Patient Perceptions of Illness Causes and Treatment Preferences for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a condition with high patient morbidity and mortality. Research shows that eliciting patient explanations about illness causes and treatment preferences promotes cross-cultural work and engagement in health services. These topics are in the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), a semi-structured interview first published in DSM-5 that applies anthropological approaches within mental health services to promote person-centered care. This study focuses on the New York City site of an international multi-site study that used qualitative-quantitative mixed methods to: (1) analyze CFI transcripts with 55 adults with OCD to explore perceived illness causes and treatment preferences, and (2) explore whether past treatment experiences are related to perceptions about causes of current symptoms. The most commonly named causes were circumstantial stressors (n = 16), genetics (n = 12), personal psychological traits (n = 9), an interaction between circumstantial stressors and participants' brains (n = 6), and a non-specific brain problem (n = 6). The most common treatment preferences were psychotherapy (n = 42), anything (n = 4), nothing (n = 4), and medications (n = 2). Those with a prior medication history had twice the odds of reporting a biological cause, though this was not a statistically significant difference. Our findings suggest that providers should ask patients about illness causes and treatment preferences to guide treatment choice.

Perioperative Health Interventions in Children With Chronic Neuromuscular Conditions Undergoing Major Musculoskeletal Surgery: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with chronic neuromuscular conditions (CCNMC) have many coexisting conditions and often require musculoskeletal surgery for progressive neuromuscular scoliosis or hip dysplasia. Adequate perioperative optimization may decrease adverse perioperative outcomes. The purpose of this scoping review was to allow us to assess associations of perioperative health interventions (POHI) with perioperative outcomes in CCNMC. METHODS: Eligible articles included those published from January 1, 2000 through March 1, 2022 in which the authors evaluated the impact of POHI on perioperative outcomes in CCNMC undergoing major musculoskeletal surgery. Multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched by using controlled vocabulary terms and relevant natural language keywords. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were used to perform the review. A risk of bias assessment for included studies was performed by using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS: A total of 7013 unique articles were initially identified, of which 6286 (89.6%) were excluded after abstract review. The remaining 727 articles' full texts were then reviewed for eligibility, resulting in the exclusion of 709 (97.5%) articles. Ultimately, 18 articles were retained for final analysis. The authors of these studies reported various impacts of POHI on perioperative outcomes, including postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Because of the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures, meta-analyses with pooled data were not feasible. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal various impacts of POHI in CCNMC undergoing major musculoskeletal surgery. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to better address the overall impact of specific interventions on perioperative outcomes in CCNMC.

Retrospective study comparing outcomes of multimodal epidural and erector spinae catheter pain protocols after pectus surgery.

INTRODUCTION: There are no optimal postoperative analgesia regimens for Nuss procedures. We compared the effectiveness of thoracic epidurals (EPI) and novel ambulatory erector spinae plane (ESP) catheters as part of multimodal pain protocols after Nuss surgery. METHODS: Data on demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details, length of stay (LOS), in hospital and post discharge pain/opioid use, side effects, and emergency department (ED) visits were collected retrospectively in children who underwent Nuss repair with EPI (N = 114) and ESP protocols (N = 97). Association of the group with length of stay (LOS), in hospital opioid use (intravenous morphine equivalents (MEq)/kg over postoperative day (POD) 0-2), and oral opioid use beyond POD7 was analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity scores, followed by multivariable regression. RESULTS: Groups had similar demographics. Compared to EPI, ESP had longer block time and higher rate of ketamine and dexmedetomidine use. LOS for ESP was 2 days IQR (2, 2) compared to 3 days IQR (3, 4) for EPI (p < 0.01). Compared to EPI, ESP group had higher opioid use (in MEq/kg) intraoperatively (0.32 (IQR 0.27, 0.36) vs. 0.28 (0.24, 0.32); p < 0.01) but lower opioid use on POD 0 (0.09 (IQR 0.04, 0.17) vs. 0.11 (0.08, 0.17); p = 0.03) and POD2 (0.00 (IQR 0.00, 0.00) vs. 0.04 (0.00, 0.06) ; p < 0.01). ESP group also had lower total in hospital opioid use (0.57 (IQR 0.42, 0.73) vs.0.82 (0.71, 0.91); p < 0.01), and shorter duration of post discharge opioid use (6 days (IQR 5,8) vs. 9 days (IQR 7,12) (p < 0.01). After IPTW adjustment, ESP continued to be associated with shorter LOS (difference -1.20, 95% CI: -1.38, -1.01, p < 0.01) and decreased odds for opioid use beyond POD7 (OR 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.24); p < 0.01). However, total in hospital opioid use in MEq/kg (POD0-2) was now similar between groups (difference -0.02 (95% CI: -0.09, -0.04); p = 0.50). The EPI group had higher incidence of emesis (29% v 4%, p < 0.01), while ESP had higher catheter malfunction rates (23% v 0%; p < 0.01) but both groups had comparable ED visits/readmissions. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Compared to EPI, multimodal ambulatory ESP protocol decreased LOS and postoperative opioid use, with comparable ED visits/readmissions. Disadvantages included higher postoperative pain scores, longer block times and higher catheter leakage/malfunction. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

How to Perform Quality Improvement Projects.

Safety and efficiency remain salient concerns for the US health-care system, especially in the face of growing health-care costs and morbidity from low-quality care. Current estimates suggest that more than 20% of health-care costs in the United States represent waste and low-value care, presenting numerous improvement opportunities. Although current guidelines and standards aim to address these problems, system processes and clinician behavior must also change to fill care gaps in the health-care system. Quality improvement (QI) is a systematic approach to safety or value gaps in care that uses data measured over time and then makes sequential, small changes to achieve a measurable aim. The Model for Improvement provides a general framework for approaching QI. In this review article, we describe the general approach to conducting QI studies in the health-care setting using the Model for Improvement as a guide, including identifying a problem, performing testing, measuring change, and implementing successful ideas. We also summarize common issues that QI teams face and should consider if sharing their QI work through publication. By following a systematic approach, QI teams can develop and implement interventions aimed at addressing gaps in care, thereby improving overall health-care value and safety for their patients.

Design and implementation of a novel patient-centered empowerment approach for pain optimisation in children undergoing major surgery.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric surgery is a stressful experience for patients and caregivers. While standardised protocols are the norm, patient-centred approaches are needed to empower patients/caregivers for an optimal perioperative pain experience. To address this gap, we employed a patient-centred approach using design thinking (DT) methodology to develop insights, map processes, identify opportunities and design solutions for individualised empowerment tools. METHODS: In consultation with DT experts, a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders (healthcare providers, patients who underwent pectus excavatum/scoliosis surgery and their caregivers), were invited to participate in surveys, interviews and focus groups. The project was conducted in two sequential stages each over 24 weeks-involving 7 families in stage 1 and 16 patients/17 caregivers in stage 2. Each stage consisted of three phases: design research (focus groups with key stakeholders to review and apply collective learnings, map processes, stressors, identify influencing factors and opportunities), concept ideation (benchmarking and co-creation of new solutions) and concept refinement. RESULTS: In stage 1, mapping of stress/anxiety peaks identified target intervention times. We identified positive and negative influencers as well as the need for consistent messaging from the healthcare team in our design research. Current educational tools were benchmarked, parent-child engagement dyads determined and healthcare-based technology-based solutions conceived. The 'hero's journey' concept which has been applied to other illness paradigms for motivation successfully the was adapted to describe surgery as a transformative experience. In stage 2, patient and caregiver expectations, distinct personas and responses to perioperative experience were categorised. Educational tools and an empowerment tool kit based on sensorial, thinking, relaxation and activity themes, tailored to parent/child categories were conceptualised. CONCLUSION: DT methodology provided novel family centred insights, enabling design of tailored empowerment toolkits to optimise perioperative experience. Adapting the hero's journey call to adventure may motivate and build resilience among children undergoing surgery.

Reducing Patient Length of Stay After Surgical Correction for Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical correction remains the most effective treatment of patients with severe neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). However, postoperative inpatient clinical care after spinal surgery for NMS patients is highly complex and variable, depending on the provider and/or institution. Our project used a quality improvement methodology to implement a standardized clinical care pathway for NMS patients during their primary spinal surgery, with the global aim of decreasing postoperative hospitalized length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed a postoperative pathway for nonambulatory patients with NMS after their primary, nonstaged corrective spinal surgery. The outcome measure was mean LOS, and the process measure was percentage compliance with the newly implemented NMS pathway. The team used statistical process control charts and measures were evaluated over 3 phases to assess the impact of the interventions over time: pretesting, testing, and sustain. RESULTS: The mean LOS decreased from 8.0 to 5.3 days; a statistically significant change based on statistical process control chart rules. Percentage compliance with the NMS pathway improved during the testing and sustain phases, compared with the pretesting phase. LOS variability decreased from pretesting to the combined testing and sustain phases. CONCLUSIONS: Using quality improvement methodology, we successfully standardized major components of clinical care for patients with NMS after spinal corrective surgery. Through enhanced care consistency, the mean postoperative LOS decreased by nearly 3 days and decreased LOS variability. Robust multidisciplinary involvement with key stakeholders ensured sustainability of these improvements.

Standardization of clinical care pathway leads to sustained decreased length of stay following Nuss pectus repair: A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postoperatively, standardized clinical care pathways (SCCPs) help patients reach necessary milestones for discharge. The objective of this study was to achieve 90% compliance with a pectus specific SCCP within 9 months of implementation. We hypothesized that adherence to a pectus SCCP following the Nuss procedure would decrease postsurgical length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary team implemented the pectus SCCP, including goals for mobility, lung recruitment, pain control, intake, and output. The full protocol included 42 components, tracked using chart reviews and a patient-directed checklist. The primary process measure was compliance with the pectus SCCP. The primary outcome measure was LOS; secondary outcomes were patient charges, patient satisfaction, and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Total study patients were n = 509: 159 patients pre-intervention, 350 patients post-intervention (80 implementation group; 270 sustain group). SCCP compliance data were collected on 164 patients post-intervention - 80 implementation, 84 sustain. LOS, ED visits, and hospital readmissions were recorded for all 509 patients. Mean LOS decreased from 4.5 days to 3.4 days, with >90% adherence to the pectus SCCP postintervention. There were no readmissions owing to pain despite earlier termination of epidural analgesia. Total patient charges decreased by 30% and patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: Using quality improvement methodology with strict adherence to a pectus SCCP, we had significant reduction in LOS and patient charge without compromising effective postoperative pain management or patient satisfaction. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical research; quality improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Clinical algorithm to manage anemia in epidermolysis bullosa.

Epidermolysis bullosa is a group of rare genetic disorders with multiple organ system involvement. In one severe form, recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, chronic anemia is common. This report outlines the multifactorial nature of anemia in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and presents a practical clinical algorithm based on expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of anemia in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Increasing PCP and Hospital Medicine Physician Verbal Communication During Hospital Admissions.

OBJECTIVES: During hospital admission, communication between primary care physicians (PCPs) and hospital medicine (HM) physicians provides an opportunity for collaboration. Two-way communication facilitates collaboration by allowing the receiver to ask and respond to questions. At our institution, most HM-to-PCP communication occurred by telephone call after discharge. Our specific aim was to increase the percentage of patients for whom a telephone conversation occurred between HM and PCPs during hospital admission from 40% to >80%. METHODS: An improvement team that included PCPs and HM physicians redesigned the process for communication with PCPs to emphasize collaboration during hospitalization. Interventions were used to target key drivers of information transparency, PCP and HM provider buy-in, the value of early call initiation, process standardization, accommodating provider availability, and preoccupation with failure. We used improvement-science methods and run charts to measure our progress and attain our goal. RESULTS: The median weekly percentage of patients with a phone call completed during hospitalization increased from 40% to 85% at the satellite campus and 40% to 80% at the main campus. In addition to the standardized use of a telephone operator system to route calls and follow-up on unplaced calls, critical interventions included feedback on PCP call preferences to providers and the provider script for calls. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs and HM physicians applied quality-improvement methodology to ensure reliable HM-PCP communication during hospital admission. Interventions to facilitate communication between providers and learners (who may otherwise have limited interaction), such as the scripting of phone calls and feedback from PCPs to HM physicians, were important for success.

Improving the Readability of Pediatric Hospital Medicine Discharge Instructions.

BACKGROUND: Readable discharge instructions may help caregivers understand and implement care plans following hospitalization. Many caregivers of hospitalized children, however, have limited literacy. We aimed to increase the percentage of discharge instructions written at 7th grade level or lower for hospital medicine patients from 13% to 80% in 6 months. METHODS: Quality improvement efforts targeted a 42-bed unit at the community satellite of our large, urban academic hospital. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, and parents focused on key drivers: family engagement in discharge process, standardization of discharge instructions, staff engagement in discharge preparedness, and audit and feedback of data. Improvement cycles included 1) education and implementation of a general discharge instruction template in the electronic health record (EHR); 2) visible reminders and tips for writing readable discharge instructions; 3) implementation of disease-specific discharge instruction templates in the EHR; and 4) individualized feedback to staff on readability and content of their written discharge instructions. Instructions were individually scored for readability using an online platform. An annotated control chart assessed the impact of interventions over time. RESULTS: Through sequential interventions over 6 months, the percentage of discharge instructions written at 7th grade or lower readability level increased from 13% to 98% and has been sustained for 4 months. The reliable use of the EHR templates was associated with our largest improvements. CONCLUSION: Use of standardized discharge instruction templates and rapid feedback to staff improved the readability of instructions. Next steps include adaptation and spread to other patient populations.

Local Pharmacy Partnership to Prevent Pediatric Asthma Reutilization in a Satellite Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: In our previous work, providing medications in-hand at discharge was a key strategy to reduce asthma reutilization (readmissions and emergency revisits) among children in a large, urban county. We sought to spread this work to our satellite hospital in an adjacent county. A key initial barrier was the lack of an outpatient pharmacy on site, so we sought to determine if a partnership with community pharmacies could improve the percentage of patients with medications in-hand at discharge, thus decreasing reutilization. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team partnered with community pharmacies. Using rapid-cycle improvement methods, the team aimed to reduce asthma reutilization by providing medications in-hand at discharge. Run charts were used to display the proportion of patients with asthma discharged with medications in-hand and to track 90-day reutilization rates. RESULTS: During the intervention period, the median percentage of patients with asthma who received medications in-hand increased from 0% to 82%. A key intervention was the expansion of the medication in-hand program to all patients. Additional changes included expanding team to evening stakeholders, narrowing the number of community partners, and building electronic tools to support key processes. The mean percentage of patients with asthma discharged from the satellite who had a readmission or emergency department revisit within 90 days of their index admission decreased from 18% to 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Impacting population-level asthma outcomes requires partnerships between community resources and health providers. When hospital resources are limited, community pharmacies are a potential partner, and providing access to medications in-hand at hospital discharge can reduce asthma reutilization.