Social determinants of health and clinical outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation. Evidence from a global federated health research network.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the role of SDoH in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AIM: To investigate the relationship between SDoH and adverse events in a large multinational AF cohort. DESIGN: Retrospective study utilizing a global federated health research network (TriNetX). METHODS: Patients with AF were categorized as socially deprived defined according to ICD codes based on three SDoHs: i) extreme poverty; ii) unemployment; iii) and/or problems related with living alone. The outcomes were the five-year risk of a composite outcomes of all-cause death, hospitalization, ischemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure, or severe ventricular arrhythmias. Cox-regression was used to compute hazard rate ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) following 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: The study included 24,631 socially deprived (68.8 ± 16.0 years; females 51.8%) and 2,462,092 non-deprived AF patients (75.5 ± 13.1 years; females 43.8%). Before PSM, socially deprived patients had a higher risk of the composite outcome (HR 1.9, 95%CI 1.87-1.93), all-cause death (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.28-1.39), hospitalization (HR 2.01, 95%CI 1.98-2.04), ischemic heart disease (HR 1.67, 95%CI 1.64-1.70), stroke (HR 2.60, 95%CI 2.51-2.64), heart failure (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.86-1.96) and severe ventricular arrhythmias (HR 1.83, 95%CI 1.76-1.90) compared to non-deprived AF patients. The PSM based hazard ratios for the primary composite outcome were 1.54 (95%CI 1.49-1.60) for the unemployed AF patients; 1.39 (95%CI 1.31-1.47) for patients with extreme poverty or with low income; and 1.42 (95%CI 1.37-1.47) for those with problems related with living alone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, social deprivation is associated with an increased risk of death and adverse cardiac events. The presence of possible unmeasured bias associated with the retrospective design requires confirmation in future prospective studies.

Time trends in income-related disparity in incidence of acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Higher incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), among those with lower income, has been recognized in the most recent decades. Still, there is a paucity of data on temporal changes. This study aims to investigate 20-year time trends in income-related disparity in the incidence of ACS in Denmark. METHODS: This Population-based repeated cross-sectional study included all patients with first-time ACS, aged ≥20 years, registered in the Danish National Patient Registry 1998-2017. Aggregated sociodemographic data for the Danish population was accessed from Statistics Denmark. Yearly incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR), with the highest-income quartile as a reference, were standardized using cell-specific personal equivalent income according to year, sex and age group with 95% confidence intervals. Interaction analysis was executed for differences in IR of ACS between the lowest- and highest-income quartile over time. RESULTS: A total of 220 070 patients hospitalized with ACS from 1998 to 2017 were identified. The yearly standardized ACS IRs decreased in all income quartiles. However, the IR remained higher in the lowest-income quartile compared to the highest for both men [1998: IRR 1.45 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.39-1.52) and 2017: 1.47 (1.40-1.54)] and women [1998: IRR 1.73 (1.64-1.82) and 2017: 1.76 (1.65-1.88)]. Interaction analysis showed that over the period the difference in IR between the lower- and the highest-income quartile decreased with 1-5 ACS cases per 100 000 person-year. CONCLUSION: Income-related disparity in the incidence of ACS was present in Denmark between 1998 and 2017. Despite a marked overall decrease in the yearly ACS incidence, the extent of income-related disparity remained unchanged.

Temporal trends in socioeconomic disparity in clinical outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

AIMS: Socioeconomic factors are well-established determinants of clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) although quality of care has improved the last decades. This study aims to investigate 20-years temporal trends of socioeconomic disparity in 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among ACS patients in Denmark. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all incident ACS patients in the Danish National Patient Registry during 1998-2017. Socioeconomic disparity was assessed by income and educational level. Patients were followed 1-year for MACE; defined as all-cause mortality, recurrent ACS, revascularization, stroke, or cardiac arrest. Adjusted MACE incidence rates (aIR) and hazard rate ratios (aHR) were computed with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for five-year-periods. Changes in trends were examined from interaction analyses between the HR for five-year-periods and income and education, respectively. RESULTS: The study included 220,887 patients with first-time ACS. The incidence of MACE decreased within all income and education levels. In 1998-2002 the MACE aIR among patients with low income was 885[95%CI:863-907] versus 733[711-756]/1000-person-year among those with high income (aHR: 1.19[95%CI:1.15-1.23]). The aIRs decreased to 506[489-522] and 405[388-423]/1000-person-year, respectively, in 2013-2017 (aHR: 1.23[1.17-1.29]). The aIRs of MACE decreased correspondingly within all educational levels from 1998 to 2002 to 2013-2017. However, the socioeconomic disparity according to the interaction analyses persisted both according to income and educational level. CONCLUSION: Although 1-year clinical outcomes following ACS has improved substantially over the last decades, socioeconomic disparity persisted both according to income and education level.

Socioeconomic inequity in incidence, outcomes and care for acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequities in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) epidemiology and care have been reported for at least 30-40 years. However, an up-to-date overview of evidence reflecting current clinical practice is not available. This systematic review aimed to summarize literature published in the last decade, regarding the association between socioeconomic position (SEP), incidence and prevalence of ACS, post-ACS medical care, and mortality. METHODS: The systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase restricted to publication year (2009-2021), according to predefined methods (PROSPERO: CRD42020197654). Results were classified according to outcomes and socioeconomic exposures, and the risk of bias was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 181 studies were included, mainly from high-income countries (81%). The majority showed an association between lower SEP (i.e. education, income, occupation, insurance, or composite SEP) and increased ACS incidence (89%)(incidence rate ratios: 1.1-4.7), increased ACS prevalence (88%)(odds ratios (ORs): 1.8-3.9), receiving suboptimal ACS-related medical care (46%)(ORs: 1.1-10.0), or increased post-ACS mortality (71%)(hazard rate ratios: 1.1-4.13). Studies with a lower risk of bias appeared more likely to describe inequity in favor of higher SEP than studies with a higher risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Across studies from the last decade, lower SEP is associated with higher risks of ACS, subsequent suboptimal medical care, and mortality among the ACS patients, in particular in studies with a lower risk of bias. This indicates considerable socioeconomic inequity among ACS patients internationally, despite low- and middle-low-income countries being inadequately represented. Thus, efforts are warranted to continuously monitor ACS-related socioeconomic inequity.

The association between initial opioid type and long-term opioid use after hip fracture surgery in elderly opioid-naïve patients.

Objectives Long-term opioid use after hip fracture surgery has been demonstrated in previously opioid-naïve elderly patients. It is unknown if the opioid type redeemed after hip surgery is associated with long-term opioid use. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the opioid type redeemed within the first three months after hip fracture surgery and opioid use 3-12 months after the surgery. Methods A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using data from Danish health registries (2005-2015). Previously opioid-naïve patients registered in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, aged ≥65 years, who redeemed ≥1 opioid prescription within three months after the surgery, were included. Long-term opioid use was defined as ≥1 redeemed prescription within each of three three-month periods within the year after hip fracture surgery. The proportion with long-term opioid use after surgery, conditioned on nine-month survival, was calculated according to opioid types within three months after surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for different opioid types were computed by logistic regression analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using morphine as reference. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, comorbidity and calendar time before and after 2010. Results The study included 26,790 elderly, opioid-naïve patients with opioid use within three months after hip fracture surgery. Of these patients, 21% died within nine months after the surgery. Among the 21,255 patients alive nine months after surgery, 15% became long-term opioid users. Certain opioid types used within the first three months after surgery were associated with long-term opioid use compared to morphine (9%), including oxycodone (14%, aOR; 1.76, 95% CI 1.52-2.03), fentanyl (29%, aOR; 4.37, 95% CI 3.12-6.12), codeine (13%, aOR; 1.55, 95% CI 1.14-2.09), tramadol (13%, aOR; 1.56, 95% CI 1.35-1.80), buprenorphine (33%, aOR; 5.37, 95% CI 4.14-6.94), and >1 opioid type (27%, aOR; 3.83, 95% CI 3.31-4.44). The proportion of long-term opioid users decreased from 18% before 2010 to 13% after 2010. Conclusions The findings suggest that use of certain opioid types after hip fracture surgery is more associated with long-term opioid use than morphine and the proportion initiating long-term opioid use decreased after 2010. The findings suggest that some elderly, opioid-naïve patients appear to be presented with untreated pain conditions when seen in the hospital for a hip fracture surgery. Decisions regarding the opioid type prescribed after hospitalization for hip fracture surgery may be linked to different indication for pain treatment, emphasizing the likelihood of careful and conscientious opioid prescribing behavior.

Chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery.

Background and aims Bariatric surgery remains a mainstay for treatment of morbid obesity. However, long-term adverse outcomes include chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use. The aim of this review was to assess the existing data on prevalence, possible mechanisms, risk factors, and outcomes regarding chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery. Methods PubMed was screened for relevant literature focusing on chronic abdominal pain, persistent opioid use and pharmacokinetic alterations of opioids after bariatric surgery. Relevant papers were cross-referenced to identify publications possibly not located during the ordinary screening. Results Evidence regarding general chronic pain status after bariatric surgery is sparse. However, our literature review revealed that abdominal pain was the most prevalent complication to bariatric surgery, presented in 3-61% of subjects with health care contacts or readmissions 1-5 years after surgery. This could be explained by behavioral, anatomical, and/or functional disorders. Persistent opioid use and doses increased after bariatric surgery, and 4-14% initiated a persistent opioid use 1-7 years after the surgery. Persistent opioid use was associated with severe pain symptoms and was most prevalent among subjects with a lower socioeconomic status. Alteration of absorption and distribution after bariatric surgery may impact opioid effects and increase the risk of adverse events and development of addiction. Changes in absorption have been briefly investigated, but the identified alterations could not be separated from alterations caused solely by excessive weight loss, and medication formulation could influence the findings. Subjects with persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery achieved lower weight loss and less metabolic benefits from the surgery. Thus, remission from comorbidities and cost effectiveness following bariatric surgery may be limited in these subjects. Conclusions Pain, especially chronic abdominal, and persistent opioid use were found to be prevalent after bariatric surgery. Physiological, anatomical, and pharmacokinetic changes are likely to play a role. However, the risk factors for occurrence of chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use have only been scarcely examined as have the possible impact of pain and persistent opioid use on clinical outcomes, and health-care costs. This makes it difficult to design targeted preventive interventions, which can identify subjects at risk and prevent persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery. Future studies could imply pharmacokinetic-, pharmacodynamics-, and physiological-based modelling of pain treatment. More attention to social, physiologic, and psychological factors may be warranted in order to identify specific risk profiles of subjects considered for bariatric surgery in order to tailor and optimize current treatment recommendations for this population.

Opioid use after hip fracture surgery: A Danish nationwide cohort study from 2005 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a knowledge gap regarding persistent opioid use after hip fracture surgery. Thus, opioid use within a year after hip fracture surgery in patients with/without opioid use before surgery was examined. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all patients (aged ≥ 65) undergoing primary hip fracture surgery in Denmark (2005-2015) identified from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Database. Opioid use was assessed from The Danish National Health Service Prescription Database as redeemed prescriptions. The proportion of patients with ≥1 opioid prescription was computed within 6 months before surgery and each of four 3-month periods (quarters) after surgery, among patients alive first day in each period. Proportion differences (95% CI) were calculated for each quarter compared to before surgery. Proportions were calculated for users and nonusers before surgery, including initiators after first quarter. RESULTS: This study included 69,456 patients. Proportion differences of opioid users were 35.0 (95% CI 34.5-35.5), 7.0 (95% CI 6.5-7.5), 2.9 (95% CI 2.4-3.4) and 1.4 percentage-points (95% CI 0.9-1.9) the four quarters after surgery compared to before. Among opioid nonusers before surgery, 54.7% (95% CI 54.3-55.1), 21.8% (95% CI 21.4-22.2), 17.8% (95% CI 17.4-18.2) and 16.8% (95% CI 16.4-17.2) were opioid users in 1st-4th quarter after surgery. However, 8.5% (95% CI 8.2-8.7) of the nonusers before surgery in 4th quarter initiated opioid use more than a quarter after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of opioid users increased after hip fracture surgery and was 1.4 percentage-points increased in fourth quarter compared to before. Of opioid nonusers before surgery, 16.8% were opioid users fourth quarter after surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: Opioid use 1 year after hip fracture surgery is common, both in patients who were opioid users and nonusers before the surgery. These significant findings point out the need for indication of benefits and risks of opioid use in the acute and long-term management of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.