Análise das perdas causadas ao setor alimentício por embalagens inadequadas / Analysis of losses caused to the food sector by inadequate packaging

A produção de alimentos em larga escala revolucionou a indústria alimentícia e a levou a uma nova era de produção e de adaptação de seus produtos através de embalagens, que permitiram a esses alimentos uma duração maior, para acompanhar essa demanda constante e para que diminuísse as perdas já numerosa. No entanto, nem sempre as embalagens utilizam as exigências da Anvisa. Sendo assim, o objetivo desse trabalho de pesquisa foi analisar se as embalagens da indústria alimentícia empregam padrão de qualidade, evitando assim desperdícios.

Biomechanical Behavior of Tooth-Implant Supported Prostheses With Different Implant Connections: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis.

PURPOSE: Biomechanical behavior of tooth-implant-supported prostheses (TISPs) with external and internal implants was compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two 3-D models of TISP were designed by varying the implant: external (Model EH) and internal hexagons (Model IH). After loading, von Mises stresses were obtained in implants, abutments, and screws. Principal maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) stresses were analyzed in periodontal ligament (PL), alveolar bone, and periimplant bone. RESULTS: Model IH showed lower stress peaks in axial loading in the implant and in the screw but higher in abutment. In oblique loading, Model IH had lower stresses in the implant, but higher in the abutment and in the screw. In the σmax analysis for axial and oblique loads, stress peaks in Model IH were lower in PL, alveolar bone, and periimplant bone. In the σmin analysis for axial load, stress peaks in Model IH were lower in PL, but higher in alveolar bone and in periimplant bone. In oblique load, Model IH showed lower stress peaks in PL and alveolar bone, but higher stress peaks in periimplant bone. CONCLUSIONS: TISPs with IH implants do present lower risk of biomechanical failure.

Effects of Screw- and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses on Bone: A Nonlinear 3-D Finite Element Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the stresses and displacements on perimplant bone generated by screw- and cement-retained prostheses using the finite element method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two models were constructed: partial fixed implant-supported prostheses with three elements retained by screws (SFP) or cement (CFP). Vertical and oblique loads of 100 N were applied on the models. Bone was analyzed by the principal stresses σ1 and σ3. The displacement between the implant and the bone was identified by the penetration and gap. RESULTS: Results showed a similar pattern in the distribution of the principal stresses between both prostheses. Under the σ1 stresses, the SFP showed similar values in the bone compared with the CFP. The analysis of the σ3 showed stress peaks 28% higher in the SFP, considering vertical and oblique loads. Displacement analysis showed a similar pattern and similar values between the prostheses for penetration and gap under both loads. CONCLUSIONS: There were no important differences in the σ1 analysis and the displacement between the SFP and CFP. The differences in marginal bone level reported between SFP and CFP in some clinical studies may not be related to a mechanical factor.

Comparison of different criteria for periodontitis case definition in head and neck cancer individuals.

PURPOSE: Different periodontitis case definitions have been used in clinical research and epidemiology. The aim of this study was to determine more accurate criterion for the definition of mild and moderate periodontitis case to be applied to head and neck cancer individuals before radiotherapy. METHODS: The frequency of periodontitis in a sample of 84 individuals was determined according to different diagnostic criteria: (1) Lopez et al. (2002);(2) Hujoel et al. (2006); (3) Beck et al. (1990); (4) Machtei et al. (1992); (5) Tonetti and Claffey (2005); (6) and Page and Eke (2007). All diagnosis were based on the clinical parameters obtained by a single calibrated examiner (Kw = 0.71). The individuals were evaluated before radiotherapy. They received oral hygiene instructions, and the cases diagnosed with periodontitis (Page and Eke 2007) were treated. The gold standard was the definition 6, and the others were compared by means of agreement, sensitivity (SS), specificity (SP), and the area under ROC curve. The kappa test evaluated the agreement between definitions. RESULTS: The frequency of periodontitis at baseline was 53.6 % (definition 1), 81.0 % (definition 2), 40.5 % (definition 3), 26.2 % (definition 4), 13.1 % (definition 5), and 70.2 % (definition 6). The kappa test showed a moderate agreement between definitions 6 and 2 (59.0 %) and definitions 6 and 1 (56.0 %). The criterion with higher SS (0.92) and SP (0.73) was definition 1. CONCLUSION: Definition 1 was the most accurate criterion to case periodontitis definition to be applied to head and neck cancer individuals.

Biomechanical evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The mechanical stability of the prosthetic components in the implant-prosthesis complex is essential to the long-term success of the restorations. However, little is known about the differences in the biomechanical behavior of screw- and cement-retained prostheses. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the preload maintenance, stresses, and displacements of prosthetic components of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported prostheses by using the finite element method in a nonlinear analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two 3-dimensional models were constructed: implant-supported fixed partial prostheses with 3 elements retained either by screws (SFP) or cement (CFP). After the simulation of screw tightening, the preload was calculated for both prostheses. Then vertical and oblique loads (100 N) were applied on the models. The preload was identified, the maximum von Mises equivalent stresses (SEQV) were obtained on the screws, and the displacement among the abutment, the implant, and screw was identified by observing the penetration and gap in the contact interfaces. RESULTS: Under vertical load, there was a higher decrease in the preload and in the SEQV on the screw in the SFP. Under oblique load, the SEQV was 24% higher on the screw of the SFP. In the displacement analysis under vertical load, penetration was concentrated in the threads of the screw in the SFP and between the abutment and implant in the CFP. The gap was 118% greater for the SFP and was concentrated on the abutment extension. Under oblique load, the displacement pattern was similar for both prostheses, but with values 66% higher for penetration and 96% higher for gap for the SFP. CONCLUSIONS: The SFP showed a higher biomechanical risk of failure than the CFP.

Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

PURPOSE: Using the three-dimensional finite element method (FEM), this study compared the biomechanical behavior of the "All-on-Four" system with that of a six-implant-supported maxillary prosthesis with tilted distal implants. The von Mises stresses induced on the implants under different loading simulations were localized and quantified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional models representing maxillae restored with an "All-on-Four" and with a six-implant-supported prosthesis were developed in three-dimensional design software and then transferred into FEM software. The models were subjected to four different loading simulations (full mouth biting, canine disclusion, load on a cantilever, load in the absence of a cantilever). The maximum von Mises stresses were localized and quantified for comparison. RESULTS: In both models, in all loading simulations, the peak stress points were always located on the neck of the distal tilted implant. The von Mises stress values were higher in the "All-on-Four" model (7% to 29%, higher, depending on the simulation). In the presence of a cantilever, the maximum von Mises stress values increased by about 100% in both models. CONCLUSIONS: The stress locations and distribution patterns were similar in the two models. The addition of implants resulted in a reduction of the maximum von Mises stress values. The cantilever greatly increased the stress.