RESUMO
Background Patients need to be educated and all possible treatment alternatives should be explored. Patients should be given options that they can choose from based on their demographic information, clinical information, and possible options for treating a given issue. This is especially true in elective surgery. The concept of safety plays a major part in every field, particularly in medicine. The patient's safety is a key factor for a better experience and a better outcome. Objective This study aims to determine patient perceptions of surgical safety with an emphasis on surgical team interaction throughout the phases of care. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Patients undergoing elective surgery and hospitalized for more than 24 hours were asked to give their opinions regarding interactions between them and the surgical teams, including the nurses, anesthesiologists, and surgeons who operated on them. Only patients aged 18 or above were included in the sample. The analysis was carried out using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). Results More than 70% of the study respondents had had more than one surgery. One hundred and ten of the study respondents said that the specific surgeons who attended to them encouraged them to ask questions. The majority of the respondents (76.7%) said that the surgical team gave them definite physical comfort, while the rest (23.3%) stated that they got somewhat less physical comfort from the surgical team. The average rating of the satisfaction pre-surgery was mean (M) = 8.51, standard deviation (SD) = 1.9, (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.19 - 8.83) while the average satisfaction rating for postoperative care was M = 9.05, SD = 1.35, (95% CI: 8.82 - 9.27). Conclusions Most patients valued surgeon-patient interaction as it was seen to reduce pre-surgery anxiety, helped in giving options, and improved the patient's overall understanding of the surgical procedure. Surgical teams are generally highly rated in terms of overall service pre- and post-surgery.
RESUMO
Objectives The heterogenicity of breast cancer (BC) is determined by the status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). Triple-positive BC (TPBC) expresses the amplification/overexpression of the HER2 pathway and is positive for ER and PR. This subtype has a distinct clinical behavior. However, very few studies are focused on TPBC. This study investigated the clinicopathological features and metastatic pattern of TPBC. Methods A seven-year retrospective study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All females with TPBC diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2017, were enrolled. Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Results From 1205 BC patients, the TPBC incidence was 10% (n = 124). The mean age at diagnosis was 51 years. On physical examination, a high tendency to show pathological skin changes was observed. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most common histological type, presenting with a poorly differentiated histological grade (grade 3). Over a median two-year follow-up, the incidence of metastasis was 27.4% (n = 34). Bone was the most common site. The incidence of locoregional recurrence was 9.7%. Overall survival was 89.5%. Conclusion TPBC has an early tendency for metastasis and commonly affects the breast skin. BC should be approached based on the immunohistochemical diagnosis. We encourage more comprehensive studies to target TPBC for more insights into the heterogeneity of BC.
