Oncological safety of simultaneous transurethral resection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Objectives: To examine the oncological safety of simultaneous resection of bladder tumor and prostate in the presence of non-muscle invasive high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Materials and Methods: Between 2007 and 2019, 170 men with high-grade UCB who had a follow-up of at least 12 months were included in the study, including 123 with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) only and 47 with simultaneous TURBT and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We recorded and compared patients' clinicopathological parameters, recurrence, and progression rates during the follow-up period, as well as time to UCB recurrence in the bladder and the prostatic urethra/fossa. Results: Baseline demographic and pathological characteristics were comparable between the groups. At a median follow-up of 31 months in both groups, there were no significant differences in recurrence rates in the bladder and the prostatic urethra/fossa in either group (34.1% and 7.3% vs. 36.2 and 6.4%, p=0.402, p=0.363). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of follow-up time, elapsed time to recurrence, or and progression in the bladder or prostatic urethra/fossa. Conclusions: Simultaneous TURBT and TURP in the presence of high-grade UCB appears to be oncologically safe in selected patients.

Value of separate tumor base biopsy in transurethral resection of bladder tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate whether a biopsy from the tumor base after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) has an impact on subsequent management of patients with bladder tumors. While tumor base biopsy at the completion of TURBT is a common practice, there is no definition of its role within the major international professional guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients undergoing TURBT between 2015 and 2019 at our institution. We recorded demographic and tumor characteristics of initial TURBT, tumor base biopsy and restaging TURBT pathology outcomes. The pathologic outcomes were correlated to assess the additional value of a separate tumor base biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 532 patients underwent TURBT. A separate tumor base biopsy after completion of TURBT was performed in 154 patients. The mean patient's age was 72.8 ±11.7 years (range 48-94) and 119 (77.2%) were men. In 40 patients (25.9%) muscle was absent in the pathological specimen of the tumor resection. Muscle was present in all but 6 (3.9%) tumor base biopsies. Of the 33 patients who underwent repeated transurethral resection for pT1 tumors, 2 had residual low-grade pTa, 1 had residual high-grade pT1, and 3 patients were upstaged to pT2. CONCLUSIONS: Although tumor base biopsy at the completion of TURBT is a common practice, our analysis fails to demonstrate any tangible benefit in the staging of bladder tumors. In our experience tumor base biopsy did not change the management in patients with superficial or muscle invasive disease.

Pain Control after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison between Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Wound Infiltration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of unilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus wound local infiltration for postoperative pain following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who underwent extraperitoneal LRP and received either wound infiltration or unilateral TAP block for analgesia were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the technique used. We compared pain intensity scores and on-demand analgesic use both during the hospital stay and post-discharge between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included, 27 received unilateral TAP blocks (group 1) and 21 were managed with wound infiltration (group 2). The unilateral TAP block group showed lower median pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 with pain scores being 0.2 (0-4) and 0.8 (0-4), respectively (p < 0.05). On POD2, the median pain intensity was 0.9 (0-5) and 1.6 (0-6) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.05). The median number of on-demand analgesic doses during the POD1 was 0.2 (0-2) and 0.4 (0-2) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.19). On POD2, the patients received 0.5 (0-2) and 1.1 (0-3) on-demand doses in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Unilateral TAP block might improve pain control more pronounced after LRP than wound infiltration.