Survival and Recurrence Patterns in Patients With Stomach Adenocarcinoma Receiving Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy After D2 Gastrectomy in a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute: A Retrospective Real-World Evidence Cohort Study.

Purpose: Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and chemo radiation therapy (CTRT) for stomach adenocarcinoma have reported equivocal results. Hence, the current retrospective cohort study assessed the long-term survival and recurrence outcomes of these therapies, to generate evidence in a real-world scenario. Methods and Materials: Pathologically confirmed patients with stomach adenocarcinoma aged ≥18 years who underwent gastrectomy and D2 lymph nodal dissection at a tertiary cancer hospital from January 2010 to October 2017 were enrolled. Hospital-based follow-up was performed until December 2021. Data were gathered from electronic medical records, supplemented by telephonic interviews for patients who could not come for physical follow-up. CT-alone and CTRT cohorts were compared in terms of survival and recurrence outcomes. Results: The analysis included 158 patients (mean age, 56.42 years; 63.9% male; CT-alone cohort, 69; CTRT cohort, 89). Patients in the CTRT cohort had significantly worse tumor characteristics at baseline (29.2% had the diffuse type of tumor, 94.4% had stage II or III, 68.5% had lympho-vascular space invasion, and 85.4% had lymph node involvement). Recurrence was observed in 13 (19.7%) of the 76 followed-up patients. Although locoregional recurrence was higher in the CT-alone cohort (7 vs 2), distant metastasis was higher in the CTRT cohort (3 vs 1). The overall 5-year survival was 67.0% (SE, 5.0%) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 75.0% (SE, 5.0%). On multivariate Cox regression, no variable was significantly associated with the overall survival, whereas age, positive lymph nodes without extracapsular extension, and lymph node-negative were significantly associated with RFS. The CTRT cohort had significantly (84.0%) higher RFS (hazard ratio, 0.161; 95% CI, 0.056-0.464; P < .001). Conclusions: Patients who received adjuvant CTRT after D2 dissection showed similar overall survival but significantly higher RFS than the CT-alone cohort, despite having worse baseline tumor characteristics.

Treatment Delay during Radiotherapy of Cancer Patients due to COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of treatment delay caused by COVID-19 infection on patients scheduled for radiotherapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this descriptive study, we analyzed all patients who were COVID-19 positive during the scheduled radiotherapy course, those who had an infection while on neoadjuvant treatment period, or during surgery before the start of radiation. The study period was from June 2020 to May 2021. A treatment delay was defined as a delay in starting the radiation treatment, a gap during their scheduled radiation treatment, or treatment discontinuation. All patients who had a treatment delay were followed-up till November 2021. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the study was 13 months. Ninety-four patients were selected for the study who met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-seven patients had a mild COVID-19 infection, while 17 had a moderate to severe illness. Of the entire cohort, 83 patients had a treatment delay. The median treatment delay (MTD) in days was 18 (6 to 47). Amongst those who had a treatment delay, 66 patients were treated with curative intent, of which 51 patients are on follow-up - 34 patients are disease-free (MTD - 18.5, 10 to 43), seven had either a residual disease or locoregional recurrence (MTD - 22, 10 to 32), seven had distant metastasis (MTD - 18, 15 to 47), and three patients died (MTD - 20, 8 to 27). Of three patients who died, only one died of COVID-19-related causes. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the mortality due to COVID-19 infection among those who underwent radiotherapy was low, a treatment delay might have caused adverse treatment outcomes. Longer follow-up of these patients is required to further establish this. It will remain debatable whether it was worth delaying radiotherapy for mild to moderate COVID-19 infection for a significant time to cause a potential cancer treatment failure.

Depth of Invasion as an Independent Predictor of Survival in Patients of Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue.

OBJECTIVE: Depth of invasion (DOI) has been incorporated in the new AJCC 8th classification. However, even with this new AJCC classification stage III oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) remains a heterogenous group. The study aims at finding a discreet group within stage III using DOI as a cut-off of 10 mm. METHODS: The institutional database was reviewed from 2012 to 2018 for postoperative stage III OTSCC patients who subsequently received postoperative radiotherapy. Ninety-six patients matched the inclusion criteria. Two groups were created using a DOI cut-off of 10 mm (superficial and deep groups). The groups were analyzed for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: The baseline and treatment characteristics were comparable between the groups except for the higher number of extensive surgeries, endophytic configuration, pT3 and, DOI in the deep group. For a median follow-up of 40.5 (range: 4-139) months, the median OS and RFS for the superficial group were not reached. The median OS and RFS for the deep group were 101 (range: 73.7-128.3) and 60 (range: 46.6-73.4) months, respectively. The difference was statistically significant for median RFS (P = .008) and trended toward significance for median OS (P = .066) for the superficial group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed DOI cut-off as a significant predictor for RFS but not for OS. CONCLUSION: DOI significantly predicts poor RFS. However, showed a trend toward poor OS. This study hints toward a possibility of sub-dividing stage III OTSCC based on DOI cut-off. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (Retrospective cohort study) Laryngoscope, 132:1594-1599, 2022.

Prospective study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 5 fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer - toxicities and response assessment.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The past 2 decades witnessed the strengthening of evidence favoring the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CHRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. The study aims to evaluate the response and acute toxicities to neoadjuvant CHRT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of rectal cancer. Predictive factors to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) were analyzed, as a secondary endpoint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent IMRT as part of neoadjuvant CHRT in the treatment of rectal cancer between August 2014 and December 2016 at a tertiary cancer care center were accrued for the study. The cohort underwent CHRT with IMRT technique at a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions concurrent with continuous infusion of 5 fluorouracil during the first and the last 4 days of CHRT. Surgery was performed 6 weeks later and the pathological response to CHRT was noted. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were accrued for the study. Radiation dermatitis and diarrhea were the only observed grade ≥3 acute toxicities. Sphincter preservation rate (SPR) was 43.3%. pCR was observed in 32.6%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression showed that carcinoembryonic antigen was the only independent predictive factor to achieve pCR. CONCLUSION: IMRT as part of neoadjuvant CHRT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is well tolerated and gives comparable results with respect to earlier studies in terms of pathological response and SPR. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to firmly state that IMRT is superior to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Cardiac Dose Reduction with Deep-Inspiratory Breath Hold Technique of Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Different techniques of radiation therapy have been studied to reduce the cardiac dose in left breast cancer. AIM: In this prospective dosimetric study, the doses to heart as well as other organs at risk (OAR) were compared between free-breathing (FB) and deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) techniques in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and opposed-tangent three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent computed tomography simulation and images were obtained in both FB and DIBH. Radiotherapy plans were generated with 3DCRT and IMRT techniques in FB and DIBH images in each patient. Target coverage, conformity index, homogeneity index, and mean dose to heart (Heart Dmean), left lung, left anterior descending artery (LAD) and right breast were compared between the four plans using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Target coverage was adequate with both 3DCRT and IMRT plans, but IMRT plans showed better conformity and homogeneity. A statistically significant dose reduction of all OARs was found with DIBH. 3DCRTDIBH decreased the Heart Dmean by 53.5% (7.1 vs. 3.3 Gy) and mean dose to LAD by 28% compared to 3DCRTFB. IMRT further lowered mean LAD dose by 18%. Heart Dmean was lower with 3DCRTDIBH over IMRTDIBH (3.3 vs. 10.2 Gy). Mean dose to the contralateral breast was also lower with 3DCRT over IMRT (0.32 vs. 3.35 Gy). Mean dose and the V20 of ipsilateral lung were lower with 3DCRTDIBH over IMRTDIBH (13.78 vs. 18.9 Gy) and (25.16 vs. 32.95%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3DCRTDIBH provided excellent dosimetric results in patients with left-sided breast cancer without the need for IMRT.

Reirradiation with IMRT for recurrent head and neck cancer: A single-institutional report on disease control, survival, and toxicity.

AIM: To study and explores the feasibility and efficacy of re-irradiation (Re-RT) for locally recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) and second primary (SP) malignancies. BACKGROUND: The most common form of treatment failure after radiotherapy (RT) for HNC is loco-regional recurrence (LRR), and around 20-50% of patients develop LRR. Re-irradiation (Re-RT) has been the primary standard of care in the last decade for unresectable locally recurrent/SP HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis in which we reviewed the medical records of 51 consecutive patients who had received Re-RT to the head and neck region at our institute between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included for assessment of acute and late toxicities, response evaluation at 3 months post Re-RT, and analyses of locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). The median LRC was 11.2 months, and at 2 and 5 years the LRC rates were 41% and 21.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed two factors: initial surgical resection performed prior to Re-RT, and achievement of CR at 3 months after completion of Re-RT to be significantly associated with a better median LRC. The median OS was 28.2 months, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, OS were 71.1%, 55.9% and 18%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed initial surgical resection performed prior to Re-RT, and achievement of CR at 3 months post completion of Re-RT being only two factors significantly associated with a better median OS. Acute toxicity reports showed that no patients developed grade 5 toxicity, and 2 patients developed grade 4 acute toxicities. CONCLUSION: Re-RT for the treatment of recurrent/SP head and neck tumors is feasible and effective, with acceptable toxicity. However, appropriate patient selection criteria are highly important in determining survival and treatment outcomes.

Dosimetric Comparison between Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and 3 Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Objective: To compare dosimetric parameters of 3 dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3 DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in terms of target coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in the management of rectal carcinoma. Methods: In this prospective study, conducted between August 2014 and March 2016, all patients underwent CT simulation along with a bladder protocol and target contouring according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines. Two plans were made for each patient (3 DCRT and IMRT) for comparison of target coverage and OAR. Result: A total of 43 patients were recruited into this study. While there were no significant differences in mean Planning Target Volume (PTV) D95% and mean PTV D98% between 3 DCRT and IMRT, mean PTV D2% and mean PTV D50% were significantly higher in 3 DCRT plans. Compared to IMRT, 3 DCRT resulted in significantly higher volumes of hot spots, lower volumes of cold spots, and higher doses to the entire OAR. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that IMRT achieves superior normal tissue avoidance (bladder and bowel) compared to 3 DCRT, with comparable target dose coverage.

Primary Gastric Burkitt's Lymphoma.

The primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, although rare, is among the most common extra-nodal lymphomas, considering that gastric lymphomas are more common than intestinal lymphomas. Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive form of B-cell lymphoma that is typically endemic in Africa, while non-endemic cases are found in the rest of the world. Primary gastric BL is extremely rare and only around 50 cases have been reported worldwide. Here we present the case of a young HIV-negative male, who was referred to our department with a stage IV gastric BL. He was planned for palliative chemotherapy, but after the first cycle of chemotherapy he succumbed to the progression of the disease.

Is volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) better than intensity modulated radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies? A dosimetric comparison.

AIMS: Evaluation of the dosimetric advantage, if any, of RapidArc (double arc and triple arc [DA and TA]) over standard fixed field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in gynecologic malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 cases of gynecologic malignancies were included. Static IMRT sliding window, single arc (SA), DA and TA plans were generated with eclipse planning system. The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy/28# to the planning target volumes. RESULTS: IMRT provided target coverage equivalent to DA and inferior to TA (D95% [in Gy]--49.94, 49.58, 49.96, 50.17 for IMRT, SA, DA and TA respectively--all observations in the same sequence). Conformity index 90 (CI 90 (0.964, 0.927, 0.918, 0.822) and homogeneity index (0.0683, 0.119, 0.098, 0.097) of IMRT were superior. TA was superior to other arcs in all parameters except CI 90 (P=0.805) and bladder dose (lower in DA). Rectal, bladder and bowel sparing was best achieved with IMRT followed by TA; bilateral femur dose was lower in arcs. The total monitor units and treatment time of arcs were significantly lower than IMRT, reduced by a factor of 2.41-2.59 and 3.2-3.5 respectively (All P values significant). CONCLUSION: IMRT provided better overall plan for gynecologic malignancies with lower organs at risk dose and target coverage equivalent to DA and TA. Treatment delivery efficiency was higher with RapidArc. The TA plan is dosimetrically superior to DA, but the gain is small. The decision whether or not to add a third arc for a small gain should be individualized.