Efficacy and feasibility of acupuncture for patients in the ED with acute, nonpenetrating musculoskeletal injury of the extremities.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy of acupuncture as an analgesic intervention for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) after minor acute trauma to the extremities. In addition, we sought to assess the feasibility of performing acupuncture in this setting. METHODS: Acupuncture was used as primary analgesia for a convenience sample of ED patients with acute, nonpenetrating extremity injury. Efficacy was measured using a visual analog scale before treatment, immediately after acupuncture (time 0), and every 30 minutes thereafter. A telephone call was made to patients within 72 hours to ascertain pain levels using a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale. Markers of feasibility included average time patients spent in the fast track area of the ED vs average time in the department (TID) for all fast track patients with similar injury. RESULTS: Of 47 patients approached, 20 (43%) consented to participate. The mean age of those who consented was 33 years, and 70% (n = 14) were male. Median change in visual analog scale score for pre-acupuncture vs time 0 was 16 mm, with range of 0 to 60 mm. Median numerical rating scale score at time of discharge and at follow-up was 3. Median TID was 135 minutes, with a range of 55 to 255 minutes. Patients with extremity injury who did not receive acupuncture had a median TID of 90 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that acupuncture can be an effective analgesic intervention for patients with acute injury to the extremities. Acupuncture did not increase patients' TID. Minor complications were reported.

Pain scores improve analgesic administration patterns for trauma patients in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of pain scores in improving pain management practices for trauma patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A prospective, observational study of analgesic administration to trauma patients was conducted over a nine-week period following educational intervention and introduction of verbal pain scores (VPSs). All ED nursing and physician staff in an urban Level I trauma center were trained to use the 0-10 VPS. Patients younger than 12 years old, having a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) <8, or requiring intubation were excluded from analysis. Demographics, mechanism of injury, vital signs, pain scores, and analgesic data were extracted from a computerized ED database and patients' records. The staff was blinded to the ongoing study. RESULTS: There were 150 patients studied (183 consecutive trauma patients seen; 33 patients excluded per criteria). Pain scores were documented for 73% of the patients. Overall, 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 45% to 61%) of the patients received analgesics in the ED. Of the patients who had pain scores documented, 60% (95% CI = 51% to 69%) received analgesics, whereas 33% (95% CI = 18% to 47%) of the patients without pain scores received analgesics. No patient with a VPS < 4 received analgesics, whereas 72% of patients with a VPS > 4 and 82% with a VPS > 7 received analgesics. Mean time to analgesic administration was 68 minutes (95% CI = 49 to 87). CONCLUSIONS: Pain assessment using VPS increased the likelihood of analgesic administration to trauma patients with higher pain scores in the ED.

Demand on ED resources during periods of widespread influenza activity.

The purpose of this study was to investigate ED resource demand during periods of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-declared widespread influenza activity (WIA). An observational analysis of secondary data describing ED resource demand was performed using computerized ED patient data over a 130-week period. Measures of ED resource utilization were compared during WIA and non-WIA periods. These measures included weekly census; percentage of patients triaged as having fever, infection, or respiratory (flu index) chief complaints; admission rate, ED LOS (length of stay), total bed time (TBT), the number of patients who left the ED without being seen by a physician (LWBS), and ED saturation time. The study included 34 weeks of CDC-designated WIA occurring over 3 distinct periods. During WIA, the flu index was elevated, 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-25) versus 17% (95% CI, 16-17). There was increased resource utilization during WIA periods compared with the non-WIA periods for the following parameters: admission rate (24% [95% CI, 24-25%] versus 23% [23-23%]), ED LOS admitted (296 [95% CI, 280-313] versus 271 [95% CI, 265-277]), ED LOS discharged (162 [95% CI, 156-168] versus 152 [95% CI, 150-154]), ED saturation time (1292 [95% CI, 689-1894] versus 409 [95% CI, 209-609]) and LWBS (31 [95% CI, 19-42] versus 14 [95% CI, 12-15]). Although each WIA period was marked by an initial spike in patient volume, weekly census did not increase (1365 [95% CI, 1297-1433] during WIA versus 1297 [95% CI, 1275-1320] during non-WIA). An association between WIA and greater ED resource demand was observed. A spike in census was observed at the onset of each WIA period. In addition, the flu index increased during WIA, suggesting the use of the ED as a site for syndromic surveillance of WIA onset.

Patterns of analgesic use in trauma patients in the ED.

The objective was to describe patterns of analgesic use for trauma patients treated in our emergency department (ED). We reviewed analgesic use in consecutive patients meeting American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Center Guidelines. A comprehensive database was abstracted from this institution's Trauma Registry and medical records of each patient. A total of 38% (95% CI: 31-46%) of patients received analgesics. Time to administration of first dose of analgesia was 109 minutes (95% CI: 85-133). Women, patients with long bone and pelvic fractures, and those with a longer ED stay were most likely to receive analgesics. Patients with head trauma and those admitted to the intensive care unit were least likely to receive analgesics. Morphine was the most frequent analgesic used with an average total dose of 14 milligrams. A majority of patients meeting ACS Trauma Center Guidelines did not receive analgesics in the ED.