RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The 48-week, phase 2 SLEek study (NCT03978520) evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (Janus kinase inhibitor) and elsubrutinib (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor) alone or in combination (ABBV-599) in adults with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to once-daily (QD) ABBV-599 high dose (HD; elsubrutinib 60mg + upadacitinib 30mg), ABBV-599 low dose (LD; elsubrutinib 60mg + upadacitinib 15mg), elsubrutinib 60mg, upadacitinib 30mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving both SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) and glucocorticoid dose ≤10mg QD at week 24. Additional assessments through week 48 included British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) responses, number of flares, time to first flare, and adverse events. RESULTS: The study enrolled 341 patients. The ABBV-599LD and elsubrutinib arms were discontinued after a planned interim analysis showed lack of efficacy (no safety concerns). More patients achieved the primary endpoint with upadacitinib (54.8%; P=0.028) and ABBV-599HD (48.5%; P=0.081) versus placebo (37.3%). SRI-4, BICLA, and LLDAS response rates were higher for both upadacitinib and ABBV-599HD versus placebo at weeks 24 and 48. Flares were reduced and time to first flare through week 48 was substantially delayed with both upadacitinib and ABBV-599HD versus placebo. No new safety signals were observed beyond those previously reported for upadacitinib or elsubrutinib. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib 30mg alone or in combination with elsubrutinib (ABBV-599HD) demonstrated significant improvements in SLE disease activity, reduced flares and were well tolerated through 48 weeks.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Phase 3 study ENVISION I demonstrated efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. The protocol-specified high-dose adalimumab regimen was numerically more efficacious than the standard-dose regimen. The objective of this work was to bridge a fixed-dosing regimen to the protocol-specified high-induction/high-maintenance, body weight-based dosing regimen studied in ENVISION I, using a pharmacometrics modelling and simulation approach. METHODS: A stepwise strategy was implemented, including developing an adalimumab paediatric population pharmacokinetic model; using this model to determine a fixed-dosing regimen in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients which achieves similar concentrations to those observed in ENVISION I patients; determining adalimumab exposure-response relationship using population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model and data from ENVISION I; simulating clinical remission rate in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients using the Markov exposure-response model and the dosing regimen determined to provide similar efficacy to that observed in ENVISION I. RESULTS: Both developed population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models adequately described the observed data. Adalimumab exposure was identified as a significant predictor of clinical remission at Week 8 based on logistic regression [p <0.01]. Simulated efficacy suggested that the fixed-dosing regimen performs similarly to the more efficacious dosing regimen used in ENVISION I, by providing comparable clinical remission per Partial Mayo Score response rates over time. No relationship between adalimumab exposure and adverse events was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model supports the appropriateness of the use of the fixed-dosing regimen in the paediatric ulcerative colitis population.
