Concurrent Use of Abemaciclib and Radiotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: There is little evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the combination of abemaciclib plus radiotherapy (RT). The majority of studies investigated the combination of RT with palbociclib or ribociclib reporting that hematological toxicity is common. Given the unique toxicity profile of abemaciclib with greater gastrointestinal toxicity compared to hematological toxicity, we wanted to evaluate the toxicity of the combination with RT in metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced BC treated with RT and concurrent abemaciclib were selected. Toxicity was assessed according to the NCI-CTCAE V4.0. RESULTS: Thirty-two metastatic sites were treated in 19 patients and analyzed. All patients received abemaciclib during the RT course. A total of 68% of patients received a full dose of abemaciclib during RT. Also, 71.9% of patients received a palliative intent (median dose = 30 Gy, range = 8-30 Gy), and 26.3% were treated for 9 oligo-metastatic or oligo-progressive sites of disease with stereotactic body RT (median dose = 30 Gy, range 21-30 Gy, given in 3-5 fractions). Overall, the rate of G3 toxicity was 15.7%. The rate of G3 hematological toxicity was 10.6% (2/19 patients, one G3 neutropenia and one G3 anemia). No patient presented diarrhea, including those treated for RT sites close to the bowel. One patient developed G3 skin toxicity. Pain significantly improved after RT (mean value NRS pre-RT = 3.9, SD = 3.07; mean value NRS after RT = 0.9, SD = 0.46; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Abemaciclib and concomitant RT seem well tolerated showing acceptable toxicity.

Breast Volume Is a Predictor of Higher Heart Dose in Whole-Breast Supine Free-Breathing Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Planning.

In breast cancer volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning, the rotation of the gantry around the target implies a greater dose spreading to the whole heart, compared to tangential-field standard treatment. A consecutive cohort of 121 breast cancer patients treated with the VMAT technique was investigated. The correlation of breast volume, heart volume and lung volume with mean heart dose (mHD) and mean and maximum LAD dose (mLAD dose, MLAD dose) was tested, and a subsequent a linear regression analysis was carried out. VMAT treatment plans from 56 left breast cancer and 65 right breast cancer patients were analyzed. For right-sided patients, breast volume was significantly correlated with mHD, mLAD and MLAD dose, while for left-sided patients, breast volume was significantly correlated with mHD and mLAD, while heart volume and lung volume were correlated with mHD, mLAD and MLAD dose. Breast volume was the only predictor of increased heart and LAD dose (p ≤ 0.001) for right-sided patients. In left-sided patients, heart and lung were also predictors of increased mHD (p = 0.005, p ≤ 0.001) and mean LAD dose (p = 0.009, p ≤ 0.001). In this study, we observed an increase in heart and LAD doses in larger-breasted patients treated with VMAT planning. In right-sided patients, breast volume was shown to be the only predictor of increased heart dose and LAD dose.

BOMB trial: First results of stereotactic radiotherapy to primary breast tumor in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Aim: A prospective dose escalation trial was developed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABRT) to primary breast cancer in stage IV disease. The aim of the present report was to describe safety and outcome of the first dose level cohort of patients. Material and methods: Patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma (biological immuno-histochemical profile: luminal and/or HER2 positive) and distant metastatic disease not progressing after 6 months of systemic therapy with a tumor CT or 5FDG-PET detectable were deemed eligible. The starting dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions (level 1) because this dose proved to be safe in previous dose-escalation trial on adjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy. The maximum dose level was chosen as 45 Gy in 5 fractions. Dose limiting toxicity was any grade 3 or worse toxicity according to CTCAE v.4. Time-to-event Keyboard (TITE-Keyboard) design (Lin and Yuan, Biostatistics 2019) was used to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). MTD was the dose of radiotherapy associated with a ≤ 20% rate pre-specified treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: To date 10 patients have been treated at the starting dose level. Median age was 80 years (range 50-89). 7 patients had a luminal disease, while 3 patients had an HER2 positive disease. No patient suspended ongoing systemic treatment. No protocol defined DLTs were observed. Grade 2 skin toxicity occurred in 4 patients with diseases located close to or involving the skin. Median follow-up was 13 months and all 10 patients were evaluable for response: 5 achieved a complete response, 3 achieved a partial response and 2 showed a stable disease, all with a clinical benefit (resolution of skin retraction, bleeding and pain). The mean reduction in the sum of the largest diameters of target lesions was of 61.4% (DS=17.0%). Conclusions: SABR to primary breast cancer seems feasible and is associated with symptoms reduction. Continued accrual to this study is needed to confirm the safety and assess the MTD. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05229575.

The psychological impact of the covid-19 pandemic on radiotherapy cancer patients.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) characterized the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Were enrolled 210 patients in treatment and in follow-up who had access to the Radiation Oncology Department of the Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Foundation between April and May 2020. The sample was subjected to structured interview and validated questionnaires. 37% of patients showed significant levels of distress; depressive symptoms were reported by 22.4% of patients and 99% of sample had clinically significant anxiety symptoms. All patients anxiety worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=< 0.001). Patients on active treatment had higher levels of distress (3.5 vs 2.6; p = 0.04) and anxiety (3.5 vs 2.6; p = 0.04). Lung cancer patients appeared to be more afraid of COVID-19 than other patients (24.2 vs 22.2). This study highlights the presence of clinically significant anxiety in 99% of sample. This conclusion reflects the condition of emotional distress present during the pandemic which makes it necessary to treat patients in a multidisciplinary perspective that includes psychological support in the care plan.

Radiotherapy for HER 2 Positive Brain Metastases: Urgent Need for a Paradigm Shift.

Brain metastases (BMs) are common among patients affected by HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (>30%). The management of BMs is usually multimodal, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy and palliative care. Standard brain radiotherapy (RT) includes the use of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for limited disease and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for extensive disease. The latter is an effective palliative treatment but has a reduced effect on brain local control and BM overall survival, as it is also associated with severe neurocognitive sequelae. Recent advances both in radiation therapy and systemic treatment may change the paradigm in this subset of patients who can experience long survival notwithstanding BMs. In fact, in recent studies, SRT for multiple BM sites (>4) has shown similar efficacy when compared to irradiation of a limited number of lesions (one to three) without increasing toxicity. These findings, in addition to the introduction of new drugs with recognized intracranial activity, may further limit the use of WBRT in favor of SRT, which should be employed for treatment of both multiple-site BMs and for oligo-progressive brain disease. This review summarizes the supporting literature and highlights the need for optimizing combinations of the available treatments in this setting, with a particular focus on radiation therapy.

Stereotactic Radiation and Dual Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Blockade with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in the Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Single Institution Series.

(1) Background: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of fractionated SRT (fSRT) and pertuzumab-trastuzumab (PT) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). (2) Methods: Patients with HER2+ BCBM who received FSRT from 2015 to 2019 were identified. Patients were included if they were treated with fSRT within 21 days of receiving PT. All lesions were treated with LINAC-based fSRT to a total dose of 27 Gy delivered in three consecutive fractions. All patients received concurrent PT. Patients were evaluated 4-6 weeks after SRS and subsequently every 2-3 months with MRI re-imaging (3) Results: A total of 49 patients with HER2+ brain metastases were identified. Of these patients, a total of 10 patients with 32 HER2+ BCBM were treated with concurrent SRT and PT and included in the analysis. No local progression was observed. Overall response rate was 68.7%. Only one patient developed asymptomatic radionecrosis. Median time to BM occurrence was 15.6 (range: 1-40.5 months). Distant intracranial failure occurred in 4/10 patients (40.0%). Overall BCBM median survival was 33.9 months (95%CI 24.1-43.6). Mean duration of PT treatment was 27.9 months (range: 10.1-53.7 months). (4) Conclusions: In our single institution experience, fSRT and PT showed to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with an adequate overall response rate.

Lymph nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer: what are the unresolved issues?

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard in invasive breast cancer. Axillary dissection (ALND) is controversial in some presentations.Areas covered: Key questions were formulated and explored focused on four different scenarios in adjuvant axillary radiation management in early and locally advanced breast cancer. Answers to these questions were searched in MEDLINE, PubMed from June 1946 to August 2020. Clinical trials, retrospective studies, international guidelines, meta-analysis, and reviews were explored.Expert opinion: Analysis according to biological disease characteristics is necessary to establish the impact of ALND avoidance in unexpectedly positive SLNB (pN1) in cN0 patients. A low-risk probability of axillary recurrence was observed if axillary radiotherapy (ART) or ALND were offered without impact on outcomes. Adjuvant RNI in pT1-3 pN1 treated with mastectomy or BCS should be proposed in unfavorable disease and risk factors. In ycN0 after NACT, SLNB can be offered in selected cases or ALND should be performed. After SLNB post-NACT (ypN1), ALND and adjuvant radiotherapy are mandatory.

Repeated courses of radiation treatment in an HER2-positive breast cancer patient with diffuse brain metastases: A case report.

In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) expressing breast cancer subtype, the incidence of brain metastases is common and patients often die due to uncontrolled cranial disease. This is a case report of a HER2+ breast cancer woman with diffuse brain metastases that experienced long survival and clinical benefit from multiple radiotherapy treatments and combined systemic therapy, without increased toxicity.

Concurrent radiotherapy with palbociclib or ribociclib for metastatic breast cancer patients: Preliminary assessment of toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early toxicity of concurrent use of radiotherapy in association with CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib or ribociclib) in patients with hormone-receptors positive metastatic breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of patients with histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer treated in our institution were reviewed. Patients who received radiotherapy and concurrent palbociclib or ribociclib were selected. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE V4.0). RESULTS: Sixteen consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients with 24 radiotherapy treatments were studied. Thirteen patients (81.3%) received palbociclib, 3 (18.7%) patients received ribociclib concurrently with RT (18 and 5 radiotherapy courses respectively). The majority of patients (68.7%) received palliative radiotherapy to the bones (median dose 30 Gy, range 8-36 Gy). Five patients (31.2%) were treated in oligo-metastatic or oligo-progressive sites of disease with higher doses (median dose = 50 Gy, range 39.6-60 Gy). The most common toxicity observed was hematological toxicity. Neutropenia was common (grade 2 = 12.5%; grade 3 = 25%, grade 4 = 6.3%); 60% of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 neutropenia had already experienced neutropenia during previous cycles of palbociclib. One patient (6.3%) completed the RT course earlier (48 Gy of 50 Gy prescribed) and another patient (6.3%) suspended RT for 2 days. CONCLUSION: concomitant treatment of CDK4/6 and radiotherapy seems well tolerated; high grade hematological toxicity is common, but did not change treatment course in the majority of patients. Previous toxicity should be carefully evaluated as it usually reoccurs.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for breast cancer: a dose escalation study.

METHODS:: Patients with breast cancer with pathological stage pT 1-2 and at least one risk factor for local recurrence such as N1 disease, lymphovascular invasion, extensive intraductal component, close margins, non-hormone sensitive disease, grading G3 were enrolled. Patients were treated with hypofractionated RT to whole breast with a dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. The dose was escalated to the tumour bed through a daily concomitant boost technique at three dose levels: 48 Gy (3.2 Gy/die), 50.25 Gy(3.35 Gy/die) and 52.5 Gy (3.5 Gy/die). Dose escalation to a higher step was carried out if all patients of the lower dose had completed the treatment without dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Skin toxicity, cosmetic evaluation and quality of life was evaluated at baseline, at treatment end and at 3 and 12 months after RT end. RESULTS:: Three patients for each dose level were enrolled. No DLT occurred. The maximum toxicity collected during RT was G2 skin toxicity in 3 (33.3%) patients, one for each dose level. No G2 toxicity at 3 and 12 months was collected. At median follow up of 21.8 months (range: 13.5 - 40.9 months), no G2 late toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSION:: The 3 week course of post-operative RT with dose escalation to the tumour bed to 52.5 Gy has been achieved without dose limiting toxicities and can be tested in Phase II trials. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: In our study, we tested the highest dose level to the tumour bed ever reported in studies using accelerated hypofractionation with concomitant boost in high risk patients.

Implementation of a voluntary deep inspiration breath hold technique (vDIBH) using BrainLab ExacTrac infrared optical tracking system.

BACKGROUND: Voluntary deep inspiration breath hold technique (vDIBH) is considered as the key to achieving the widest cardiac sparing in whole breast irradiation. Several techniques have been implemented to achieve a reproducible, fast and friendly treatment. The aim of the present study is to implement vDIBH using the ExacTrac (BrainLAB AG, Germany) monitoring system. METHODS: Women with left-sided breast cancer, younger than 50 years or with cardiac disease, underwent whole breast RT with vDIBH using the ExacTrac (BrainLAB AG, Germany) monitoring system. Simulations were performed with patients positioned supine on a breast board with both arms raised above the head. Five optical markers were placed on the skin around the border of the left breast gland and their position was referenced with ink marking. Each patient received a training session to find the individual deep inspiration level. Finally, a vDIBH CT was taken. All patients were also studied in free breathing (FB) in order to compare the dose distribution for PTV, heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Pre-treatment verification was carried out through the ExacTrac (BrainLAB AG, Germany) system and verified with electronic portal imaging (EPI). Moreover, daily real time EPIs in during modality (captured during the beam delivery) were taken in order to check the reproducibility. RESULTS: 34 patients have been evaluated and 30 were eligible for vDIBH. Most patients showed small setup errors during the treatment course of below 5 mm in 94.9% of the recorded fields. Mean Displacement was less in cranio-caudal direction. Mean intra-fraction displacement was below 3 mm in all directions. vDIBH plans provided better cardiac dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: vDIBH technique using ExacTrac (BrainLAB AG, Germany) monitoring system was applied with good reproducibility.

Variability in axillary lymph node delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy in presence of guidelines on a multi-institutional platform.

AIM: To quantify the variability between radiation oncologists (ROs) when outlining axillary nodes in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each participating center, three ROs with different levels of expertise, i.e., junior (J), senior (S) and expert (E), contoured axillary nodal levels (L1, L2, L3 and L4) on the CT images of three different patients (P) of an increasing degree of anatomical complexity (from P1 to P2 to P3), according to contouring guidelines. Consensus contours were generated using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) method. RESULTS: Fifteen centers and 42 ROs participated. Overall, the median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.66. Statistically significant differences were observed according to the level of expertise (better agreement for J and E, worse for S); the axillary level (better agreement for L1 and L4, worse for L3); the patient (better agreement for P1, worse for P3). Statistically significant differences in contouring were found in 18% of the inter-center comparison. Less than a half of the centers could claim to have a good agreement between the internal ROs. CONCLUSIONS: The overall intra-institute and inter-institute agreement was moderate. Central lymph-node levels were the most critical and variability increased as the complexity of the patient's anatomy increased. These findings might have an effect on the interpretation of results from multicenter and even mono-institute studies.

Local Control and Toxicity of Adaptive Radiotherapy Using Weekly CT Imaging: Results from the LARTIA Trial in Stage III NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomical change of tumor during radiotherapy contributes to target missing. However, in the case of tumor shrinkage, adaptation of volume could result in an increased incidence of recurrence in the area of target reduction. This study aims to investigate the incidence of failure of the adaptive approach and, in particular, the risk for local recurrence in the area excluded after replanning. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with concomitant chemoradiation underwent weekly chest computed tomography simulation during treatment. In the case of tumor shrinkage, a new tumor volume was delineated and a new treatment plan outlined (replanning). Toxicity was evaluated with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale. Patterns of failures were classified as in field (dimensional and/or metabolic progression within the replanning planning target volume [PTV]), marginal (recurrence in initial the PTV excluded from the replanning PTV), and out of field (recurrence outside the initial PTV). RESULTS: Replanning was outlined in 50 patients selected from a total of 217 patients subjected to weekly simulation computed tomography in our center from 2012 to 2014. With a median follow-up of 20.5 months, acute grade 3 or higher pulmonary and esophageal toxicity were reported in 2% and 4% of cases and late toxicity in 4% and 2%, respectively. Marginal relapse was recorded in 6% of patients, and 20% and 4% of patients experienced in-field and out-of-field local failure, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced toxicity and the documented low rate of marginal failures make the adaptive approach a modern option for future randomized studies. The best scenario to confirm its application is probably in neoadjuvant chemoradiation trials.