Clinical Impact of Mismatch Repair Protein Testing on Outcome of Early Staged Colorectal Carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and second most common in women globally. In the present study, we aimed to analyse the proportion of patients with loss of immunostaining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in all newly diagnosed stage II cases of colorectal cancer for the purpose of prognostication, for determination of further chemotherapeutic strategy and for familial screening. METHOD: From January 2014 to December 2015, 62 consecutive newly diagnosed cases of stage II colorectal cancer were included in the study. Details of each patient related to their demographic profile and tumour profile were recorded. All the cases were grossed and staged according to College of American Pathologist (CAP) guidelines. The expression of MMR proteins (which was earlier validated on normal as well as tumour tissue) in FFPE tumour tissue using IHC for mut L homologue 1 (MLH1), mut S homologue 2 (MSH2), mut S homologue 6 (MSH6) and post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2) was studied. Information regarding stage, treatment, clinical outcome and overall survival was retrieved when available. RESULTS: Out of a total of 371 cases, 62 (16.7%) cases were of stage II CRC, out of which 43 (12%) were treatment naive. Among the selected 62 cases, 26 (41.9%) demonstrated loss of MMR proteins and 36 (58.0%) cases had intact nuclear expression. Out of the cases with MMR loss, 38.4% showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2, 30.7% showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6, 26.9% showed isolated loss of PMS2 and 3.8% showed isolated loss of MSH6. Right-sided location (57.6%) was more common than left-sided (19.2%) and transverse colon (23.0%). Majority of the cases were moderately differentiated (65.3%) in morphology. There was no intratumoural infiltrate in most of the cases (53.8%), and only 3.8% cases showed marked intratumoural infiltrate. Also, peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrate was mild to moderate in most of the cases (26.9%) and marked Crohn's-like infiltrate was seen in only 7.6% cases. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the routine evaluation of MMR proteins is achievable and essential for the purpose of prognostication, planning of treatment strategies and ascertaining a hereditary basis of CRC. The incidence of MMR protein loss was quite high in our study compared to other studies probably due to a difference in ethnicity. Though a right-sided predominance was supported, none of the typical morphological features of microsatellite instability (MSI) tumours were substantiated by our study, highlighting the lack of importance of histology for predicting MSI, and emphasising the point that MSI testing should be done as a routine procedure in all stage II CRC. A short follow-up was done for all our cases and comparison between the survival of the chemotherapy treated MSI cases versus those which were treatment naïve was performed and revealed that chemotherapy (CT) did not provide additional benefit to survival; MSI tumours in general are a better prognostic category and do not require additional chemotherapy.

Analysis of Notch and TGF-ß Signaling Expression in Different Stages of Disease Progression During Hepatitis B Virus Infection.

OBJECTIVES: CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) seem to have a key role in persistence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Notch and transforming growth factor (TGF-ß) signaling independently help in the differentiation and regulation of CD4+T cells, including T-helper (T(H)) 1, T(H)2, and Tregs. Whether, the two pathways have modulatory role on different stages of HBV infection and severity of liver disease is not clear. We investigated Notch and TGF-ß families' gene expression in peripheral blood and intrahepatic lymphocytes in patients with different stages of chronic HBV (CHB) infection. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), CD4(+), and CD8(+) T cells were isolated from patients with acute HBV (AVH-B, n=15), CHB (n=16), and controls (HC, n=10). In addition to PBMCs, intrahepatic lymphocytes were obtained from liver biopsies from CHB (n=12), cirrhosis (n=12), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n=5), and healthy livers (n=5). Notch family (Notch1-4, Hes1, Jag1, and NF-kß) and TGF-ß family gene expressions were studied by real-time PCR, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Relative expression of Notch signaling target genes, Hes1 and NF-kß, was higher in the total PBMCs of AVH-B and CHB patients than that in HC patients (Log relative quantification (RQ); 1.1 AVH-B vs. 0.3 HC, 1.3 CHB vs. 0.3 HC; P=0.02). CD8(+) T cells showed upregulated expression of Hes1 and Notch1 (P=0.02 and 0.01, respectively) in AVH-B than in CHB patients. Also, in AVH-B patients, HBV-specific CD8(+) T-cell proliferation (5.74% vs. 2.7%) and TGF-ß signaling activity were higher. All Notch receptors and ligands were upregulated in the PBMCs in CHB infection (CHB vs. cirrhosis, P=0.001; CHB vs. HCC, P=0.023; and cirrhosis vs. HCC, P=NS). Intrahepatic expression of Notch1 and FoxP3 were significantly higher in cirrhotics and HCCs, and further blockage of Notch signaling reduced the FoxP3 expression. Array data of TGF-ß family showed increased TGF-ß3, TGF-α, SMAD3, SMAD4, SMAD6, and GDF9 expression on intrahepatic lymphocytes in cirrhotic and HCC patients compared with CHB. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that there is a complementary association between Notch1 and Hes1 in CD8(+)T cells during AVH-B infection. On development of CHB infection, repression of the Notch receptors mediates the regulation of immune response in patients, who progress to cirrhosis and HCC. Finally, HBV infection drives increased Notch1, TGF-ß, and FoxP3 expression on intrahepatic T cells in cirrhosis, resulting in fibrogenesis and disease progression.