Systematic Innominate Artery Cannulation Strategy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Better Perfusion, Better Results.

(1) Background: Arterial cannulation in type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is still subject to debate. We describe a systematic approach of using the innominate artery for arterial perfusion (2) Methods: The hospital records of 110 consecutive patients with acute TAAAD operated on between January 2014 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of the cannulation site on early and late mortality, as well as on cardio-pulmonary perfusion indices (lactate and base excess levels, and cooling and rewarming speed) were investigated. (3) Results: There was a significant difference in early mortality (8.82% vs. 40.79%, p < 0.01) but no difference in long-term survival beyond the first 30 days. Using the innominate artery enabled the use of approximately 20% higher CPB flows (2.73 ± 0.1 vs. 2.42 ± 0.06 L/min/m2 BSA, p < 0.01), which resulted in more rapid cooling (1.89 ± 0.77 vs. 3.13 ± 1.62 min/°C/m2 BSA, p < 0.01), rewarming (2.84 ± 1.36 vs. 4.22 ± 2.23, p < 0.01), lower mean base excess levels during CPB (-5.01 ± 2.99 mEq/L vs. -6.66 ± 3.37 mEq/L, p = 0.01) and lower lactate levels at the end of the procedure (4.02 ± 2.48 mmol/L vs. 6.63 ± 4.17 mmol/L, p < 0.01). Postoperative permanent neurologic insult (3.12% vs. 20%, p = 0.02) and acute kidney injury (3.12% vs. 32.81%, p < 0.01) were significantly reduced. (4) Conclusions: systematic use of the innominate artery enables better perfusion and superior results in TAAAD repair.

How Much Malperfusion Is Too Much in Acute Type A Aortic Dissections?

(1) Background: Malperfusion is a central limiting factor in the setting of acute Type A aortic dissections (AAAD). We sought to find preoperative metabolic acidosis thresholds that might influence decision-making in this setting. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients operated on with AAAD between January 2002 and December 2017. We analyzed preoperative variables that might influence early and long-term outcomes, with particular emphasis on malperfusion markers. (3) Results: Our sample consisted of 153 patients, most of them male (69.2%), with a mean age of 55.89 ± 12.8 years. Malperfusion was present in 20.9% of cases: peripheric 25, renal 7, cerebral 4, and mesenteric 3. Cardiogenic shock was present in 18.9% of patients. Logistic regression revealed entry site (odds ratio (OR) = 2.83, p = 0.03), cardiogenic shock (OR = 3.30, p = 0.03), prebypass pH (OR = 0.93, p = 0.02) as independent risk factors for early death (<30 days). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a prebypass pH of 7.25 as a cutpoint for an unfavourable early outcome. Patients whose prebypass pH was ≤7.25 had a 2.98 higher relative risk (65.7% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Prebypass pH 7.25 (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.00, p < 0.01) and entry site (HR = 2.10, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of early phase survival (<30 days), while long-term survival (>30 days) was determined by age >65 years (HR = 3.12, p = 0.02). (4) Conclusions: Patients with a prebypass pH ≤ 7.25 have an unacceptably high early mortality after AAAD repair. Those patients might benefit from a two-stage approach.