RESUMO
Dental implantology has witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, and zirconia has emerged as a prominent biomaterial for dental implant applications. This review explores the multifaceted aspects of zirconia, focusing on its properties, processing methods, biocompatibility, mechanical performance, and clinical applications. Over the past few decades, the most popular choice of material for dental implantology has been titanium which has been found to have the highest success rate of implant treatment. However, recently, it has been observed that zirconia might replace titanium and eventually emerge as one of the gold-standard materials of dental implants. Analysis of biomechanical sciences and biomaterial sciences provides an opportunity for the refinement of design and material notions for surgical implants. However, the most important aspect and prime concern is how tissue at the implant site responds to biomechanical disturbances caused by foreign materials. The literature revealed that zirconia has certain characteristics that make it an excellent material for implants, including biocompatibility and osseointegration which depicts positive soft tissue response with low plaque affinity as well as aesthetics owing to light transmission and color. Additionally, this review discusses the current challenges and prospects of zirconia in dental implantology as well as aims to provide dental professionals and researchers with a comprehensive understanding of zirconia's potential as a biomaterial in dental implantology. The present overview of available literature intends to highlight and explore the biological characteristics of zirconia for applications in dental implantology. However, research is urgently required to fill in gaps over time for clinical assessments of all zirconia implants, consequently, the implementation of hybrid systems (a titanium screw with a zirconia collar) has recently been suggested.
RESUMO
Background Children who are afraid of the dentist have terrible behavioral effects, and one of those effects is that they have a preconceived concept that getting treatment would be unpleasant. Such fear and anxiety can lead to avoidance of dental care. These patients must be recognized and their concerns addressed as soon as possible. It is, therefore, important to highlight the connection between the constructs that target the development of dental fear and anxiety, including its outcome in children concerning the prevalence of dental diseases. Aims and objectives To assess the prevalence of dental anxiety and its correlation to dental caries and gingivitis in students in Wardha aged six to 12 years old. Methods Two hundred schoolchildren between the ages of six and 12 were chosen at random, with 100 boys and 100 girls. Children had an oral examination utilizing the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) Index as well as the Loe and Silness gingival index (GI), as well as a modified version of the dental fear survey questionnaire. Results In the study population, the prevalence of low to moderate "general dental fear" was 47%, whereas the frequency of high dental fear was 14%. The mean DMFT (1.80 ± 1.76) and GI (1.04 ± 0.52) of boys did not differ substantially from the DMFT (1.94 ± 81.02) and GI (0.97 ± 0.53) of girls (P > 0.05). Conclusion In terms of DMFT and gingival scores, there was not any obvious distinction between male and female children. Additionally, there was no connection found between "general dental fear" and either the DMFT or GI scores. Dental fear scores decreased with increasing age.
