Differences in safety climate among hospital anesthesia departments and the effect of a realistic simulation-based training program.

BACKGROUND: Safety climate is often measured via surveys to identify appropriate patient safety interventions. The introduction of an insurance premium incentive for simulation-based anesthesia crisis resource management (CRM) training motivated our naturalistic experiment to compare the safety climates of several departments and to assess the impact of the training. METHODS: We administered a 59-item survey to anesthesia providers in six academic anesthesia programs (Phase 1). Faculty in four of the programs subsequently participated in a CRM program using simulation. The survey was readministered 3 yr later (Phase 2). Factor analysis was used to create scales regarding common safety themes. Positive safety climate (% of respondents with positive safety attitudes) was computed for the scales to indicate the safety climate levels. RESULTS: The usable response rate was 44% (309/708) and 38% (293/772) in Phases 1 and 2 respectively. There was wide variation in response rates among hospitals and providers. Eight scales were identified. There were significantly different climate scores among hospitals but no difference between the trained and untrained cohorts. The positive safety climate scores varied from 6% to 94% on specific survey questions. Faculty and residents had significantly different perceptions of the degree to which residents are debriefed about their difficult clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate indicators can vary substantially among anesthesia practice groups. Scale scores and responses to specific questions can suggest practices for improvement. Overall safety climate is probably not a good criterion for assessing the impact of simulation-based CRM training. Training alone was insufficient to alter engrained behaviors in the absence of further reinforcing actions.

Surgical field fire during a repair of bronchoesophageal fistula.

Most surgical fires involve the airway but they can also occur in the surgical field. Herein, we report an intraoperative fire in the surgical field during repair of a bronchoesophageal fistula. During the portion of the surgery after the fistula was divided and the bronchus was open to atmosphere, continuous positive airway pressure was applied to the nondependent lung, and in conjunction with the use of electrocautery and dry sponges in the field, resulted in a fire. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery carries unique risks of fire because these patients frequently require large oxygen concentrations, special interventions for improving oxygenation, and have variable degrees of airway disruption. This report highlights unique safety concerns during anesthesia for thoracic surgery, and addresses more general safety issues relating to fire risk in all surgical patients.

Giant presacral myelolipoma.

Myelolipomas are benign tumors composed of hematopoietic tissue and mature fatty tissue and occur primarily in the adrenal glands. Extra-adrenal sites for these tumors are rare. To date 37 cases have been reported in the literature with more than half of these lesions being presacral in location. The purpose of this report is to raise awareness of this unusual tumor when formulating a differential diagnosis for retroperitoneal tumors. Presacral myelolipomas are easily confused with both primary and secondary malignant retroperitoneal tumors, which are far more common and aggressive neoplasms. Particular radiographic and histologic qualities distinguish this tumor from invasive malignancy. A case report is presented with a review of the literature on extra-adrenal myelolipomas.