Long-Term Retention of Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Knowledge and Confidence in Doctor of Pharmacy Students.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of American Heart Association (AHA) advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) education and training on long-term retention of ACLS knowledge and confidence in Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students. METHODS: This multicenter study included PharmD students who received ACLS training through different means: 1-hour didactic lecture (didactic), 1-hour didactic lecture with 2-hour skills practice (didactic + skills), and comprehensive AHA ACLS certification through an elective course (elective-certification). Students completed a survey before training, immediately after training, and at least 6-12 months after training to assess demographics and ACLS confidence and knowledge. The primary outcome was a passing score, defined as ≥ 84% on the long-term knowledge assessment. Secondary outcomes included overall knowledge score and perceived confidence, assessed using the Dreyfus model. RESULTS: The long-term assessment was completed by 160 students in the didactic group, 66 in the didactic + skills group, and 62 in the elective-certification group. Six (4%), 8 (12%), and 14 (23%) received a passing score on the long-term knowledge assessment in the didactic, didactic + skills, and elective-certification groups, respectively. The median (IQR) scores on the long-term knowledge assessment were 50% (40-60), 60% (50-70), and 65% (40-80) in the 3 groups. On the long-term assessment, confidence was higher in the elective-certification group, demonstrated by more self-ratings of competent, proficient, and expert, and fewer self-ratings of novice and advanced beginner. CONCLUSION: Long-term retention of ACLS knowledge was low in all groups, but was higher in students who received AHA ACLS certification through an ACLS elective course.

Impact of Pharmacy Residency Research Training on Residents' Actual Versus Perceived Ability and Interest to Identify and Solve Practice-Related Problems.

PURPOSE: The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) requires that accredited residency programs provide pharmacy residents the opportunity to perform a practice-based project. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacy residency research training on residents' actual versus perceived ability to solve practice-related problems in their professional careers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy practice residents who completed training at a large academic medical center between 2007 and 2013. The survey consisted of 3 areas of assessment, that is, (1) general demographics, (2) perceived research abilities, and (3) self-reported research productivity. RESULTS: A total of 39 residents were eligible; of those, 27 completed the survey (69.2% response rate). Participants reported low perceived ability for conductance of some research activities including study design development, implementation, and publication. No association between perceived research ability and self-reported research productivity was found. Research experience prior to residency training strongly predicted for subsequent publication after completion of PGY1 residency training (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: New training mechanisms may be needed to optimize research training that will provide residents with greater emphasis on areas of perceived deficiency.