Role of interventions targeting plantar cutaneous receptors in improving postural control in chronic ankle instability: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a disorder that occurs after one or more acute ankle sprains and is characterised by persistent symptoms which include episodes of ''giving way'' a sensation of instability, recurrent ankle sprains, and functional deficits. Despite of effective treatment strategies a comprehensive approach is needed that can break this continuum of disability and improve the postural control. A systematic review with meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of interventions targeting plantar cutaneous receptors for improving postural control in individuals with chronic ankle instability. METHODS: The systematic review with meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Outcome measure used to evaluate the improvement in which static postural control was assessed on SLBT (Single limb balance test) and COP (Centre of pressure) whereas dynamic postural control was assessed on SEBT (star excursion balance test) and scores expressed as mean ± SD and random-effects model were performed, and heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: A total of 168 CAI populations were included among the 8 selected studies in the meta-analysis. In which,5 studies using Plantar massage and 3 studies using foot insole were assessed, with moderate to high quality on the Pedro scale (range 4-7). For single and six-sessions of plantar massage showed insignificant effect on SLBT COP and for the single session of custom moulded FO showed insignificant effect on SEBT. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis showed non-significant pooled results for plantar massage and foot orthotics on static and dynamic postural control when assessed on postural outcome measures. Further high-quality evidence-based trials would be required to highlight the importance of sensory targeted approaches to treat the postural instability in CAI patients.

Is routine removal of syndesmotic screw justified? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Syndesmosis injuries are common with rotational ankle injuries, and placement of a positional syndesmotic screw to maintain its reduction is used as the ligaments heal. There is no clear consensus on routine removal or retention of syndesmotic screw. This study aimed to appraise the current evidence both on removal and retention of syndesmotic screw and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes and rate of complications of syndesmotic screw removal and retention. METHODS: Following PROSPERO registration, a systematic search using was performed using keywords ('Syndesmosis' OR 'Syndesmotic' OR 'Transsyndesmotic' OR 'distal tibiofibular') AND ('Screw') AND ('Removal' OR 'Retention') AND 'Outcome' in various databases. No language restrictions were applied and the meta-analysis incorporated the PRISMA statement. VAS (Visual analogue scale for pain), AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society) scores expressed as mean ± SD, and both groups' complication rates were compared. Comparisons with a random-effects model were performed, and heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using the I2 statistic. T-test for two independent sample means was used to compare pooled mean and Z-test for two proportions to assess the difference in the proportion of complications. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies with 522 patients were included in this review for analysis. Pooled analysis showed non-significant difference in AOFAS score (MD = -1.84; 95% CI: -4.33 to 0.66; p = 0.150) as well as for VAS score (MD = -0.48; 95% CI: -1.56 to 0.60; p = 0.390) between the two groups. The value of z and p-value for complication rates was 0.6021 and 0.5485, respectively, which was not significant. CONCLUSION: There doesn't appear to be a difference in functional outcome, pain scores, and complication rates between patients who had their syndesmotic screws removed and those where screw was retained. The fear of inferior outcomes with retained screws is thus unfounded, and routine removal adds to morbidity and financial burden. In conclusion, present data does not support the routine removal of the intact syndesmosis screw, and a change in practice is needed to abandon routine syndesmotic screw removal.

Diagnosis and conservative management of great toe pathologies: a review.

Acute great toe (Hallux) pain is a common complaint encountered by the primary care physician. Pathological conditions can vary from acute trauma to acute exacerbation of underlying chronic conditions. Delay in treatment or misdiagnosis can lead to debilitating loss of function and long-lasting pain. This review endeavors to discuss the pertinent history, physical exam findings, radiographic evidence, conservative treatment options, and surgical management for the musculoskeletal causes of acute and acute on chronic great toe pain in the adult population. The acute pathologies discussed in this review are hallux fractures and dislocations, turf toe, sand toe, and sesamoid disorders. The chronic pathologies discussed include hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, and chronic sesamoiditis.

Management of acute lesser toe pain.

Patients with foot pain commonly present to their primary care physicians for their initial management and treatment. These patients and their respective foot or lesser toe pain can present the physician with a complex problem with a long differential list. Depending on the timing of the pain and underlying pathology, these differentials can be divided into acute and acute exacerbation of chronic conditions. This review categorizes the history, physical exam, radiological findings, conservative treatment, and surgical management for each major cause of lesser toe pain, whether acute or chronic. The acute conditions surrounding lesser toe pain in the adult population discussed are toe fractures, toe dislocations, and metatarsal head and neck fractures. The chronic pathologies surrounding lesser toe pain in the adult population evaluated in this review include metatarsalgia, Morton's neuroma, Freiberg infraction, brachymetatarsia, bunionettes, and lesser toe disorders.

Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous publications of the late 20th century have presented the radiological outcome of open technique for distal metatarsal osteotomy for mild to moderate hallux valgus and the clinical outcomes by means of well-established scoring systems which have been published and make these open techniques today's benchmark and gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures reduce surgical trauma because they are performed without large incisions, and injury to the soft tissues is limited. This has the theoretical advantages of improved recovery and decreased rehabilitation times. There is however limited literature to prove the same for minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus.Our aim was thus to pool all available comparative literature on minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery done for mild to moderate hallux valgus versus open surgical approaches. METHODS: A PubMed, Embase and Scopus search was performed using the keywords ('hallux valgus' OR bunion) AND ('minimally invasive' OR percutaneous) AND osteotomy. A total of 473 records were identified and out of which nine studies were included in the final review. RESULTS: Most available studies are either randomized control trials, or prospective cohort studies providing good level of evidence. Radiological analysis showed similar correction with both MIS and open osteotomies. In functional analysis results were different with open techniques providing better results in terms of AOFAS score. (p < 0.0001). VAS score and complication rate were similar in both groups. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We conclude that based on available literature MIS provides equivalent radiological outcomes with respect to open surgery but functionally despite the promising results (good to excellent in most series), the outcomes in terms of function are not as good as open surgery. MIS techniques provide satisfactory outcomes for mild-to-moderate severity of hallux valgus though not as good as open surgery. There is evolving literature for this relatively new procedure. Longer duration of follow up and bigger numbers would allow for more meaningful data analysis and conclusions to be drawn as more studies come forward.