Safety and efficacy of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers an alternative to inpatient (hospital bed-based) treatment of infections that require intravenous administration of antimicrobials. This meta-analysis aimed to summarise the evidence available from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of OPAT compared to inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Sciences databases for RCTs comparing outpatient versus inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. We included studies without restrictions on language or publication year. Eligibility was reviewed independently by two assessors, and data extraction was cross validated. We evaluated bias risk via the Cochrane tool and determined the evidence certainty using GRADE. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. The protocol of this review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023460389). RESULT: Thirteen RCTs, involving 1,310 participants were included. We found no difference in mortality (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.23 to 1.26; p = 0.93), treatment failure (RR 1.0, CI 0.59 to 1.72; p = 0.99), adverse reaction related to antimicrobials (RR 0.89, CI 0.69 to 1.15; p = 0.38), and administration device (RR 0.58, CI 0.17 to 1.98; p = 0.87) between outpatient and inpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. The overall body of evidence had a low level of certainty. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests OPAT is a safe and effective alternative to inpatient treatment. Further RCTs are warranted for a thorough comparison of inpatient and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with a high level of certainty.

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including ß-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Evaluation of the stability of ceftazidime/avibactam in elastomeric infusion devices used for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy utilizing a national stability protocol framework.

Objectives: To evaluate the stability of ceftazidime/avibactam in elastomeric infusers, utilizing the UK's Yellow Cover Document (YCD) stability testing framework, in conditions representative of OPAT practice. Methods: Ceftazidime/avibactam was reconstituted with sodium chloride 0.9% (w/v) in two elastomeric infusers at concentrations (dose) levels of 1500/375, 3000/750 and 6000 mg/1500 mg in 240 mL. The infusers were exposed to a fridge storage (2°C-8°C) for 14 days followed by 24 h in-use temperature (32°C). Results: After 14 days of fridge storage and subsequent 24 h exposure to 32°C, mean ±â€ŠSD of ceftazidime percent remaining was 75.5% ±â€Š1.8%, 79.9% ±â€Š1.1%, 82.4% ±â€Š0.6%, for Easypump, and 81.7% ±â€Š1.2%, 82.5% ±â€Š0.5%, 85.4% ±â€Š1.1% for Dosi-Fuser devices at the high, intermediate and low doses tested, respectively. For avibactam, mean ±â€ŠSD percent remaining was 83.2% ±â€Š1.8%, 87.4% ±â€Š2.0%, 93.1% ±â€Š0.9% for Easypump, and 85.1% ±â€Š2.0%, 86.7% ±â€Š0.1%, 92.5% ±â€Š0.1% for Dosi-Fuser devices. The cumulative amount of pyridine generated in the devices ranged from 10.4 mg at low dose to 76.9 mg at high dose. Regression-based simulation showed that the degradation of both ceftazidime and avibactam was <10% for at least 12 h of the running phase, if stored in a fridge for not more than 72 h prior to in-use temperature exposure. Conclusions: Whilst not meeting the strict UK YCD criteria for ≤5% degradation, ceftazidime/avibactam may be acceptable to administer as a continuous 12 hourly infusion in those territories where degradation of ≤10% is deemed acceptable.

What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for ß-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For ß-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/PD exposure requirements of BLIs for optimal microbiological efficacy when used in combination with ß-lactam antibiotics. METHODS: Literature was searched online through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to 5 June 2023. Studies that report the PK/PD index and threshold concentration of BLIs approved for clinical use were included. Narrative data synthesis was carried out to assimilate the available evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included. The PK/PD index that described the efficacy of BLIs was fT>CT for tazobactam, avibactam and clavulanic acid and fAUC0-24/MIC for relebactam and vaborbactam. The optimal magnitude of the PK/PD index is variable for each BLI based on the companion ß-lactam antibiotics, type of bacteria and ß-lactamase enzyme gene transcription levels. CONCLUSIONS: The PK/PD index that describes the efficacy of BLIs and the exposure measure required for their efficacy is variable among inhibitors; as a result, it is difficult to make clear inference on what the optimum index is. Further PK/PD profiling of BLI, using preclinical infection models that simulate the anticipated mode(s) of clinical use, is warranted to streamline the exposure targets for use in the optimization of dosing regimens.

The global epidemiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the global prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: The systematic search was conducted in four databases. Original studies describing MDR P. aeruginosa VAP prevalence in adults from 2012- 2022 were included. A meta-analysis, using the random effects model, was conducted for overall, subgroups (country, published year, study duration, and study design), and European data, respectively. Univariate meta-regression based on pooled estimates was also conducted. Systematic review registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42022384035). RESULTS: In total of 31 studies, containing a total of 7951 cases from 16 countries, were included. The overall pooled prevalence of MDR among P. aeruginosa causing VAP was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27.7-38.3%). The highest prevalence was for Iran at 87.5% (95% CI 69-95.7%), and the lowest was for the USA at 19.7% (95% CI 18.6-20.7%). The European prevalence was 29.9% (95% CI 23.2-36.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that the prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa in patients with VAP is generally high and varies significantly between countries; however, data are insufficient for many countries. The data in this study can provide a reference for VAP management and drug customisation strategies.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli Urosepsis: A Review.

Escherichia coli is a versatile commensal and pathogenic member of the human microflora. As the primary causative pathogen in urosepsis, E. coli places an immense burden on healthcare systems worldwide. To further exacerbate the issue, multi drug resistance (MDR) has spread rapidly through E. coli populations, making infections more troublesome and costlier to treat. This paper aimed to review the literature concerning the development of MDR in uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and explore the existing evidence of current and emerging treatment strategies. While some MDR strains maybe treated with ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations as well as cephalosporins, cephamycin, temocillin and fosfomycin, current treatment strategies for many MDR UPEC strains are reliant on carbapenems. Carbapenem overreliance may contribute to the alarming dissemination of carbapenem-resistance amongst some UPEC communities, which has ushered in a new age of difficult to treat infections. Alternative treatment options for carbapenem resistant UPEC may include novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase or carbapenemase inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides or fosfomycin. For metallo-ß-lactamase producing strains (e.g., NDM, IMP-4), combinations of cefazidime-avibacam with aztreonam have been used. Additionally, the emergence of new antimicrobials brings new hope to the treatment of such infections. However, continued research is required to successfully bring these into the clinic for the treatment of MDR E. coli urosepsis.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of intermittent versus extended and continuous infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam in a hollow-fibre infection model against Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the bacterial killing and emergence of resistance of intermittent versus prolonged (extended and continuous infusions) infusion dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam against two Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). METHODS: Three piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion) against a ceftriaxone-susceptible, non-ESBL-producing E. coli 44 (Ec44, MIC 2 mg/L) and six piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion; 4/0.5 g 6 hourly as 0.5 and 3 h infusions and 16/2 g/24 h continuous infusion) were simulated against a ceftriaxone-resistant, AmpC- and ESBL-producing E. coli 50 (Ec50, MIC 8 mg/L) in a HFIM over 7 days (initial inoculum ∼107 cfu/mL). Total and less-susceptible subpopulations and MICs were determined. RESULTS: All simulated dosing regimens against Ec44 exhibited 4 log10 of bacterial killing over 8 h without regrowth and resistance emergence throughout the experiment. For Ec50, there was the initial bacterial killing of 4 log10 followed by regrowth to 1011 cfu/mL within 24 h against all simulated dosing regimens, and the MICs for resistant subpopulations exceeded 256 mg/L at 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that, for critically ill patients, conventional intermittent infusion, or prolonged infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam may suppress resistant subpopulations of non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates. However, intermittent, or prolonged infusions may not suppress the resistant subpopulations of AmpC- and ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates. More studies are required to confirm these findings.

Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin-Tazobactam/Amikacin Combination versus Meropenem against Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Carbapenems are recommended for the treatment of urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli; however, due to selection of carbapenem resistance, there is an increasing interest in alternative treatment regimens including the use of ß-lactam-aminoglycoside combinations. We compared the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin as mono and combination therapy versus meropenem monotherapy against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, piperacillin-tazobactam resistant E. coli using a dynamic hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) over 7 days. Broth-microdilution was performed to determine the MIC of E. coli isolates. Whole genome sequencing was conducted. Four E. coli isolates were tested in HFIM with an initial inoculum of ~107 CFU/mL. Dosing regimens tested were piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g, 6-hourly, plus amikacin 30 mg/kg, 24-hourly, as combination therapy, and piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g, 6-hourly, amikacin 30 mg/kg, 24-hourly, and meropenem 1 g, 8-hourly, each as monotherapy. We observed that piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin monotherapy demonstrated initial rapid bacterial killing but then led to amplification of resistant subpopulations. The piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin combination and meropenem experiments both attained a rapid bacterial killing (~4-5 log10) within 24 h and did not result in any emergence of resistant subpopulations. Genome sequencing demonstrated that all ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates carried multiple antibiotic resistance genes including blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaEC, blaTEM-1, and aac(6')-Ib-cr. These results suggest that the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin may have a potential role as a carbapenem-sparing regimen, which should be tested in future urosepsis clinical trials.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model.

BACKGROUND: Urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are commonly recommended for the treatment of ESBL infections; however, to minimize the emergence of carbapenem resistance, interest in alternative treatments has heightened. OBJECTIVES: This study compared pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli clinical isolates. METHODS: E. coli isolates, obtained from national reference laboratory in Bangladesh, were characterized by phenotypic tests, WGS, susceptibility tests and mutant frequency analysis. Three ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g, every 6 h and every 8 h, 30 min infusion) and meropenem (1 g, every 8 h, 30 min infusion) in a hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days. RESULTS: Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens attained ∼4-5 log10 cfu/mL bacterial killing within 24 h and prevented resistance emergence over the experiment against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli. However, compared with 8 hourly meropenem, the 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam attained ∼1 log10 lower bacterial kill against one of three ESBL-producing E. coli (CTAP#173) but comparable killing for the other two ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-producing E. coli (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180). The 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam regimen attained ∼1 log10 greater bacterial kill compared with the 8 hourly regimen against CTAP#168 and CTAP#179 at 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests piperacillin/tazobactam may be a potential alternative to carbapenems to treat urosepsis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, although clinical trials with robust design are needed to confirm non-inferiority of outcome.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing versus non-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in a hollow-fibre infection model.

Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli are a global public-health concern. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) dosing regimens against ESBL-producing versus non-ESBL-producing E. coli. Five E. coli clinical isolates were obtained from Bangladesh. Broth microdilution and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were performed on the five studied isolates. Three TZP-susceptible ESBL-producing and two non-ESBL-producing E. coli were exposed to TZP regimens of 4.5 g every 6 h (q6h) and every 8 h (q8h) as a 30-min infusion in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days. The extent of bacterial killing was ∼4-5 log10 CFU/mL against ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli with TZP q6h and q8h regimens over the first 8 h. Bacterial killing was similar between two of three ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-ESBL-producing (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180) E. coli clinical isolates over the course of the experiment. ESBL-producing CTAP#173 E. coli was poorly killed (∼1 log) compared with two non-ESBL-producing E. coli over 168 h. WGS revealed that ESBL-producing E. coli isolates co-harboured multiple antimicrobial resistance genes such as blaCTX-M-15, blaEC, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1 and aac(6')-Ib-cr5. Overall, TZP q6h and q8h dosing regimens attained >3 log bacterial kill against all ESBL-producing or non-ESBL-producing E. coli within 24 h and maintained and prevented the emergence of resistance through the end of the experiment. In conclusion, TZP standard regimens resulted in similar bacterial killing and prevented the emergence of resistance against CTX-M-15-type ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

Multicenter Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Unbound Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients.

The objective of this study was to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill adult patients and to define optimized dosing regimens. Total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were obtained from two pharmacokinetic studies and from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at a tertiary hospital intensive care unit. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the probability of achieving a free trough concentration/MIC ratio of ≥1 using Pmetrics for R. A total of 474 samples (267 total and 207 unbound) were available from 36 patients. A two-compartment model describing ceftriaxone-albumin binding with both nonrenal and renal elimination incorporating creatinine clearance to explain the between-patient variability best described the data. An albumin concentration of ≤20 g/L decreased the probability of target attainment (PTA) by up to 20% across different dosing regimens and simulated creatinine clearances. A ceftriaxone dose of 1 g twice daily is likely therapeutic in patients with creatinine clearance of <100 mL/min infected with susceptible isolates (PTA, ~90%). Higher doses administered as a continuous infusion (4 g/day) are needed in patients with augmented renal clearance (creatinine clearance, >130 mL/min) who are infected by pathogens with a MIC of ≥0.5 mg/L. The ceftriaxone dose should be based on the patient's renal function and albumin concentration, as well as the isolate MIC. Hypoalbuminemia decreases the PTA in patients receiving intermittent dosing by up to 20%.

Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 105 CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with ß-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive ß-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained.

Epidemiology of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in South Asia.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) and metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Escherichia coli in South Asia. Methodology: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus. Results: The pooled prevalence of ESBL and MBL-producing E. coli in South Asia were 33% (95% CI: 27-40%) and 17% (95% CI: 12-24%), respectively. The prevalence of blaCTX-M type was 58% (95% CI: 49-66%) with blaCTX-M-15 being the most prevalent (51%, 95% CI: 40-62%) variant. The most prevalent MBL variant was blaNDM-1 (33%, 95% CI: 20-50%). Conclusion: This study suggests a high prevalence of ESBLs and MBLs among E. coli clinical isolates. Comprehensive resistance surveillance is required to guide clinicians prescribing antibiotics in South Asia.

Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

BACKGROUND: Even though nebulised administration of amikacin can achieve high epithelial lining fluid concentrations, this has not translated into improved patient outcomes in clinical trials. One possible reason is that the cellular and chemical composition of the epithelial lining fluid may inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify whether the epithelial lining fluid components inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing. METHODS: Two amikacin-susceptible (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2 and 8 mg/L) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were exposed in vitro to amikacin concentrations up to 976 mg/L in the presence of an acidic pH, mucin and/or surfactant as a means of simulating the epithelial lining fluid, the site of bacterial infection in pneumonia. Pharmacodynamic modelling was used to describe associations between amikacin concentrations, bacterial killing and emergence of resistance. RESULTS: In the presence of broth alone, there was rapid and extensive (> 6 - log10) bacterial killing, with emergence of resistance identified in amikacin concentrations < 976 mg/L. In contrast, the rate and extent of bacterial killing was reduced (≤ 5 - log10) when exposed to an acidic pH and mucin. Surfactant did not appreciably impact the bacterial killing or resistance emergence when compared with broth alone for either isolate. The combination of mucin and an acidic pH further reduced the rate of bacterial killing, with the maximal bacterial killing occurring 24 h following initial exposure compared with approximately 4-8 h for either mucin or an acidic pH alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that simulating the epithelial lining fluid antagonises amikacin-mediated killing of P. aeruginosa, even at the high concentrations achieved following nebulised administration.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of meropenem and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are commonly used. In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of meropenem-sulbactam combination (MEM/SUL) against CR-AB. The checkerboard method was used to screen for synergistic activity of MEM/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates. Subsequently, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. Time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of 2-log kill, 1-log kill or stasis at 24-h following combination therapy. The MEM/SUL demonstrated synergy against 28/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC50 and MIC90 of MEM/SUL were decreased fourfold, compared to the monotherapy MIC. In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed synergistic killing against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. At concentrations equal to the fractional inhibitory concentration, synergism was observed against one isolate. The PK/PD model adequately delineated the data and the interaction between meropenem and sulbactam. The effect of the combination was driven by sulbactam, with meropenem acting as a potentiator. The simulations of various dosing regimens revealed no activity for the monotherapies. At best, the MEM/SUL regimen of 2 g/4 g every 8 h demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 2-log10 kill at 24 h of 34%. The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log10 reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that MEM/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

A validated LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of the novel combination antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam, in plasma (total and unbound), CSF, urine and renal replacement therapy effluent: application to pilot pharmacokinetic studies.

OBJECTIVES: Novel treatment options for some carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens have been identified by the World Health Organization as being of the highest priority. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic with potent bactericidal activity against the most difficult-to-treat multi-drug resistant and extensively drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to develop and validate a liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of ceftolozane and tazobactam in plasma (total and unbound), renal replacement therapy effluent (RRTE), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine. METHODS: Analytes were separated using mixed-mode chromatography with an intrinsically base-deactivated C18 column and a gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid, 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile. The analytes and internal standards were detected using rapid ionisation switching between positive and negative modes with simultaneous selected reaction monitoring. RESULTS: A quadratic calibration was obtained for plasma (total and unbound), RRTE and CSF over the concentration range of 1-200 mg/L for ceftolozane and 0.5-100 mg/L for tazobactam, and for urine the concentration range of 10-2,000 mg/L for ceftolozane and 5-1,000 mg/L for tazobactam. For both ceftolozane and tazobactam, validation testing for matrix effects, precision and accuracy, specificity and stability were all within the acceptance criteria of ±15%. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology was successfully applied to one pilot pharmacokinetic study in infected critically ill patients, including patients receiving renal replacement therapy, and one case study of a patient with ventriculitis, where all patients received ceftolozane-tazobactam.

Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Meropenem and Fosfomycin Combination Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Patients with Normal Renal Clearance: Can It Be a Treatment Option?

Background and Objective: Combination therapy may be a treatment option against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections. In this study, we explored the utility of fosfomycin in combination with meropenem (FOS/MEM) against CR-AB isolates. Materials and Methods: Screening of synergistic activity of FOS/MEM was performed using the checkerboard assay. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed for various FOS/MEM regimens using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the isolates (MIC50) and MIC required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the isolates (MIC90) of FOS and MEM were reduced fourfold and twofold, respectively. The combination was synergistic against 14/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. Sixteen out of fifty isolates had MEM MICs of ≤8 mg/L when subjected to combination therapy, compared to none with monotherapy. Forty-one out of 50 isolates had FOS MICs of ≤128 mg/L when subjected to combination therapy, compared to 17/50 isolates with monotherapy. The cumulative fraction response for MEM and FOS improved from 0% to 40% and 40% to 80%, with combination therapy, respectively. Conclusions: Addition of MEM improved the in vitro activity of FOS against the CR-AB isolates. FOS/MEM could be a plausible option to treat CR-AB for a small fraction of isolates.

Ceftriaxone dosing in patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis.

PURPOSE: Unbound ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in adult patients have been poorly characterised. The objective of this study is to determine the ceftriaxone dose that achieves an unbound trough concentration ≥ 0.5 mg/L in > 90% of adult patients receiving once-daily dosing presenting to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic study. A single unbound plasma ceftriaxone concentration was obtained from each patient using blood collected as part of routine clinical practice within the first dosing interval. Samples were analysed using a validated ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. RESULTS: A ceftriaxone concentration obtained throughout the first dosing interval was available for fifty adult patients meeting sepsis criteria. Using this concentration time-curve data, a pharmacokinetic model was developed with acceptable predictive performance per the visual predictive check. Simulations show that a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve the minimum therapeutic ceftriaxone exposure in > 90% patients with a creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min. However, a 2-g once-daily dose will provide a therapeutic exposure for target pathogens infecting patients with a creatinine clearance ≤ 140 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone administered as a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve a therapeutic exposure in > 90% of patients presenting to the ED with sepsis. Increasing the ceftriaxone dose to 2 g once daily will likely achieve the desired exposure against target pathogens. Future clinical trials are required to determine any potential clinical benefit of optimised ceftriaxone dosing.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Penetration of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients with an Indwelling External Ventricular Drain.

The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane-tazobactam in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of infected critically ill patients. In a prospective observational study, critically ill patients (≥18 years) with an indwelling external ventricular drain received a single intravenous dose of 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam. Serial plasma and CSF samples were collected for measurement of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam concentration by liquid chromatography. Unbound concentration-time data were modeled in R using Pmetrics. Dosing simulations were performed using the final model. A three-compartment model adequately described the data from 10 patients. For ceftolozane, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) area under the unbound concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (fAUC0-inf) in the CSF and plasma were 30 (19 to 128) h·mg/liter and 323 (183 to 414) h·mg/liter, respectively. For tazobactam, these values were 5.6 (2 to 24) h·mg/liter and 52 (36 to 80) h·mg/liter, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) CSF penetration ratios were 0.2 ± 0.2 and 0.2 ± 0.26 for ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively. With the regimen of 3.0 g every 8 h, a probability of target attainment (PTA) of ≥0.9 for 40% fT>MIC in the CSF was possible only when MICs were ≤0.25 mg/liter. The CSF cumulative fractional response for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-susceptible MIC distribution was 73%. The tazobactam PTA for the minimal suggested exposure of 20% fT>1 mg/liter was 12%. The current maximal dose of ceftolozane-tazobactam (3.0 g every 8 h) does not provide adequate CSF exposure for treatment of Gram-negative meningitis or ventriculitis unless the MIC for the causative pathogen is very low (≤0.25 mg/liter).