Transition from static culture to stirred tank bioreactor for the allogeneic production of therapeutic discogenic cell spheres.

BACKGROUND: Culturing cells as cell spheres results in a tissue-like environment that drives unique cell phenotypes, making it useful for generating cell populations intended for therapeutic use. Unfortunately, common methods that utilize static suspension culture have limited scalability, making commercialization of such cell therapies challenging. Our team is developing an allogeneic cell therapy for the treatment of lumbar disc degeneration comprised of discogenic cells, which are progenitor cells expanded from human nucleus pulposus cells that are grown in a sphere configuration. METHODS: We evaluate sphere production in Erlenmeyer, horizontal axis wheel, stirred tank bioreactor, and rocking bag format. We then explore the use of ramped agitation profiles and computational fluid dynamics to overcome obstacles related to cell settling and the undesired impact of mechanical forces on cell characteristics. Finally, we grow discogenic cells in stirred tank reactors (STRs) and test outcomes in vitro (potency via aggrecan production and identity) and in vivo (rabbit model of disc degeneration). RESULTS: Computation fluid dynamics were used to model hydrodynamic conditions in STR systems and develop statistically significant correlations to cell attributes including potency (measured by aggrecan production), cell doublings, cell settling, and sphere size. Subsequent model-based optimization and testing resulted in growth of cells with comparable attributes to the original static process, as measured using both in vitro and in vivo models. Maximum shear rate (1/s) was maintained between scales to demonstrate feasibility in a 50 L STR (200-fold scale-up). CONCLUSIONS: Transition of discogenic cell production from static culture to a stirred-tank bioreactor enables cell sphere production in a scalable format. This work shows significant progress towards establishing a large-scale bioprocess methodology for this novel cell therapy that can be used for other, similar cell therapies.

Design of experiment (DOE) applied to artificial neural network architecture enables rapid bioprocess improvement.

Modern bioprocess development employs statistically optimized design of experiments (DOE) and regression modeling to find optimal bioprocess set points. Using modeling software, such as JMP Pro, it is possible to leverage artificial neural networks (ANNs) to improve model accuracy beyond the capabilities of regression models. Herein, we bridge the gap between a DOE skill set and a machine learning skill set by demonstrating a novel use of DOE to systematically create and evaluate ANN architecture using JMP Pro software. Additionally, we run a mammalian cell culture process at historical, one factor at a time, standard least squares regression, and ANN-derived set points. This case study demonstrates the significant differences between one factor at a time bioprocess development, DOE bioprocess development and the relative power of linear regression versus an ANN-DOE hybrid modeling approach.

Improving Cell Therapy Survival and Anabolism in Harsh Musculoskeletal Disease Environments.

Cell therapies are an up and coming technology in orthopedic medicine that has the potential to provide regenerative treatments for musculoskeletal disease. Despite numerous cell therapies showing preclinical success for common musculoskeletal indications of disc degeneration and osteoarthritis, there have been mixed results when testing these therapies in humans during clinical trials. A theory behind the mixed success of these cell therapies is that the harsh microenvironments of the disc and knee they are entering inhibit their anabolism and survival. Therefore, there is much ongoing research looking into how to improve the survival and anabolism of cell therapies within these musculoskeletal disease environments. This includes research into improving cell function under specific microenvironmental conditions known to exist in the intervertebral disc (IVD) and knee environment such as hypoxia, low-nutrient conditions, hyperosmolarity, acidity, and inflammation. This research also includes improving differentiation of cells into desired native cell phenotypes to better enhance their survival and anabolism in the knee and IVD. This review highlights the effects of specific musculoskeletal microenvironmental challenges on cell therapies and what research is being done to overcome these challenges. Impact statement While there has been significant clinical interest in using cell therapies for musculoskeletal pathologies in the knee and intervertebral disc, cell therapy clinical trials have had mixed outcomes. The information presented in this review includes the environmental challenges (i.e., acidic pH, inflammation, hyperosmolarity, hypoxia, and low nutrition) that cell therapies experience in these pathological musculoskeletal environments. This review summarizes studies that describe various approaches to improving the therapeutic capability of cell therapies in these harsh environments. The result is an overview of what approaches can be targeted and/or combined to develop a more consistent cell therapy for musculoskeletal pathologies.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of discogenic cells, an investigational cell therapy for disc degeneration.

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT: Disc degeneration (DD) is a significant driver of low back pain and few treatments exist to treat the pain and disability associated with the disease. PURPOSE: Our group has developed a method to generate therapeutic discogenic cells as a potential treatment for symptomatic DD. These cells are derived and modified from adult nucleus pulposus cells. In this study, we evaluated the characteristics, mode of action, and in vivo efficacy and safety of these cells prior to human clinical testing. STUDY DESIGN: Privately funded in vitro studies and in vivo preclinical models were used in this study. METHODS: Discogenic cells generated from different adult human donors were evaluated for surface marker expression profile, matrix deposition and tumorigenic potential. Discogenic cells were then injected subcutaneously into nude mice to assess cell survival and possible extracellular matrix production in vivo. Finally, a rabbit model of DD was used to evaluate the therapeutic potential of discogenic cells after disc injury. RESULTS: We found that discogenic cells have a consistent surface marker profile, are multipotent for mesenchymal lineages, and produce extracellular matrix consisting of aggrecan, collagen 1 and collagen 2. Cells did not show abnormal karyotype after culturing and did not form tumor-like aggregates in soft agar. After subcutaneous implantation in a nude mouse model, the human discogenic cells were found to have generated regions rich with extracellular matrix over the course of 4 months, with no signs of tumorigenicity. Intradiscal injection of human discogenic cells in a rabbit model of DD caused an increase in disc height and improvement of tissue architecture relative to control discs or injection of vehicle alone (no cells) with no signs of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that intradiscal injection of discogenic cells may be a viable treatment for human degenerative disc disease. The cells produce extracellular matrix that may rebuild the depleting tissue within degenerating discs. Also, the cells do not pose any significant safety concerns. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Human clinical testing of discogenic cells combined with a sodium hyaluronate carrier is ongoing in multiple randomized, controlled, double-blinded studies in the United States (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03347708) and Japan (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03955315).

Perspectives on the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Degeneration: The Value Proposition for a Cell-Based Therapy, Immunomodulatory Properties of Discogenic Cells and the Associated Clinical Evaluation Strategy.

Low back pain (LBP) is a serious medical condition that affects a large percentage of the population worldwide. One cause of LBP is disc degeneration (DD), which is characterized by progressive breakdown of the disc and an inflamed disc environment. Current treatment options for patients with symptomatic DD are limited and are often unsuccessful, so many patients turn to prescription opioids for pain management in a time when opioid usage, addiction, and drug-related deaths are at an all-time high. In this paper, we discuss the etiology of lumbar DD and currently available treatments, as well as the potential for cell therapy to offer a biologic, non-opioid alternative to patients suffering from the condition. Finally, we present an overview of an investigational cell therapy called IDCT (Injectable Discogenic Cell Therapy), which is currently under evaluation in multiple double-blind clinical trials overseen by major regulatory agencies. The active ingredient in IDCT is a novel allogeneic cell population known as Discogenic Cells. These cells, which are derived from intervertebral disc tissue, have been shown to possess both regenerative and immunomodulatory properties. Cell therapies have unique properties that may ultimately lead to decreased pain and improved function, as well as curb the numbers of patients pursuing opioids. Their efficacy is best assessed in rigorous double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical studies.

Discogenic cell transplantation directly from a cryopreserved state in an induced intervertebral disc degeneration canine model.

A multitude of studies has indicated the potential of cell therapy as a method for intervertebral disc (IVD) regeneration. Transplantation of a variety of cells has been assessed and shown capable of deterring the rate of degeneration in animal models and in human clinical trials. In this study, a novel approach using human discogenic nucleus pulposus cells directly from their cryopreserved state was assessed. In an established canine disc degeneration model, the degeneration process was evaluated in IVDs receiving precultured discogenic cells, thawed-only discogenic cells, and a saline sham injection after induction of degeneration. Degeneration progression was followed over time by the evaluation of the disc height index (DHI). Finally, after 12 weeks, the manipulated and control discs were explanted, histologically stained, and scored. Treated discs demonstrated retained DHI values for all treatment options. Histologic evaluations demonstrated significant improvement of matrix features compared to the sham. Moreover, thawed-only cells function at least as well as precultured discogenic cells. In short, cell transplantation of human discogenic cells directly from their cryopreserved state can arrest disc height degeneration and maintain histological matrix features in a canine disc degeneration model. The presented work demonstrates the potential of an off-the-shelf cell therapy product to treat degenerative disc disease.

Advancing cell therapies for intervertebral disc regeneration from the lab to the clinic: Recommendations of the ORS spine section.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is strongly associated with chronic low back pain, a leading cause of disability worldwide. Current back pain treatment approaches (both surgical and conservative) are limited to addressing symptoms, not necessarily the root cause. Not surprisingly therefore, long-term efficacy of most approaches is poor. Cell-based disc regeneration strategies have shown promise in preclinical studies, and represent a relatively low-risk, low-cost, and durable therapeutic approach suitable for a potentially large patient population, thus making them attractive from both clinical and commercial standpoints. Despite such promise, no such therapies have been broadly adopted clinically. In this perspective we highlight primary obstacles and provide recommendations to help accelerate successful clinical translation of cell-based disc regeneration therapies. The key areas addressed include: (a) Optimizing cell sources and delivery techniques; (b) Minimizing potential risks to patients; (c) Selecting physiologically and clinically relevant efficacy metrics; (d) Maximizing commercial potential; and (e) Recognizing the importance of multidisciplinary collaborations and engaging with clinicians from inception through to clinical trials.