: Abnormal resistance artery structure independently predicts cardiovascular events in essential hypertensive patients at moderate risk.