Prevalence of hearing loss in patients with Sjögren syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sjögren syndrome (SS) is a multisystem autoimmune disease, primarily targeting salivary and lacrimal glands; skin, nasal and vaginal dryness, along with musculoskeletal pain and fatigue are the most commonly reported symptoms. Hearing loss is hypothesized to be frequent as well. The purpose of this systematic review was to estimate the prevalence of Hearing loss and its different subtypes in patients with Sjögren syndrome. PRISMA guidelines were followed to ensure highest quality for our systematic review. A random effects model meta-analysis and meta-regression was conducted using I2 as heterogeneity indicator. Eleven observational studies were included in this systematic review. Ten of them were cross-sectional, while one study was case-control. Studies were assessed for risk of bias: all were rated to a moderate level, except for two rated to a low level. Pooled prevalence of any type of hearing loss was 52.2%. After excluding studies rated to moderate bias, the pooled prevalence of hearing loss was 36.7%. We also conducted a subgroup analysis depending on type of hearing loss. Pooled prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss was 42.6%., while pooled prevalence of conductive hearing loss and mixed hearing loss were 5% and 2.3%, respectively. Meta-regression was conducted in an effort to identify possible variables capable to explain high heterogeneity between studies. Sample size and year of study were separately found to account for a portion of heterogeneity between studies of sensorineural hearing loss. Year of study was also found to account for a portion of heterogeneity between studies of conductive hearing loss. In conclusion, sensorineural hearing loss, is highly prevalent in patients with Sjögren syndrome. On this basis, early screening and follow-up of patients with Sjögren syndrome by pure tone audiometry is important.

Association of systemic lupus erythematosus with hearing loss: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that can affect virtually any organ, including middle and/or inner ear. The objective of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association of SLE with the different subtypes of hearing loss. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in agreement with the PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=216353 ). A random effects model meta-analysis was carried out while heterogeneity was appraised by I2. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Nine studies comprising 7,654 SLE patients and 37,244 controls were included in this systematic review. Four of them were rated to a moderate rate of bias, while five of them were rated to a low rate of bias. SLE patients had significantly increased odds of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) compared with controls (OR 2.31; 95%CI 1.48-3.60; I2 = 0). SLE patients did not have significantly increased odds of Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.23-7.45; I2 = 0). Only one study reported on the outcome of Mixed Hearing Loss (MHL) (3 events in SLE group vs. 0 events in control group). Subgroup analysis, based on study design and detection method of hearing loss also showed significantly increased odds of SNHL in SLE patients. The significantly increased odds of SNHL in SLE persisted even after sensitivity analysis. In conclusion, SLE is significantly associated with SNHL; SLE is not associated with CHL, while, due to lack of data, we could not reach a conclusion regarding the odds of MHL in SLE patients. Pure tone audiometry as a screening test and follow-up test in SLE patients could be of essence. Management and prognosis of hearing loss in SLE patients should be discussed.

Association between age at menopause and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Early menopause (EM, age at menopause < 45 years) and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI, age at menopause < 40 years) are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. However, their association with increased fracture risk has not been established, with studies yielding conflicting results. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize studies evaluating the association between age at menopause and fracture risk. The secondary aim was to evaluate this effect concerning the site of fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus, up to 31 January 2018. Data were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The I2 index was employed for quantifying heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis (462,393 postmenopausal women, 12,130 fractures). Compared with women with age at menopause > 45 years, women with EM demonstrated higher fracture risk (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.66, p < 0.002, I² 81.5%). Women with POI did not display any difference in fracture risk compared either with women with age at menopause > 40 (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.09, p = 0.436, I² 62.5%) or >45 years (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.22-1.29, p = 0.17, I2 0%). No difference was evident when a separate analysis was performed for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis showing that EM is associated with increased fracture risk compared with normal age at menopause, without any distinct effect on the site of the fracture.

Early menopause and premature ovarian insufficiency are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective/Design Menopausal transition has been associated with a derangement of glucose metabolism. However, it is not known if early menopause (EM, defined as age at menopause <45 years) or premature ovarian insufficiency (POI, defined as age at menopause <40 years) are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To systematically investigate and meta-analyze the best evidence regarding the association of age at menopause with the risk of T2DM. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus, up to January 31, 2018. Data are expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The I 2 index was employed for heterogeneity. Results Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis (191 762 postmenopausal women, 21 664 cases with T2DM). Both women with EM and POI were at higher risk of T2DM compared with those of age at menopause of 45-55 years (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.26, P = 0.003; I 2: 61%, P < 0.002 and OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.19, P = 0.033; I 2: 75.2%, P < 0.003), respectively). Similar associations emerged when women with EM and POI were compared with those of age at menopause >45 years (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20, P < 0.02; I 2: 78%, P < 0.001 and OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.03-2.27, P = 0.035; I 2: 78%, P < 0.001), respectively). Conclusions Both EM and POI are associated with increased risk of T2DM.

Should we Consider Lipoprotein (a) in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolaemia?

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetically determined lipid disorder, affecting 1 per 200-500 individuals in the general population. It is significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD), although it remains still an underrecognized and undertreated disease. Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-like molecule, containing an additional protein, apolipoprotein (a). OBJECTIVE: This review aims to present and discuss available data on the role of Lp(a) in patients with FH, in terms of its potential augmentation of CVD risk. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed to identify studies evaluating the CV effects of Lp(a) in patients with FH. RESULTS: Lp(a) has been recognised as an independent risk factor for CVD, mainly coronary artery disease (CAD). Most, but not all, studies show increased Lp(a) concentrations in adults and children with FH. There is also evidence of an independent association between Lp(a) and CVD (mainly CAD) risk in these patients. CONCLUSION: Some therapeutic modalities, such as niacin, oestrogens, tibolone and proprotein convertase subtilisin/ kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors may effectively reduce Lp(a) concentrations by 25-30%, although their clinical benefit of this effect remains to be established.

The effect of antidiabetic medications on the cardiovascular system: a critical appraisal of current data.

Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes are associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. This risk seems to be reduced by achievement of euglycemia. However, after the withdrawal of rosiglitazone from the market, the question arose as to whether this risk concerns simply a matter of euglycemia or the distinct role played by each antidiabetic drug with respect to its effect on CVD risk. To address this issue, many studies have been published during the last decade involving old and new antidiabetic agents, which however yielded contradictory results. Briefly, metformin is still considered safe and confers a beneficial effect on CVD risk. Conflicting data exist as concerns sulfonylureas, although the second and third generation representatives are regarded as relatively safe. Pioglitazone use seems to be associated with a reduction in CVD risk, whereas the dipeptidyl-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), lixisenatide and exenatide-LAR [from the category of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists], confer a neutral effect. Two other GLP-1R agonists, liraglutide and semaglutide, as well as the sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT2)-inhibitors, empagliflozin and cangliflozin, have shown an additional effect on CVD risk reduction, although their safety is in doubt. Insulin analogues and newer long-acting compounds are also safe for the cadiovascular system. The aim of this narrative review is to present and critically analyse the current data for each antidiabetic drug category with regard to their effect on CVD risk.