Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Asthma ; : 1-11, 2024 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958952

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Asthma symptoms are dyspnea, chronic cough, wheezing, chest tightness, or chest discomfort, which can directly limit the activities of daily living (ADL), which is frequently reported by adults with asthma. Evaluating ADL with a reliable protocol with usual speed is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity, reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC), and standard error of measurement (SEM) of the Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) for adults with asthma. METHODS: Adults with asthma were evaluated with the LAP test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to verify validity with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Glittre-ADL test, and London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL). To test the reliability, the test was reapplied in at least 30 minutes; the Wilcoxon test and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), SEM, MDC, and learning effect were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-three individuals were included (26% men, 43 ± 15 years, BMI 28 ± 8kg/m2, FEV1 70 ± 24%predicted). For convergent validity, the LAP test was correlated with the 6MWT, Glittre-ADL, and LCADL scale (r=-0.49, 0.71, and 0.30, respectively; p < 0.03). There was a difference in test-retest (p < 0.0001) and reliability analysis shows ICC3 of 0.94, SEM of 14.88 seconds (22%), and MDC of 41.23 seconds (15%). Furthermore, the individuals performed the second test with -23 ± 19 (7.9%) seconds. CONCLUSION: The LAP test is valid and reliable for assessing limitations during ADL in adults with asthma. Considerable learning effect was observed, therefore, the best of two measures may avoid underestimation.

2.
J Asthma ; 61(1): 1-9, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37417908

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dyspnea during activities of daily living (ADL) is frequently reported by adults with asthma. However, instruments that specifically assess that in people with asthma have not yet been validated. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity and reliability, including standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Change (MDC), of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale for adults with asthma. METHODS: Adults with asthma answered the LCADL scale which was performed twice by the same rater. Spirometry, 6-min walk test (6MWT), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), and Glittre-ADL test were assessed. For statistical analyses, Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon test, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, SEM, MDC were performed. RESULTS: Seventy participants were included (30% men, 44 ± 15 years old, BMI 27[23-31]kg/m2, FEV1 80 ± 17%predicted). For convergent validity, the LCADL scale was moderately correlated with SGRQ, AQLQ, and Glittre-ADL (r = 0.57, -0.46, and 0.41 respectively; p < 0.0001). The LCADL scale correlated weakly with the mMRC scale, ACT, and spirometry measures (-0.23

Assuntos
Asma , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Asma/diagnóstico , Atividades Cotidianas , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Londres , Dispneia/diagnóstico , Dispneia/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...