Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after general surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the incidence and determinants of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in a general surgical patient population. DESIGN: This is a prospective cross-sectional study at a university-affiliated clinic/level 1 trauma center. Patients were followed at least 1 year postoperatively. By surgical discipline, procedures were 50% orthopedic/trauma, 33% general (abdominal/visceral), and 17% vascular. SETTING: All patients admitted during one year (N = 3020) were eligible. Exclusion criteria were cognitive impairment, communication/language barrier, nonoperative treatment, and refusal to participate. A CPSP questionnaire was completed. Step-by-step analysis followed with a 2(nd) questionnaire to detect CPSP with numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity ≥3. Finally, individual follow-up examinations were performed. RESULTS: 911 patients responded (30.2%). 522 complained of pain intensity ≥3 on NRS (scale 0-10). The second step identified 214 patients with chronic pain (NRS ≥3, mean 29 months postoperatively). On final examination, 83 CPSP patients (14.8%) were identified. By surgical discipline, 28% were general, 15% vascular, and 57% trauma/orthopedic surgery. Most oftenly cited pain sites were joint (49.4%), incisional/scar (37.7%), and nerve pain (33.7%). By procedure, patients underwent pelvic surgery, colon surgery, laparoscopies, inguinal herniorrhaphies, arthroscopies, and hardware extractions. All patients in the "laborer" and "unemployed" categories reported chronic pain. CONCLUSION: Bias due to study design and/or heterogeneity of patients is possible, but there was a high CPSP rate after 2 years both generally and particularly in orthopedic/trauma (57%) patients. Both "major" and "minor" surgical procedures led to CPSP.

Functional treatment and early weightbearing after an ankle fracture: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative care for ankle fractures is generally 1 of 2 regimens: 1) functional treatment combined with early weightbearing (EWB), or 2) immobilization in a cast/orthosis for 6 weeks without weightbearing (6WC). The objective of this study was 2-fold: 1) to follow a prospective group treated with EWB as to long-term subjective and objective outcomes, and 2) to compare a subset of this group with a matched group of historic controls treated with 6WC. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical, cohort observation, and retrospective matched pair analysis. SETTING: University hospital, level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-three patients (20 males; mean age, 49 +/- 14 years) with operated Weber B/C fractures underwent EWB. For comparison, 23 patients of this group were matched to a same number of historic controls with respect to age, gender, body mass index, and fracture type. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a 1/3-tubular-fibula-plate for the fibula, and malleolar screws for the medial malleolus fracture (in cases with a bimalleolar ankle fracture) followed by EWB or 6WC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Olerud and Tegner scores at follow-up (at least 12 months after surgery), time to full weightbearing, return to work, pain intensity (numerical rating scale (NRS)), and hospital stay. Statistical comparisons were performed by using the Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Patients with EWB were full weightbearing at 7 +/- 3 weeks and returned to work at 8 +/- 5 weeks after surgery. At follow-up (mean, 20 +/- 11 months after surgery), all EWB patients showed good results in the Olerud score (90 +/- 13 points). Matched-pair analysis in 23 patients in each group revealed differences between EWB and 6WC groups for hospital stay (mean, 10.8 +/- 4.7 vs. 13.6 +/- 6 days; P = 0.12), time to full weightbearing (mean, 7.7 +/- 3.1 vs. 13.5 +/- 9.4 weeks; P = 0.01), and time until return to work (mean 9.2 +/- 5.5 vs. 10.8 +/- 7 weeks; P = 0.63). No differences concerning pain intensities were observed (EWB vs. 6WC: NRS = 1.9 vs. 1.7; P = 0.12). At follow-up, Olerud scores were generally considered good for both groups; however, mean values in EWB patients were slightly higher (87 +/- 14 vs. 79 +/- 19 points; P = 0.25). In both groups, the majority of patients reached their preinjury level of activity as demonstrated by Tegner scores. CONCLUSIONS: EWB patients tolerated earlier full weightbearing compared with 6WC patients, and there were no disadvantages with EWB compared with 6WC concerning hospital stay, pain intensities, time until return to work, and Olerud/Tegner Scores. Potential candidates for EWB are patients with a stable osteosynthesis of their fractured ankles as judged by the responsible surgeon, compliance, and high motivation.