The Efficacy of an Over-the-Counter Multivitamin and Mineral Supplement to Prevent Infections in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Remission With Immunomodulators and/or Biological Agents: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with immunomodulators or biologic therapy are at increased risk of infections. Malnutrition and vitamin or mineral deficiencies are common among patients with IBD. The results of various studies have indicate that vitamin deficiencies might increase the risk of infections. To evaluate the efficacy of a multivitamin and mineral supplement on the incidence of infections in patients with IBD treated with immunomodulators, biologic therapy, or combination therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to compare a multivitamin and mineral supplement (supplemented group) vs identical-in-appearance placebo (placebo group) in a total of 320 non-vitamin-deficient patients with IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) in remission with immunomodulators, biologic therapy, or combination therapy. Participants were asked to take a daily multivitamin and mineral supplement or placebo and report the occurrence of infections during a 24-week period of follow-up. RESULTS: Treatment arms consisted of 162 and 158 patients for the supplement and placebo, respectively. In both treatment groups, 107 patients reported an infection during the 24-week follow-up period (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.48). In the supplemented group, 32 patients received antibiotics for an infection compared with 21 patients in the placebo group (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.93). CONCLUSIONS: An over-the-counter multivitamin and mineral supplement did not reduce the risk of infection for patients with IBD in remission with immunomodulators, biologic therapy, or combination therapy.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of infections due to vitamin or mineral deficiencies. An over-the-counter supplement did not reduce the risk of infection for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission with immunomodulators and/or biologic therapy.

Biomarker-based prediction of inflammatory bowel disease-related colorectal cancer: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Regular colonoscopic surveillance for detection of dysplasia is recommended in longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), however, its sensitivity is disputed. Screening accuracy may increase by using a biomarker-based surveillance strategy. METHODS: A case-control study was performed to determine the prognostic value of DNA ploidy and p53 in IBD-related neoplasia. Cases with IBD-related colorectal cancer (CRC), detected in our surveillance program between 1985-2008, were selected and matched with two controls, for age, gender, disease characteristics, interval of follow-up, PSC, and previous surgery. Biopsies were assessed for DNA ploidy, p53, grade of inflammation and neoplasia. Progression to neoplasia was analyzed with Cox regression analysis, adjusting for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Adjusting for age, we found statistically significant Hazard ratios (HR) between development of CRC, and low grade dysplasia (HR5.5; 95%CI 2.6-11.5), abnormal DNA ploidy (DNA index (DI) 1.06-1.34, HR4.7; 95%CI 2.9-7.8 and DI>1.34, HR6.6; 95%CI 3.7-11.7) and p53 immunopositivity (HR3.0; 95%CI 1.9-4.7) over time. When adjusting for all confounders, abnormal DNA ploidy (DI 1.06-1.34, HR4.7; 95%CI 2.7-7.9 and DI>1.34, HR5.0; 95%CI 2.5-10.0) and p53 immunopositivity (HR1.7; 95%CI 1.0-3.1) remained statistically significant predictive of neoplasia. CONCLUSION: In longstanding IBD, abnormal DNA ploidy and p53 immunopositivity are important risk factors of developing CRC. The yield of surveillance may potentially increase by adding these biomarkers to the routine assessment of biopsies.

Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: As the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and mortality in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) are important determinants of the potential yield and cost-effectiveness of BE surveillance, clarification of these factors is essential. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of EAC and mortality due to EAC in BE under surveillance. METHODS: Databases were searched for relevant cohort studies in English language that reported EAC risk and mortality due to EAC in BE. Studies had to include patients with histologically proven BE, documented follow-up, and histologically proven EAC on surveillance. A random effects model was used with assessment of heterogeneity by the I(2)-statistic and of publication bias by Begg's and Egger's tests. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included in the main analysis. The overall mean age of BE patients was 61 years; the mean overall proportion of males was 64%. The pooled estimate for EAC incidence was 6.3/1000 person-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval, 4.7-8.4) with considerable heterogeneity (P < .001; I(2) = 79%). Nineteen studies reported data on mortality due to EAC. The pooled incidence of fatal EAC was 3.0/1000 person-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.9) with no evidence for heterogeneity (P = .4; I(2) = 7%). No evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BE are at low risk of malignant progression and predominantly die due to causes other than EAC. This undermines the cost-effectiveness of BE surveillance and supports the search for valid risk stratification tools to identify the minority of patients that are likely to benefit from surveillance.

Aneuploidy and overexpression of Ki67 and p53 as markers for neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) aims at early detection and treatment of neoplastic changes, particularly esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The histological evaluation of biopsy samples has its limitations, and biomarkers may improve early identification of BE patients at risk for progression to EAC. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of p53, Ki67, and aneuploidy as markers of neoplastic progression in BE. METHODS: A total of 27 BE patients with histologically proven progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC (cases) and 27 BE patients without progression (controls) were selected and matched for age, gender, and duration of follow-up. Dysplasia grade was determined in 212 biopsy samples obtained during surveillance endoscopies from cases and in 231 biopsy samples collected from controls. DNA ploidy status was determined by flow cytometry, whereas Ki67 and p53 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by Cox regression adjusted for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: A univariate analysis showed that low-grade dysplasia (LGD) increased the risk of developing HGD/EAC compared with no dysplasia (HR 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6 - 8.1). Aneuploidy (HR 3.5; 95% CI: 1.3-9.4), strong Ki67 overexpression (HR 5.2; 95% CI: 1.5-17.6), and moderate p53 overexpression (HR 6.5; 95% CI: 2.5-17.1) were also associated with an increased risk of developing HGD/EAC, independent of the histological result. A multivariable analysis showed that in the presence of LGD, p53 overexpression, and to a lesser extent, Ki67 overexpression remained important risk factors for neoplastic progression, whereas aneuploidy was no longer predictive. CONCLUSIONS: p53 overexpression and, to a lesser extent, Ki67 overexpression could predict neoplastic progression in BE irrespective of the histological result. These markers may be useful for identifying patients at an increased risk of developing EAC, either alone or used as a panel.