[Use of summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) among family doctors and pharmacists in the context of the aut-idem regulation: Results of an exploratory cross-sectional survey]. / Nutzung von Fachinformationen bei Hausärzten und Apothekern im Zusammenhang der Aut-idem-Regelung: Ergebnisse einer explorativen Querschnittsbefragung.

INTRODUCTION: Summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) of same-substance medications may feature content-related differences. This may cause difficulties regarding informed consent in the case of prescriptions of drugs in the context of the aut-idem regulation. A survey among family doctors (FD) and pharmacists (PH) was conducted in order to evaluate the usage behaviour of SmPCs, sources used to obtain information about drugs and the awareness of the existence of differences between SmPCs of same-substance medications. METHODS: An exploratory/non-representative, questionnaire- and telephone-based, semi-structured cross-sectional survey was performed (June to August 2018). RESULTS: Participation rate of FD and PH was 29.8 % (34/114) and 73.0 % (73/100), respectively. In the previous month, all PH and 82.4 % of FD said that they had used a SmPC at least once (p=0.001). FD used SmPCs 6.4±4.9 and PH 65.0±52.5 times a month (p<0.001). In both occupational groups SmPCs were used most frequently to obtain information about dosing and/or type of application (FD: 97.1 %; PH: 98.6 %) and contraindications (97.1 % and 86.3 %, resp.). In both samples, the internet was the most frequently used drug information source (FD: 97.1 %; PH: 98.6 %), followed by the Rote/Gelbe Liste (97.1 % and 71.2 %, resp.) and the SmPCs of the original product (52.9 % and 65.8 %, resp.) or generic drug (52.9 % and 61.6 %, resp.). Only 32.4 % of the FD vs. 79.5 % of PH believed that differences might exist between SmPCs of same-substance medications (p<0.001). FD stated that they never (11.8 %) or rarely (85.3 %) use SmPCs for informed consent. It was indicated that the aut-idem substitution is excluded in 10.3 %±5.0 (FD) and 9.6 %±6,1 (PH) of issued or received prescriptions. DISCUSSION: The results of the present survey indicate a low utilization rate of SmPCs by FD and little awareness of the existing differences of SmPCs of same-substance medications in this occupational group. Both aspects may impede proper information of patients, particularly in cases of aut-idem prescriptions of substances for which many same-substance medications with different SmPCs are available. CONCLUSION: Physicians should use SmPCs regularly and keep themselves informed about differences between SmPCs of same-substance medications.

[Different number of contraindications between summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) of drugs with the same active ingredients - an analysis of data from SmPCs of neuropsychiatric drugs]. / Unterschiedliche Anzahl von Kontraindikationen zwischen Fachinformationen wirkstoffgleicher Arzneimittel ­ eine Analyse von Daten aus Fachinformationen von neuropsychiatrischen Arzneimitteln.

OBJECTIVE: In the case of prescriptions of pharmaceuticals in the context of the aut-idem-regulation the physician frequently does not know, which same-substance medication is dispensed in the pharmacy; the contemplable same-substance medications may differ in numerous features which raises questions regarding the obligation to give information and medical liability for medical malpractice. Currently, systematic evaluations regarding differences between summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) of same-substance medications are missing. To determine size and type of those differences SmPCs of most (neuro)psychiatric drugs that are approved in Germany were evaluated regarding the number of listed contraindications (CI). METHODS: Basis for the selection of substances was the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System (group ATC N Nervous System). Substances that are approved in Germany for the treatment of mental disorders according to ICD-10 F were included. Brand-name medications and SmPCs were searched by means of further in- and exclusion criteria via the online services of PharmNet.Bund, Gelbe Liste, Rote Liste®/Fachinfo-Service® and communication with the manufacturer. RESULTS: N = 941 SmPCs (=116 substances) were evaluated. Considering only the group of SmPCs with > 1 brand-name medication (n = 78; 67.2 %) differences in the number of CIs were found in more than the half of substances (N = 43; 55.1 %). Considering indication groups most groups of SmPCs of same-substance medications with differences in the numbers of CIs were found in - considering only substances with > 1 brand-name medication - hypnotics and sedatives (77.8 %), anxiolytics (75.0 %), drugs for treatment of substance use disorders (66.7 %), antidepressants (61,9 %), anticonvulsant drugs and mood stabilizers (53.8 %), followed by antipsychotics (41.2 %), antidementia-drugs (20.0 %), and psychostimulants (0 %). Largest ranges regarding the number of CIs were found in the SmPCs of morphine (14), amitriptyline (8), chlorprothixene (6), lorazepam (6) and citalopram (4). CONCLUSION(S): In numerous (neuro-)psychopharmacologic substances differences exists between the SmPCs of the associated same-substance medications regarding the number of CIs. Due to the outstanding evaluation of content aspects of these differences and legal evaluation the relevance of this result for clinical practice is not yet clear.