Prevalence of medical emergency events in primary dental care within the UK.

Introduction Dental professionals have an ethical and legal obligation to diagnose and manage medical emergencies which may occur in primary dental care.Aims and objectives To investigate the prevalence of medical emergencies in UK primary dental care and explore the medical emergency training needs of UK primary dental care professionals.Design and setting Cross-sectional survey, targeting dentists, dental hygienists and dental therapists across the UK working within primary dental care.Materials and methods An online survey was distributed via dental society mailing lists, social media groups and a dental conference. The questionnaire consisted of participants demographics and training in, prevalence of and confidence surrounding medical emergencies.Results Respondents (n = 400) were dentists (55.8%), dental hygienists/therapists (38.8%) and specialists (5.5%). Most participants received basic life support training (62%) in 2019, before COVID-19. The most common medical emergencies were syncope, non-specific collapse and hypoglycaemia, being encountered every 1.59, 1.64 and 8.26 years, respectively. The preferred method for medical emergency training was practical based, with more training in administering emergency drugs and equipment identified as a training need.Conclusion Dental professionals will encounter medical emergencies in primary dental care every 1-2 years and are therefore not uncommon.

Can probiotics prevent dental caries?

DATA SOURCES: This study was a systematic review conducted in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was undertaken using eleven databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Scopus, Sinomed, Sciencedirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Technology Periodicals Database (VIP). Additional studies were identified by searching the references of these studies. The search time was from inception to April 2022. STUDY SELECTION: The population, intervention, comparison and outcomes were considered. The level of evidence was limited to relevant randomised control trials (RCT) that answered the questions defined in this review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Screening of eligible studies was conducted by two independent reviewers. Data was extracted using a standardised form which included information about the type of research, population, sample size of experimental group and control group, outcome measurements and results. Bias risk and evidence quality assessment were also assessed. Where appropriate, standard meta-analysis techniques were used to pool study results. The statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan5.4 software and the Stata16. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the combined analysis results. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs were identified to meet the eligibility criteria. The trials lasted between 2 and 24 weeks and were published after 2000. The studies encompassed 3781 preschool children divided into an experimental group (n = 2047) and a control group (n = 1734). The meta-analysis highlighted that incidence of dental caries could be prevented by probiotics. Caries incidence in preschool children was reduced in the Lactobacillus rhamnosus group. Streptococcus Mutans (S.mutans) count in saliva could be reduced however, probiotics could not reduce the number of S.mutans in dental plaque. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that probiotics could prevent dental caries. Lactobacillus rhamnosus was identified as the more effective than other probiotics to reduce dental caries in preschool children.

Can music therapy and aroma therapy really reduce dental anxiety and fear?

DESIGN: This study was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the effectiveness of music therapy and aromatherapy on reducing dental anxiety and fear in children during a fissure sealant treatment. CASE SELECTION: Participants were selected from three primary schools from the Phitsanulok Province in Thailand. These children were randomly allocated to a (1) Control group (n = 33), (2) Music Therapy Experimental Group (n = 33), (3) Aromatherapy Group (n = 33) and (4) Combination Experimental Group (n = 33). Measures included dental anxiety and fear scores as well as vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation level) pre- and post-fissure sealant treatment. DATA ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used for categorical data. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for continuous data. For the four arms, Chi-squared tests and one-way ANOVA were used to compare base line characteristics of the participants. Paired t-tests were used to compare changes within groups in dental anxiety and fear and vital signs pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 128 participants took part in were in the final analysis (32, 33, 31 and 32 in groups 1-4, respectively). In the music therapy group and aromatherapy group, there was a decrease in dental anxiety and fear, blood pressure and increase in oxygen saturation level (p = 0.05). In the combination group, there was a decrease in dental anxiety and fear, heart rate, blood pressure and increase in oxygen saturation level (p = 0.05). A statistically significant interaction effect was found between combination therapy on dental anxiety and fear (F = 22.22; P < 0.001) and oxygen saturation level (F = 17.40; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that the findings of this RCT suggest that the use of music therapy and aromatherapy reduces dental anxiety and fear in children, and is more effective when used in combination.

Assessing dentist and dental student knowledge of and attitudes towards shared decision-making in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a partnership between healthcare professionals and patients when choosing care. AIM: To measure knowledge of, and attitudes to, SDM amongst undergraduate dental students and dentists in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional online questionnaire for 4th and 5th year dental students and dentists in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The questionnaire included attitudinal questions, knowledge of SDM relative to the evidence base and preferred approach to decision-making. The questionnaire identified perceived learning needs and preferred method for SDM teaching for dentists and dental students. Respondents were invited to participate via social media, mailing lists and CPD courses. RESULTS: Respondents included 266 undergraduates and 130 dentists. SDM was defined by the people involved, components of the discussion, approach to decision-making and expected outcome. Attitudes to SDM were generally positive although concerns were expressed about patients wanting professionals to make the decision, straying from the professionals' preferred option and compatibility with clinical guidelines. Respondents reported a preference for decision-making to involve patients, but this tended to be an informative rather than deliberative approach. Respondents were least sure of the evidence about the impact of SDM on adherence, choices and health outcomes, and the best approach to risk communication. Respondents from both groups reported an interest in learning more about SDM and its integration into clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of, and attitude to, SDM in UK dentists and dental undergraduates is generally positive; however, a demand for further SDM training was identified.