Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone.

This study investigated the influence of implant macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque (IT), primary stability (ISQ), surface topography damage, and the amount of titanium (Ti) released during insertion. Forty implants with different macrogeometries (Facility - Cylindrical with spiral-shaped threads; Alvim - Tapered with buttress-shaped threads) were inserted into artificial bone types I-II and III-IV. Surface morphology was evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and roughness parameters with Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSCM) before and after insertion (AI). Implant macrogeometry was characterized by LSCM. The chemical composition of bone beds was determined by SEM associated with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy. The amount of Ti released was analyzed with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence. Alvim had greater IT and ISQ than Facility. Bone types I-II require higher IT of implants. Alvim also had greater internal threads angle, higher initial roughness, and significant reduction of roughness AI, compared to Facility. The functional surface height reduced AI, especially in flank and valley of threads. Height of surface roughness of Alvim and Facility implants was similar AI. Implants surface morphology changes and metallic particles on bone beds were observed after implant insertion, mainly into bone types III-IV. Implants inserted into bone types I-II showed less surface damage. Alvim implants released more Ti (37.52 ± 25.03 ppm) than Facility (11.66 ± 28.55 ppm) on bone types III-IV. The implant macrogeometry and bone types affect IT, ISQ, surface damage, and Ti amount released during insertion. Alvim implants were more wear susceptible, releasing higher Ti concentration during insertion into bone types III-IV.

Does implant surface hydrophilicity influence the maintenance of surface integrity after insertion into low-density artificial bone?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of hydrophilicity on the surface integrity of implants after insertion in low-density artificial bone and to determine the distribution of titanium (Ti) particles along the bone bed. METHODS: Forty-eight dental implants with different designs (Titamax Ex, Facility, Alvim, and Drive) and surface treatments (Neoporos® and Aqua™) were inserted into artificial bone blocks with density compatible with bone type III-IV. Hydrophobic Neoporos® surfaces were obtained by sandblasting and acid etching while hydrophilic Aqua™ surfaces were obtained by sandblasting, acid etching, and storage in an isotonic 0.9% NaCl solution. The surface integrity was evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and the surface roughness parameters (Sa, Sp, Ssk, Sdr, Spk, Sk, and Svk) and surface area were measured with Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy before and after installation. Bone beds were inspected with Digital Microscopy and micro X-Ray Fluorescence (µ-XRF) to analyze the metallic element distribution along the bone bed. RESULTS: Acqua™ implants had higher initial Sa and a pronounced reduction of Sa and Sp during insertion, compared to NeoPoros® implants. After insertion, Sa and Sp of Acqua™ and NeoPoros® implants equalized, differing only between designs of Acqua™ implants. Surface damage was observed after insertion, mainly in the apical region. Facility implants that are made of TiG5 released fewer debris particles, while the highest Ti intensity was detected in the cervical region of the Titamax Ex Acqua™ and Drive Acqua™ implants. SIGNIFICANCE: Physicochemical modifications to achieve surface hydrophilicity created a rougher surface that was more susceptible to surface alterations, resulting in more Ti particle release into the bone bed during surgical insertion. The higher Ti intensities detected in the cervical region of bone beds may be related to peri-implantitis and marginal bone resorption.