The long head of biceps as a source of pain in active population: tenotomy or tenodesis? A comparison of 2 case series with isolated lesions.

The tendon of the long head of the biceps (LHB) is a common source of pain in the shoulder, and the surgical treatments proposed are tenotomy or tenodesis performed in different ways. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results (objective and subjective) of tenotomy versus soft tissue tenodesis. One-hundred and four patients with an isolated LHB pathology, arthroscopically treated between 2004 and 2007, were observed retrospectively. Forty-eight of these patients were treated with tenotomy and 56 with a soft tissue tenodesis technique. All the patients were evaluated by an independent observer with a minimum follow-up of 2 years which included VAS, DASH questionnaire, Constant score and ROM evaluation with a goniometer. All these evaluations were performed pre- and post-operatively. An independent expert radiologist then performed an ultrasound examination only in the post-operative evaluation of the tenodesis group looking to confirm the effectiveness of the procedure. In both groups, the scores were significantly improved. In the tenotomy group, 16.6 % of the patients had bicipital cramps for a mean post-operative time of 1 month. Constant score improved in both groups: 46.6 to 86.1 in tenotomy group and 48.9-84.9 in tenodesis group; VAS improved from 8.4 to 1.5 in tenotomy group and from 8.8 to 1.4 in tenodesis group; DASH scores changed from 42.5 to 13.6 in tenotomy group and from 55.8 to 11.4 in tenodesis group. Popeye sign was present in 37.5 % in the tenotomy group and in 5.3 % in tenodesis group. In 3 patients of the tenodesis group, ultrasound revealed complete failure of the tenodesis. In conclusion, both procedures are effective in terms of treatment of LHB pathologies. Tenotomy does not require specific post-operative treatment and is easy to perform, but cramp and Popeye sign may occur after surgery. The soft tissue tenodesis technique is an easy and cost-effective way to perform tenodesis with good results, especially in preventing the Popeye sign, but requires a longer rehabilitation time. Level of evidence IV.

Complete polyethylene wear-through and secondary breakage of the expansion cup in a ceramic-polyethylene total hip.

INTRODUCTION: Catastrophic polyethylene failure is an uncommon complication of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of the favourable tribological characteristics of these implants. We present a case of a 50-year-old woman who formerly underwent bilateral ceramic-on-polyethylene THA with expansion acetabular cups and eleven years later presented with unilateral THA dislocation, secondary to catastrophic polyethylene failure and metal shell fracture. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient came to our hospital for worsening pain in her left hip and an acute incapacity to bear weight on her left lower limb. Twelve and eleven years earlier she had undergone bilateral ceramic-on-polyethylene THA with acetabular expansion components of identical size on both sides. Radiographically, the left femoral head appeared superiorly dislocated and severe polyethylene wear was detected. The inclination angles of the left and right cups were 60° and 44°, respectively. The patient underwent left acetabular revision, and complete polyethylene wear-through with fracture of a cranial lobe of the expansion metal shell was noted at surgery. One large osteolytic lesion in the roof of the acetabulum and diffuse periarticular metallosis were also present. These findings required the use of a Burch­Schneider reinforcement cage. Two years later the patient is functioning well and has full autonomy in her activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The correct inclination of the acetabular component is necessary to prevent accelerated polyethylene wear in THA, even though favourable articular bearing surfaces have been used (e.g., ceramic-on-polyethylene coupling). Should the cup appear well fixed and fairly oriented on follow-up radiographies, the early detection of severe polyethylene wear may permit a revision of only the femoral head and acetabular liner.