Correlation of spatial patterns of endocardial pace mapping to underlying scar topography in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Endocardial pace mapping (PM) can identify conducting channels for ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Recent findings show the temporal and spatial pattern of PM may aid identification of the surface harboring VT isthmii. The specific correlation of PM patterns to scar topography has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the pattern of endocardial PMs to underlying scar topography in SHD patients with VT. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing VT ablation from August 2018 to February 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with SHD-related VT (mean age 65 ± 14 years) with 83 endocardial PM correlation maps were analysed. Two main correlation patterns were identified, an "abrupt-change correlation pattern (AC-pattern)" and "centrifugal-attenuation correlation pattern (CA-pattern)." AC-pattern had lower scar ratio (unipolar/bipolar % scar area; 1.1 vs. 1.5, p < .001), had longer maximal stimulus-QRS intervals (97.5 vs. 68 ms, p = .002), and higher likelihood of endocardial dominant scar (11/21 [52%] vs. 3/38 [8%], p < .001) than CA-pattern seen on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). In contrast, CA-pattern was more likely to have epicardial dominant scar or mid-intramural scar on ICE (epicardial dominant scar; CA-pattern: 12/38 [32%] vs. AC-pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .02, mid-intramural scar; CA-pattern: 15/38 [39%] vs. AC-pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The spatial pattern of endocardial PM in SHD-related VT directly correlates with scar topography. AC-pattern is associated with endocardial dominant scar on ICE with lower scar ratio and longer stimulus-QRS intervals, whereas CA-pattern is strongly associated with epicardial dominant or mid-intramural scar with higher scar ratio and shorter stimulus-QRS intervals.

Clinical, electroanatomic and electrophysiologic characterization and outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia following valvular intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) can occur following valvular interventions. There are limited data describing substrate and ablation approaches in such patients. We sought to describe the clinical, electrophysiologic, electroanatomic features and catheter ablation outcomes of patients with VT following aortic and/or mitral valve intervention. METHODS: Over 12-years, consecutive patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR) and/or mitral valve replacement (MVR) or repair, undergoing VT ablation, were identified from two centers. Clinical and procedural parameters and outcomes are described. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (age 66 ± 14years, 78% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 37 ± 16%), with prior AVR (mechanical n = 6, bioprosthetic n = 2, transcatheter n = 1), MVR (mechanical n = 5, bioprosthetic n = 1), mitral valve repair (n = 6) and both mechanical AVR and MVR (n = 2), underwent VT ablation. Sixteen had concurrent ischemic cardiomyopathy, 10 with prior bypass surgery. Left ventricular access was obtained in 21/23 (91%) patients (transseptal n = 14, retrograde aortic n = 5, transapical n = 2), with perivalvular scar identified in 17/21 (81%). Re-entrant VT isthmi involved the perivalvular regions in 12/23 (52%) patients, and regions remote from the valve in the remainder; 9% had nonscar-related VT. Intramural substrate was ablated from adjacent chambers in 5/23 (22%) patients and with half-normal saline irrigation in 8/23 (35%) patients. There were no instances of catheter entrapment. Following final ablation, VA-free survival was 78% at 13-months. CONCLUSION: Only half of VT circuits following valvular interventions involve the valve regions themselves, while the remainder involves unrelated regions. Catheter ablation is safe and efficacious at treating VT following valvular intervention, but novel strategies may be required.